After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 695438 - Restore compact view
Restore compact view
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 695027
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: [obsolete] Views: Compact View
3.6.x
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2013-03-08 12:32 UTC by Serrano Pereira
Modified: 2013-03-08 14:03 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Serrano Pereira 2013-03-08 12:32:42 UTC
Compact view was removed in Nautilus 3.6 (see bug 676842), but I think it should be restored because it has some major advantages over icon/list view.

I don't agree with the arguments given in bug 676842 for removing this feature:
1) The compact mode does horrible things like horizontal scrolling.
2) It isn't significantly different from icon mode with labels on the side.

My thoughts on those arguments:
1) It is not clear to me why horizontal scrolling is horrible. I've been using compact mode with horizontal scrolling for years (with both mouse and touchpad) and never had a problem with it.
2) This suggests it can be replaced by the icon view with labels on the right, but I don't see an option for that in Nautilus 3.6.3. Moreover, screenshots posted by Stéphane and amr in bug 676842 clearly show that there is a significant difference in the way files are shown. Compact view makes it much easier to scan through long lists of files and directories (in part thanks to horizontal scrolling).
Comment 1 André Klapper 2013-03-08 12:41:19 UTC
Do you volunteer to maintain that codebase? :)
Comment 2 Juanjo Marín 2013-03-08 13:43:39 UTC
I think this can be considered a duplication of #695027
Comment 3 André Klapper 2013-03-08 13:53:56 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 695027 ***
Comment 4 Serrano Pereira 2013-03-08 14:03:42 UTC
André: I'd have to learn C first (barely started with K&R2).

Juanjo: You are right, it's a duplicate, though I would suggest re-implementing the original code because I don't see what was wrong with it.