After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 619259 - crash in Evolution: Now it crashes at startu...
crash in Evolution: Now it crashes at startu...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 612082
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.30.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
evolution[attachments]
: 619260 619569 619598 619599 619600 619690 619691 619692 619696 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2010-05-21 06:22 UTC by Svante Signell
Modified: 2010-10-01 13:07 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.29/2.30


Description Svante Signell 2010-05-21 06:22:25 UTC 
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Now it crashes at startup, the previewing a mail making this happen! Before restart, evo was frozen tring to preview the same mail!


Distribution: Debian squeeze/sid
Gnome Release: 2.30.0 2010-04-26 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.30.0

System: Linux 2.6.32-3-686 #1 SMP Thu Feb 25 06:14:20 UTC 2010 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10706000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: gnome
GTK+ Modules: gnomebreakpad, canberra-gtk-module

Memory status: size: 217726976 vsize: 217726976 resident: 45621248 share: 22515712 rss: 45621248 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1274422778 rtime: 416 utime: 379 stime: 37 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xad5b0b70 (LWP 28620)]
[New Thread 0xb0284b70 (LWP 28619)]
[New Thread 0xacdafb70 (LWP 28618)]
[New Thread 0xae8fdb70 (LWP 28610)]
[New Thread 0xaf0feb70 (LWP 28609)]
[New Thread 0xaf8ffb70 (LWP 28608)]
[New Thread 0xb0a85b70 (LWP 28606)]
[New Thread 0xb1286b70 (LWP 28605)]
[New Thread 0xb1a8cb70 (LWP 28604)]
[New Thread 0xb228db70 (LWP 28603)]
0xb7799424 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 222028

Thread 4 (Thread 0xacdafb70 (LWP 28618))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __lll_lock_wait
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 _L_lock_881
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 pthread_mutex_lock
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #4 segv_redirect
    at main.c line 288
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 em_format_snoop_type
    at em-format.c line 2021
  • #7 em_format_part_as
    at em-format.c line 659
  • #8 em_format_part
    at em-format.c line 704
  • #9 emf_multipart_mixed
    at em-format.c line 1435
  • #10 em_format_part_as
    at em-format.c line 675
  • #11 em_format_part
    at em-format.c line 704
  • #12 efh_format_message
    at em-format-html.c line 2782
  • #13 efh_format_exec
    at em-format-html.c line 216
  • #14 mail_msg_proxy
    at mail-mt.c line 471
  • #15 g_thread_pool_thread_proxy
    at /build/buildd-glib2.0_2.24.1-1-i386-84Pp4V/glib2.0-2.24.1/glib/gthreadpool.c line 315
  • #16 g_thread_create_proxy
    at /build/buildd-glib2.0_2.24.1-1-i386-84Pp4V/glib2.0-2.24.1/glib/gthread.c line 1893
  • #17 start_thread
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #18 clone
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 

	Inferior 1 [process 28601] will be detached.

Quit anyway? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal]
Comment 1 Akhil Laddha 2010-05-21 07:27:46 UTC 
*** Bug 619260 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Akhil Laddha 2010-05-25 09:50:23 UTC 
*** Bug 619569 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Akhil Laddha 2010-05-25 12:30:10 UTC 
*** Bug 619600 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Akhil Laddha 2010-05-25 12:31:12 UTC 
*** Bug 619598 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Akhil Laddha 2010-05-25 12:32:10 UTC 
*** Bug 619599 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Akhil Laddha 2010-05-26 03:58:06 UTC 
*** Bug 619690 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Akhil Laddha 2010-05-26 03:58:11 UTC 
*** Bug 619691 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Akhil Laddha 2010-05-26 04:36:23 UTC 
*** Bug 619692 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Akhil Laddha 2010-05-26 04:37:57 UTC 
I think it can be marked duplicate of bug 612082 as per 
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612082#c14
Comment 10 Akhil Laddha 2010-05-26 09:42:43 UTC 
*** Bug 619696 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Milan Crha 2010-10-01 13:07:32 UTC 
(In reply to comment #9)
> I think it can be marked duplicate of bug 612082 as per 
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612082#c14

I agree.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 612082 ***