After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 787612 - Option to 'Go to the previous message after message deletion'
Option to 'Go to the previous message after message deletion'
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
3.24.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 790162 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2017-09-13 07:35 UTC by Massimo B.
Modified: 2018-07-27 08:08 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Massimo B. 2017-09-13 07:35:55 UTC
Some email clients like Aquamail on Android support an option for
After deleting message:
[ ] Go to previous message
[x] Go to next message

Actually Evolution could have a selection here for all available functions in Message->GoTo.

I prefer to have [x] Go to previous message for the following work flow:
Sorting is based on Date and decreasing (latest message on top). Now starting a day to read unread messages I usually start with the oldest unread to keep the order of arrival when working through. I tend to keep real mails while deleting generic notifications with no real information. Deleting should skip to the previous unread, if it was up to me.
Comment 1 Milan Crha 2017-09-13 16:55:10 UTC
Thanks for a bug report. It might ideally decide based on the sorting itself, like if the first sort column is ascending, then delete moves to the next message, if descending, then delete moves to the previous message. Though even there one can find counter examples where the option as you suggest would makes things more explicit.

I do not think having there next/prev unread/important/thread would be good. I rarely delete unread messages (except of spam).

Looking into Edit->Preferences->Mail Preferences, there is not much free space there, thus I'll add just
   [ ] Move to the previous message after message deletion
to the "Delete Mail" section and having that unchecked means moving to the next message instead.
Comment 2 Milan Crha 2017-09-13 17:32:00 UTC
When seeing it in action I rather slightly reworded the option in the UI.

Created commit 209351ace5 in evo master (3.27.1+)
Comment 3 Milan Crha 2017-11-30 09:49:49 UTC
*** Bug 790162 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Milan Crha 2017-11-30 09:52:54 UTC
I mentioned in bug #790162 that possibly an ideal solution, without any extra option, would be to move to the previous or next message based on the user sort. That is, in case the sort is with newest at the top, then move to the previous message and when it's newest at the bottom, then go to the next message.

It was only and idea. The added option makes it explicit, which can be considered better.
Comment 5 Milan Crha 2017-11-30 09:56:24 UTC
I also realized that marking junk/not-junk could have this used as well, thus I made it so with:

Created commit d0f9a44e28 in evo master (3.27.3+)
Comment 6 Massimo B. 2017-11-30 10:08:37 UTC
I myself prefer having the latest message on top, but still going to the "later" message after deleting. In that means the current subject "Option to 'Go to the previous message after message deletion'" is wrong and "previous" should be replaced by "later" as "previous" is based on the current sorting.

I prefer that way because I like to process and answer the mails in the sorting as arrived, starting with the earliest unread mail. However with your change that would mean I need to use the sorting with date ascending, having the latest mail on botton. But this is not be usable as I would always need to scroll hundreds mails down to get to the latest. Going to a new folder without a mail selected, the view is scrolled to top per default as usual. I know if a mail was selected the last time, that mail is still selected after returning to that folder. But I'm not sure if working on the bottom of the mail view by using your sorting would be a good idea.
Comment 7 Milan Crha 2017-11-30 10:16:53 UTC
That 'previous' here means "previous as viewed in the message list", not anything with the time of arrival. But okay, I'm fine with the explicit option. It was just an idea.