After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 54535 - screensaver-properties-capplet doesn't work well
screensaver-properties-capplet doesn't work well
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 53989
Product: gnome-control-center
Classification: Core
Component: [obsolete] screensaver
unspecified
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Control-Center Maintainers
Control-Center Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-05-12 11:46 UTC by hopper
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description hopper 2001-05-12 11:46:25 UTC
Package: control-center
Severity: normal
Version: control-center-1.4.0.1-ximian.5
Synopsis: screensaver-properties-capplet doesn't work well
Bugzilla-Product: control-center
Bugzilla-Component: general

Description:
There are many parts of this program which work suboptimally, but I have two particularily strong annoyances.

First, the 'Use power management' checkbox no longer works under Ximian GNOME 1.4.  I had at first thought this a problem with xscreensaver itself until I run xscreensaver-demo and turned it on from there and had it start working.

Second, the 'Demo' button does not work for all of the screensavers in the list.  xscreensaver-demo is able to run all existing screensavers in demo mode.

My other problem is more a lack of features than a bug.  Not all parameters of all screensavers are well supported.




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2001-05-12 07:46 -------

The original reporter (hopper@monster.omnifarious.org) of this bug does not have an account here.
Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Reassigning to the default owner of the component, control-center-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.

Comment 1 Rachel Hestilow 2001-09-13 02:18:02 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 53989 ***