After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 676035 - Place web applications in a separate submenu
Place web applications in a separate submenu
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 672574
Product: epiphany
Classification: Core
Component: Web Applications
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Epiphany Maintainers
Epiphany Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2012-05-14 16:54 UTC by Giovanni Campagna
Modified: 2015-03-29 21:17 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
Web application: add a custom category for menu grouping (1.11 KB, patch)
2012-05-14 16:54 UTC, Giovanni Campagna 		none Details | Review

Description Giovanni Campagna 2012-05-14 16:54:09 UTC 
See patch, and see bug 213149 for background.
Comment 1 Giovanni Campagna 2012-05-14 16:54:35 UTC 
Created attachment 214012 [details] [review]
Web application: add a custom category for menu grouping

For technical reasons, it's not possible to add meaningful categories
to saved web applications. To avoid them ending in Other, we add
a special category and submenu for web applications only.
Comment 2 Xan Lopez 2012-05-21 05:50:10 UTC 
See bug #672574, which wants to do something similar to this.
Comment 3 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2012-05-24 17:48:37 UTC 
Giovanni: is there any more specific plan for web applications as a new category? The bug that Xan links contains a migrator for the new category so it is just a matter of picking which category this will be in.

I wonder if your patch is related to some upcoming shell work or something.
Comment 4 William Jon McCann 2013-12-14 13:51:39 UTC 
But 213149 doesn't seem to exist. Where is the background for this patch?
Comment 5 Giovanni Campagna 2013-12-14 14:48:45 UTC 
It's bug 675198 (213149 was the patch, sorry), but there is not much discussion there either.
Comment 6 Michael Catanzaro 2015-03-29 21:17:59 UTC 
Let's use bug #672574 for this.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 672574 ***