Bug 480179 – crash in gconf_client_remove_dir [UNMAINTAINED]

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 480179 - crash in gconf_client_remove_dir [UNMAINTAINED]


Summary:	crash in gconf_client_remove_dir [UNMAINTAINED]


Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Product:	filemanager-actions
Classification:	Other
Component:	general
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	Immediate blocker
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nautilus-actions Maintainer(s)
QA Contact:	Nautilus-actions Maintainer(s)

URL:
Whiteboard:

Duplicates:	481533 481738 482815 496332 503500 503900 506417 512344 512480 512638 512789 515991 517602 517604 520322 520380 524063 524413 524462 524463 524597 524794 524799 524803 525591 525817 525819 525906 525925 525926 525933 526182 526184 526596 526764 526847 526849 527322 527703 528001 528109 528391 529024 529292 529466 529688 529834 530256 530377 530468 531244 531292 531822 533556 534285 536064 536866 537136 537188 537307 537662 537870 537948 538487 538536 538702 539119 539299 539303 539328 539407 539408 539409 539478 539742 541299 541317 541402 541778 543509 543543 543835 544084 544087 544742 545421 545922 546564 546566 547341 547517 548112 548323 549185 549190 549324 549384 549388 549391 549842 550063 550094 550552 550958 551462 551479 552495 552970 553039 554062 554370 554955 555059 555485 555975 556356 556366 557133 558052 558290 558758 559577 559609 560527 560689 562076 563514 563593 563662 564085 566271 566763 566930 567075 568112 568247 568444 568918 569137 570875 570935 572654 572836 573861 573872 574313 575144 575979 576292 577068 582814 609061 652445 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-09-25 11:56 UTC by panmanphil
Modified:	2011-06-13 11:15 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.19/2.20

Description panmanphil 2007-09-25 11:56:23 UTC

Version: 2.20.0

What were you doing when the application crashed?
started monodevelop after doing an update with synaptic


Distribution: Debian lenny/sid
Gnome Release: 2.20.0 2007-09-21 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.20.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-2-686 #1 SMP Wed Jul 11 03:53:02 UTC 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10400000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Gorilla
Icon Theme: Gorilla

Memory status: size: 66498560 vsize: 66498560 resident: 9625600 share: 7983104 rss: 9625600 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1190721262 rtime: 21 utime: 18 stime: 3 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb6b616c0 (LWP 4048)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xb75ffbf1 in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0

+ Trace 165333

Thread 1 (Thread 0xb6b616c0 (LWP 4048))

#0 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#1 g_spawn_sync
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#2 g_spawn_command_line_sync
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#3 ??
from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
#4 <signal handler called>
#5 gconf_client_remove_dir
from /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4
#6 ??
from /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0/libnautilus-actions.so
#7 ??
#8 ??
from /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0/libnautilus-actions.so
#9 ??
#0 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0



----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
/etc/gdm/PreSession/Default: Registering your session with wtmp and utmp
/etc/gdm/PreSession/Default: running: /usr/bin/sessreg -a -w /var/log/wtmp -u /var/run/utmp -x "/var/lib/gdm/:0.Xservers" -h "" -l ":0" "panmanphil"
/etc/gdm/Xsession: Beginning session setup...
SESSION_MANAGER=local/cyber2:/tmp/.ICE-unix/3963
Window manager warning: 0 stored in GConf key /apps/metacity/general/num_workspaces is not a reasonable number of workspaces, current maximum is 36
Window manager warning: 0 stored in GConf key /desktop/gnome/peripherals/mouse/cursor_size is not a reasonable cursor_size; must be in the range 1..128
Usage - gnome-control-center [-h]
Options: -h : hide on start
	Useful if you want to autostart the control-center singleton so it can get all its slow loading done
No value set for `/desktop/gnome/applications/at/visual/exec'
** Message: failed to load session from /home/panmanphil/.nautilus/saved-session-O58RTT
Unable to open desktop file /usr/share/applications/gaim.desktop for panel launcher: No such file or directory
** (gnome-panel:4047): WARNING **: panel-applet-frame.c:1278: failed to load applet OAFIID:GNOME_MultiLoadApplet:
Failed to resolve, or extend '!prefs_key=/apps/panel/applets/applet_4/prefs;background=none:;orient=up;size=x-small;locked_down=false
--------------------------------------------------

Comment 1 Susana 2007-10-06 10:33:25 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, the stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to
solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash.

