After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 69734 - Fullscreen doesn't do the right thing
Fullscreen doesn't do the right thing
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: galeon
Classification: Deprecated
Component: User interface
unspecified
Other other
: Normal normal
: 1.2
Assigned To: Jorn Baayen
Yanko Kaneti
: 68151 73375 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-01-26 10:05 UTC by lwillis
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description lwillis 2002-01-26 10:05:18 UTC 
Fullscreen mode used to work perfectly with my current setup:

$ rpm -q sawfish
sawfish-0.36-0mdk_helix_1

However current CVS doesn't place the window correctly, instead I get the
sawfish titlebar showing and I can't see galeon's statusbar. Manually
moving the window proves that galeon has scaled to the right size, just
positioned itself too low.

If the bug is sawfish I'll be happy to change but I haven't seen any
confirmation that this is the case.
Comment 1 Jorn Baayen 2002-01-27 14:34:55 UTC 
we do The Right Thing[tm] with fullscreen now, some (old version of)
windowmanagers are buggy and don't like it.

I'll try to fix this for 1.2, if i cant get it fixed i'll revert to
the (sigh) old behaviour.
Comment 2 Yanko Kaneti 2002-01-27 14:46:23 UTC 
i guess   some = most of the currently used
Comment 3 Yanko Kaneti 2002-01-27 14:48:25 UTC 
well what i meant to say is that probably we should have a hidden
temporary pref (off by default) that reverts to the old behavior
Comment 4 Marco Pesenti Gritti 2002-02-22 12:55:59 UTC 
This need to be fixed for 1.1.4, yaneti suggestions sounds ok to me.
But I'm not sure what default you meant to use. Ihmo default should 
definately be old behavior.
Comment 5 Yanko Kaneti 2002-02-22 13:44:35 UTC 
yeah , the old behavior is probably more appropriate at this point
Comment 6 Daniel Erat 2002-02-23 01:30:49 UTC 
Jorn just put the old code into the 1.2 branch.

Marking FIXED, thanks Jorn. :)
Comment 7 Yanko Kaneti 2002-03-04 14:41:15 UTC 
*** Bug 68151 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Yanko Kaneti 2002-03-04 14:46:24 UTC 
*** Bug 73375 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***