GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 655873
High Contrast and High Contrast Inverse Bugs
Last modified: 2012-03-28 01:46:17 UTC
Metabug for tracking all of the High Contrast and High Contrast Inverse theme bugs.
Created attachment 195750 [details] Inverted versions of High Contrast icons (as present in gnome-themes-standard 3.14) These icons can be included in High Contrast Inverse as it exists now, as they do not require any changes to the theme engine in order to function. Other missing icons will be provided via the the symbolic theme, but a theme engine will be necessary so that the color can be set correctly.The new icons I have drawn complete the set (and can hopefully be provided through symbolic as well), but still need to be reviewed and corrected before I submit them. I also noticed that all of the HC Inverse icons currently in the theme are PNG images. These are in SVG format. If this is a problem, please comment and I will provide them in PNG.
Created attachment 196747 [details] High Contrast Icons Missing High Contrast Icons, as well as re-named rtl and ltr variants for gtk stock.
Created attachment 196749 [details] Symbolic-style icons which complete High Contrast and High Contrast Inverse sets when combined with gnome-icon-theme-symbolic These icons complete both High Contrast and High Contrast Inverse sets when combined with gnome-icon-themes-symbolic and the previous two attachments. The design team may wish to edit or provide feedback to me these on changes that are needed before including them.The icons in this attachment and the icons in gnome-icon-themes-symbolic contain colors which must be overridden by a theme engine.
Created attachment 197408 [details] Corrected some mistakes New High Contrast Inverse attachment, previous version contained some mistakes.
I'm going to close this as OBSOLETE, since the work for this is done in gnome-icon-theme-symbolic now (and the HighContrastInverse part of the bug is already tracked by another series of report here in this bugzilla).
Cosimo, we should also close Bug 519336, Bug 519335, Bug 519334, and Bug 518884 as obsolete. Am I allowed to do that?
No, the system won't let me close those bugs. If you don't get to them first, I'll put some comments there so that people know that they are no longer relevant.