GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 367699
crash in Image Viewer: Viewing pictures on an N...
Last modified: 2006-11-28 22:34:50 UTC
Version: 2.16.1 What were you doing when the application crashed? Viewing pictures on an NFS server Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy) Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu) BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0 Memory status: size: 0 vsize: 0 resident: 0 share: 0 rss: 0 rss_rlim: 0 CPU usage: start_time: 0 rtime: 0 utime: 0 stime: 0 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/eog' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash. Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so. Thanks in advance!
Here you are, I hope it helps Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy) Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu) BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0 Memory status: size: 72589312 vsize: 0 resident: 72589312 share: 0 rss: 26906624 rss_rlim: 0 CPU usage: start_time: 1162226125 rtime: 0 utime: 486 stime: 0 cutime:457 cstime: 0 timeout: 29 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 1 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/eog' Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1". [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1226544960 (LWP 6493)] [New Thread -1258214496 (LWP 6495)] [New Thread -1228158048 (LWP 6494)] 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 80517
Thread 1 (Thread -1226544960 (LWP 6493))
guy, looks very good, thanks. This is the same stacktrace as in bug 358653 which was marked as a duplicate of bug 348651. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 348651 ***
look closer,Andre, the duping must be wrong
Fixed in CVS. The fix will go into the next patch release. Thank you for your bug report. Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 354327 ***
(In reply to comment #5) > Fixed in CVS. The fix will go into the next patch release. Thank you for your > bug report. > This is not fixed yet.
comment #18 in the dup "This is already fixed in the 'eog-ng' branch, whose job queue code has been rewritten and is far more stable and consistent than current[2]."