GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 764651
runtest should test htmlReadMemory() via "HTML regression tests on memory" suite
Last modified: 2021-07-05 13:22:25 UTC
Currently the "runtest" test harness doesn't provide coverage for the htmlReadMemory() API function. It should support testing htmlReadMemory() and the test suite should be named "HTML regression tests on memory" to match the "XML regression tests on memory" suite name.
Created attachment 325435 [details] [review] Patch v1 Note that two errors exist that should be fixed prior to landing this change: $ ./runtest "HTML regression tests on memory" ## HTML regression tests on memory Result for ./test/HTML/fp40.htm failed File ./test/HTML/fp40.htm generated an error Result for ./test/HTML/wired.html failed File ./test/HTML/wired.html generated an error Total 32 tests, 2 errors, 0 leaks
Created attachment 325436 [details] [review] Test result failures for htmlMemoryRead() This patch shows the differing expected results for htmlMemoryRead() for these two tests: test/HTML/fp40.htm test/HTML/wired.html These definitely look like real bugs since the output is simply truncated. It was created using the "runtest -u" patch from Bug 611807 that writes out updated results during runtest.
GNOME is going to shut down bugzilla.gnome.org in favor of gitlab.gnome.org. As part of that, we are mass-closing older open tickets in bugzilla.gnome.org which have not seen updates for a longer time (resources are unfortunately quite limited so not every ticket can get handled). If you can still reproduce the situation described in this ticket in a recent and supported software version, then please follow https://wiki.gnome.org/GettingInTouch/BugReportingGuidelines and create a new ticket at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/issues/ Thank you for your understanding and your help.