After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 60344 - Menu Editing Is Difficult abd requires command line tasks
Menu Editing Is Difficult abd requires command line tasks
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 83433
Product: gnome-control-center
Classification: Core
Component: Other Preferences
1.5.x
Other Linux
: Normal minor
: GNOME2.0
Assigned To: Control-Center Maintainers
Control-Center Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-09-10 21:37 UTC by aaron
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description aaron 2001-09-10 21:37:25 UTC 
"To add a single item to the Main Menu, do the following:

Open a terminal
su to root
gmenu
learn and use gmenu"

This should be possible without a terminal, and ideally without gmenu,
which is crufty and difficult to use. It would be good to be able to drag
something from the desktop into the menu.  At least to the Favorites menu.
Comment 1 Luis Villa 2002-01-24 17:03:17 UTC 
Very borderline between minor and enhancement...
Comment 2 Luis Villa 2002-01-24 18:35:14 UTC 
Just doing some tagging of files I've already triaged. Filter on 'luis doing
GNOME2 work' to get rid of the spam.
Comment 3 Luis Villa 2002-04-10 02:52:51 UTC 
Updating all cc bugs that have the GNOME2 keyword set to the GNOME2.0 milestone,
to help jrb triage/prioritize cc bugs. Filter on 'luis doing GNOME2 work' to
ignore this spam.
Comment 4 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-06-10 05:22:18 UTC 
Louie:

Shouldn't this either 
a) be closed invalid since we use nautilus for menu editing 
b) be marked a dupe of bug 83433(request for simple menu editing tool)
Comment 5 Luis Villa 2002-06-10 05:24:54 UTC 
Well, that one should have been marked a dup of this one, and/or never
filed in the first place ;) But yeah, that has some useful discussion
on it now.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 83433 ***