After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 794305 - Deleting selected photo(s) always removes an additional non-selected one
Deleting selected photo(s) always removes an additional non-selected one
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 793818
Product: shotwell
Classification: Other
Component: library-mode
0.27.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Shotwell Maintainers
Shotwell Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2018-03-13 18:40 UTC by tobias
Modified: 2018-03-13 20:04 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 3.25/3.26


Attachments
Shotwell: Before and after pressing delete key (161.07 KB, image/png)
2018-03-13 18:40 UTC, tobias
Details

Description tobias 2018-03-13 18:40:06 UTC
Created attachment 369633 [details]
Shotwell: Before and after pressing delete key

version: 0.27.4

When I select one or multiple images and press "Del" (or use the corresponding entry in the menu), there is always one additional image removed, that wasn't selected. See attachment for screenshots. It always seems to be the image right after the last / the only selected one.

This behaviour survived a reinstall of shotwell. I could also reproduce it in a new library with only two images.

Furthermore, it occurs in every view I tried - Photos, marked, saved search, event, tag. When using "Shift + Del", everything works as expected.

As I am new here, I hope that I haven't missed any fitting bug - I tried my best with the search :-)

My current workaround: Open the image in single-view and press "Del".
Comment 1 Jens Georg 2018-03-13 19:52:48 UTC
Your bugzilla-fu failed you (which is not hard, the search is interesting sometimes)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 793818 ***
Comment 2 tobias 2018-03-13 20:04:16 UTC
(In reply to Jens Georg from comment #1)
> Your bugzilla-fu failed you (which is not hard, the search is interesting
> sometimes)
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 793818 ***

Ah, I see - quick search excludes resolved/fixed bugs. Sorry, didn't notice that before, thanks :-)