After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 352472 - Birthdays and/or Anniversaries missing
Birthdays and/or Anniversaries missing
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 311098
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Calendar
2.6.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-08-23 00:05 UTC by Karsten Bräckelmann
Modified: 2006-08-23 00:20 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-08-23 00:05:56 UTC 
Edit a Contact with neither Birthday nor Anniversary set.

* Add a Birthday, see it appear in the Calendar.

* Then add an Anniversary, see it appear in the Calendar.
  However, the Birthday now is *not* being displayed. [1]

* Unset Birthday.
  Note that the Anniversary disappeared from the Calendar, too. [1]

* Set the Birthday again.
  Note that the Anniversary disappeared from the Calendar, again. [1]


* Unset Anniversary.
  Note that the Birthday disappeared from the Calendar, too. [1]

* Set the Anniversary again.  Note that both Birthday and Anniversary
  disappeared from the Calendar... [1]


Edit a Contact with neither Birthday nor Anniversary set.

* Add an Anniversary, see it appear in the Calendar.

* Then add a Birthday.  Note that both Birthday and Anniversary
  disappeared from the Calendar... [1]


[1] Disabling and re-enabling the Birthdays and Anniversaries Calendar makes the missing one appear again. Just uncheck and re-check the checkbox next to the Calendar in the tree...

While testing I constantly switched between Calendar and Adress Book.
Comment 1 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-08-23 00:06:21 UTC 
*** Bug 352445 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-08-23 00:08:06 UTC 
See bug 306963 comment 2 for some hints when and by whom a related bug has been fixed. This probably is a result of that code.
Comment 3 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-08-23 00:16:58 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> See bug 306963 comment 2 for some hints when and by whom a related bug has been
> fixed. This probably is a result of that code.

Also bug 303994.
Comment 4 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-08-23 00:20:49 UTC 
*sigh*

More digging for related bugs... Seems this most likely is a duplicate of bug 311098 actually.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 311098 ***