After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 19827 - Wishlist: make delete and other commands work on discontinuous selections
Wishlist: make delete and other commands work on discontinuous selections
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: Gnumeric
Classification: Applications
Component: Main System
unspecified
Other All
: Low enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Jody Goldberg
Jody Goldberg
: 122883 314007 433968 662042 698494 758997 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2000-08-04 17:40 UTC by hajhouse
Modified: 2018-05-22 12:59 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description hajhouse 2001-01-27 17:33:01 UTC
Package: gnumeric
Version: 0.56
Severity: wishlist

I would like to see cut, copy, delete, etc (basically anything that throws up
an error now if you try to use it) to work on discontinuous selections (of
rows, cells, or what have you).

-- Henry House




------- Bug moved to this database by debbugs-export@bugzilla.gnome.org 2001-01-27 12:33 -------
This bug was previously known as bug 19827 at http://bugs.gnome.org/
http://bugs.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19827
Originally filed under the Gnumeric product and general component.

The original reporter (hajhouse@houseag.com) of this bug does not have an account here.
Reassigning to the exporter, debbugs-export@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Reassigning to the default owner of the component, jgoldberg@home.com.

Comment 1 Jody Goldberg 2001-02-04 03:52:00 UTC
This is a very low priority.  It gets tricky from a user perspective 
to explain how pasting a set of discontinuous regions works.  I would 
not want to try and remember offsets.
Comment 2 Kjartan Maraas 2002-06-07 12:00:48 UTC
2.0.x bug?
Comment 3 Jody Goldberg 2002-06-07 12:25:27 UTC
wishlist
Comment 4 Andreas J. Guelzow 2003-10-01 05:54:44 UTC
*** Bug 122883 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Morten Welinder 2005-08-21 01:22:11 UTC
*** Bug 314007 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Morten Welinder 2005-08-21 22:39:22 UTC
*** Bug 314007 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Andreas J. Guelzow 2007-04-27 21:29:21 UTC
*** Bug 433968 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Dark Way 2008-02-18 12:21:01 UTC
Hi, it would be great if someone could talk about the future of this problem.
Is it:

1) too hard to fix - fixing it would break application and features (undo) -> wontfix.
2) could be fixed [hard], but would this would involve a lot of changes. -> Timeline for changes.
3) could be fixed, but there is no good solution - it is like opening the box of Pandora. -> Name the problems, so someone could look into them.

Please write something and explain, okay? I get this bug sometimes on big tables and every time I come here to check the page, nothing changes. 
I know that it is not easy, but there should be a better start point, so the people could talk/vote about it.
Comment 9 Morten Welinder 2008-02-19 14:38:01 UTC
The problems are not fundamental, but that fixing this requires a substantial
amount of work on a command-by-command basis.

Realistically, I do not see it happening anytime soon given the available
resources.
Comment 10 Andreas J. Guelzow 2010-07-14 14:19:05 UTC
Personally I don't think that this would be really to difficult to fix but my head starts spinning when I try to figure out what should really happen:

Let's consider the delete command.
Say we have a selection of B2:D4, F4:H6, D8:F10.
If the user selects delete, do we have a single movement of the remaining cells, (ie. shift up or left) or one for each sub region.

Will the user be confused about these compounded movements? For example if we shift everything to the left, then I4 moves to C4 but I5 moves only to F5.


For the copy command on the other hand, how do we place three separate region on the clipboard (say as html). One large table containing 3 subregions?
Comment 11 Andreas J. Guelzow 2011-10-18 02:10:51 UTC
*** Bug 662042 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Andreas J. Guelzow 2011-10-18 22:16:17 UTC
*** Bug 662042 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Andreas J. Guelzow 2013-04-21 16:05:04 UTC
*** Bug 698494 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14 Andreas J. Guelzow 2014-07-21 03:50:55 UTC
*** Bug 733466 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Morten Welinder 2015-12-03 17:49:41 UTC
*** Bug 758997 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16 GNOME Infrastructure Team 2018-05-22 12:59:23 UTC
-- GitLab Migration Automatic Message --

This bug has been migrated to GNOME's GitLab instance and has been closed from further activity.

You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link to our GitLab instance: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnumeric/issues/3.