After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 214977 - Contact lists on LDAP server are broken
Contact lists on LDAP server are broken
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Contacts
1.5.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-addressbook-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 226659 245535 252349 256520 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-11-10 00:32 UTC by Yatin Chawathe
Modified: 2013-09-10 13:59 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Yatin Chawathe 2001-11-10 00:32:13 UTC
It seems like the implementation of contact lists for LDAP servers is 
broken.  When I try to create a new Contact List on a writable LDAP server 
via evo, a new record gets created on the LDAP server.  However, that 
record is indistinguishable from a regular contact record (i.e. a non-list 
record) except that the "mail" attributes for the individual addresses in 
the contact list are XML records.  Now, if I double-click on this new 
record inside evo, it pops up the Contact Editor, instead of the Contact 
List Editor.  Moreover, when I try to send email to the list, it gets 
completely confused and just assumes that the XML record in the 
first "mail" attribute is the address to send the mail to.
Comment 1 Luis Villa 2001-11-13 19:42:30 UTC
toshok?
Comment 2 Luis Villa 2001-11-27 07:18:49 UTC
Toshok? This is fairly big... tentatively 1.0.1.
Comment 3 Chris Lahey 2001-11-28 21:07:07 UTC
What schema are you using for this LDAP server?
Comment 4 Yatin Chawathe 2001-11-29 00:35:59 UTC
These are the schema files that I included in my slapd.conf

include		/etc/openldap/schema/core.schema
include		/etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema
include		/etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema
include		/etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema
include		/etc/openldap/schema/redhat/rfc822-MailMember.schema
include		/etc/openldap/schema/redhat/autofs.schema
include		/etc/openldap/schema/redhat/kerberosobject.schema
include		/etc/openldap/schema/evolutionperson.schema
Comment 5 Yatin Chawathe 2001-12-25 10:11:29 UTC
Any progress on this bug.  I just tested it with Evo 1.0 and it still
shows up.
Comment 6 Chris Toshok 2002-09-25 23:45:16 UTC
Once again this is imo not worth doing this late in the release
cycle (for 1.2).  owing to how much it'll complicate the ldap backend,
the fact that zero other ldap clients support contact lists (so
there's no standard), and the one seemingly applicable core schema
objectClass (groupOfNames) stores DN's for members, which would
require multiple queries (on top of the usual search).

Contact lists never were implemented for ldap.  the fact that you
could create them at all was a bug.  and unfortunately since bug 221192
has been future'd, it'll be possible (and confusing for the user) to
at least bring up the contact list editor regardless of whether or not
the backend supports them (at present, none but the file backend
actually does).
Comment 7 Chris Toshok 2002-09-25 23:46:30 UTC
*** bug 226659 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Radek Doulik 2002-09-27 18:53:09 UTC
<rodo> toshok: what about #14977? reschedule?
<toshok> yeah rodo
Comment 9 Edward Rudd 2003-09-03 20:37:10 UTC
This bug still occurs/exists in Evolution 1.4.x
Comment 10 André Klapper 2004-10-11 21:38:45 UTC
*** bug 245535 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 André Klapper 2004-10-11 21:57:09 UTC
*** bug 252349 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 André Klapper 2004-10-11 21:57:12 UTC
*** bug 256520 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 André Klapper 2004-10-11 21:58:37 UTC
upgrading target milestone and version number (as discussed with 
gerardo on irc).
Comment 14 André Klapper 2006-01-09 01:46:22 UTC
retargetting bugs with severity=major from 2.3 to 2.5
Comment 15 Sushma Rai 2006-01-16 08:11:24 UTC
Fixed in CVS head.