After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 554091 - gnome-terminal doesn't render hindi fonts correctly
gnome-terminal doesn't render hindi fonts correctly
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 553871
Product: vte
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: VTE Maintainers
VTE Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-09-27 18:19 UTC by Andrew Clausen
Modified: 2008-10-05 11:20 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.21/2.22


Description Andrew Clausen 2008-09-27 18:19:42 UTC 
Please describe the problem:
gnome-terminal doesn't render the character "कि" correctly.  All other gnome applications work correctly.  Gnome-terminal puts the vertical bar on the left side, rather than the right side.

Details: This character, often transliterated as "ki", is a combination of the character "ka", which is "क", with an "-i" decoration, much like e is decorated with ' to get é in latin languages.  Gnome-terminal incorrectly adds the decoration to the right side, when it should be on the left.

Steps to reproduce:
cut & paste "कि" into gnome-terminal

Actual results:
it's rendered incorrectly.

Expected results:
render the same as other gnome applications (like gedit, xchat, etc.)

Does this happen every time?
yes

Other information:
Comment 1 Andrew Clausen 2008-09-27 18:31:33 UTC 
some versions:
ii  libpango1.0-0                          1.20.5-0ubuntu1
ii  gnome-terminal                         2.22.1-0ubuntu2
Comment 2 Christian Persch 2008-09-27 18:48:41 UTC 
-> vte
Comment 3 Christian Persch 2008-10-04 22:11:51 UTC 
Dup of bug 553871 ?
Comment 4 Andrew Clausen 2008-10-04 22:45:53 UTC 
Yes, looks like a duplicate.

The bugzilla search tool doesn't work, so I couldn't look for duplicates.  It's been down for a week?!
Comment 5 Christian Persch 2008-10-05 11:20:11 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 553871 ***