After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 77669 - GtkWrapBox for gtk itself, not gimp?
GtkWrapBox for gtk itself, not gimp?
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gtk+
Classification: Platform
Component: Widget: Other
unspecified
Other other
: Normal enhancement
: Medium API
Assigned To: gtk-bugs
gtk-bugs
Depends on: 101968 extended-layout
Blocks: 82283
 
 
Reported: 2002-04-05 00:03 UTC by kz
Modified: 2010-09-02 00:00 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description kz 2002-04-05 00:04:21 UTC 
Package: gtk+
Severity: enhancement
Version: 2.0.1
Synopsis: GtkWrapBox for gtk itself, not gimp?
Bugzilla-Product: gtk+
Bugzilla-Component: gtk

Description:
I've just found gimp-1.3 against gtk2 uses native GtkWrapBox widget not
a part of gtk.
I wonder why gtk didn't import those into gtk itself?
in many case (at least, I) need flexible width container which support
wrapping children.
and I think GtkWrapBox is good method.
I remember gimp is mother of gtk. I think gtk can inherit more goods
from mother :)




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2002-04-04 19:04 -------

Reassigning to the default owner of the component, gtk-bugs@gtk.org.
Comment 1 Matthias Clasen 2002-04-19 23:17:30 UTC 
This is an outstanding item from the now-gone TODO file. Owen points
out that they get a _lot_ more useful when you do have height-for-width
geometry management, though, and the lack of height-for-width is one
reason they weren't added for 2.0.

Look in beast and gimp for implementations of these.
Comment 2 Owen Taylor 2002-05-01 15:31:39 UTC 
(Might be possible for 2.4 ... partly depends on whether
height-for-width happens for 2.4.)
Comment 3 Stephane Wirtel 2005-02-01 21:32:59 UTC 
Too Old, 

I think I can close It.

You can reopen it if you find this feature will be intersting.
Comment 4 Matthias Clasen 2005-02-01 21:41:09 UTC 
Please don't close GTK+ bugs.
Comment 5 Matthias Clasen 2010-08-25 03:04:56 UTC 
This is being addressed in 
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2010-August/msg00216.html
Comment 6 Matthias Clasen 2010-09-02 00:00:35 UTC 

-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers