GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 512789
crash in Open Folder:
Last modified: 2008-01-29 18:21:02 UTC
Version: 2.20.0 What were you doing when the application crashed? Distribution: Debian lenny/sid Gnome Release: 2.20.3 2008-01-12 (Debian) BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1 System: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 #1 SMP Mon Nov 12 08:32:57 UTC 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10400090 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: LiNsta2 Icon Theme: glass-icons Memory status: size: 73158656 vsize: 73158656 resident: 21196800 share: 14422016 rss: 21196800 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1201612259 rtime: 152 utime: 136 stime: 16 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus' Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1". [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xb6b9f6c0 (LWP 32114)] 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 187195
Thread 1 (Thread 0xb6b9f6c0 (LWP 32114))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- <gtk.gdk.Pixbuf object at 0xb6f717d4 (GdkPixbuf at 0x838d338)> <gtk.gdk.Pixbuf object at 0xb6f717d4 (GdkPixbuf at 0x82cdd18)> <gtk.gdk.Pixbuf object at 0xb6f717d4 (GdkPixbuf at 0x82cdd18)> <gtk.gdk.Pixbuf object at 0xb6f717d4 (GdkPixbuf at 0x838d338)> <gtk.gdk.Pixbuf object at 0xb6f717d4 (GdkPixbuf at 0x82cdd50)> <gtk. (PySwitcher.py:10288): Wnck-CRITICAL **: update_client_list: assertion `reentrancy_guard == 0' failed (PySwitcher.py:10288): Wnck-CRITICAL **: update_client_list: assertion `reentrancy_guard == 0' failed (PySwitcher.py:10288): Wnck-CRITICAL **: update_client_list: assertion `reentrancy_guard == 0' failed (PySwitcher.py:10288): Wnck-CRITICAL **: update_client_list: assertion `reentrancy_guard == 0' failed (PySwitcher.py:10288): Wnck-CRITICAL **: update_client_list: assertion `reentrancy_guard == 0' failed --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 480179 ***