Could you please help fixing this by installing some debugging packages [1],
start the application as normal, and try to reproduce the crash, if possible?

Once bug-buddy pops up, you can find the stacktrace in the 'Details', now
containing way more information. Please copy that stacktrace and paste it as a
comment here. Thanks in advance!

[1] Please install debug packages for nautilus, glib2, gtk2, pango, gnome-vfs2,
libgnome, and libgnomeui.

More details can be found here: http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces

Comment 2 Susana 2007-10-06 10:33:27 UTC

*** Bug 481738 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Susana 2007-10-06 10:33:30 UTC

*** Bug 482815 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Susana 2007-12-16 19:11:24 UTC

*** Bug 503500 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Susana 2007-12-16 21:09:05 UTC

*** Bug 503900 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Cosimo Cecchi 2007-12-30 14:02:33 UTC

*** Bug 506417 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-01-27 11:56:05 UTC

*** Bug 512344 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Gianluca Borello 2008-01-28 09:11:25 UTC

*** Bug 512480 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 9 Gianluca Borello 2008-01-28 20:09:25 UTC

*** Bug 512638 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 10 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-01-29 18:21:02 UTC

*** Bug 512789 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 11 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-02-12 18:01:25 UTC

*** Bug 515991 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 12 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-02-12 18:02:53 UTC

-> nautilus-actions.

Better trace from bug #515991:

+ Trace 188980

#0 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#1 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#2 <signal handler called>
#3 gconf_client_remove_dir
from /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4
#4 nautilus_actions_config_gconf_reader_get
from /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0/libnautilus-actions.so
#5 g_object_unref
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#6 nautilus_actions_register_type
from /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0/libnautilus-actions.so
#7 g_object_unref
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8 nautilus_module_extension_list_free
#9 eel_debug_shut_down
from /usr/lib/libeel-2-2.20.so
#10 POA_Nautilus_MetafileMonitor__init
#11 __libc_start_main
from /lib/libc.so.6
#12 ??


This seems a crash in the nautilus-actions extension, so reassigning.

Comment 13 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-02-20 10:45:43 UTC

*** Bug 517604 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 14 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-02-20 10:46:58 UTC

*** Bug 517602 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 15 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-02-20 10:48:26 UTC

I think this could be the same crash as in bug #496332

Comment 16 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-03-04 20:29:59 UTC

*** Bug 520322 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 17 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-03-04 20:31:46 UTC

*** Bug 496332 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 18 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-03-04 20:32:10 UTC

Even better trace from dup bug #496332.

+ Trace 191300

#8 <signal handler called>
#9 gconf_client_remove_dir
at gconf-client.c line 705
#10 nautilus_actions_config_gconf_reader_finalize
at nautilus-actions-config-gconf-reader.c line 63
#11 g_object_unref
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 nautilus_actions_instance_dispose
at nautilus-actions.c line 178
#13 g_object_unref
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 nautilus_module_extension_list_free
at nautilus-module.c line 250
#15 eel_debug_shut_down
from /usr/lib/libeel-2.so.2
#16 main
at nautilus-main.c line 563
#17 __libc_start_main
from /lib/libc.so.6
#18 _start
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 19 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-03-04 23:06:42 UTC

*** Bug 520380 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 20 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-03-24 14:05:25 UTC

*** Bug 524063 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 21 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-03-26 10:25:55 UTC

*** Bug 524413 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 22 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-03-26 10:27:52 UTC

Confirming for the many duplicates.

Comment 23 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-03-26 10:52:07 UTC

*** Bug 524463 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 24 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-03-26 10:52:16 UTC

*** Bug 524462 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 25 Gianluca Borello 2008-03-27 09:46:36 UTC

*** Bug 524597 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 26 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-03-29 18:24:08 UTC

*** Bug 524803 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 27 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-03-29 18:24:14 UTC

*** Bug 524799 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 28 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-03-31 18:09:55 UTC

*** Bug 524794 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 29 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-04-03 00:37:41 UTC

*** Bug 525817 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 30 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-04-03 00:37:51 UTC

*** Bug 525819 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 31 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-04-03 12:02:23 UTC

*** Bug 525906 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 32 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-04-03 12:02:29 UTC

*** Bug 525925 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 33 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-04-03 12:02:50 UTC

*** Bug 525926 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 34 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-04-03 12:03:21 UTC

*** Bug 525933 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 35 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-04-04 10:51:33 UTC

*** Bug 525591 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 36 Baptiste Mille-Mathias 2008-04-04 16:26:51 UTC

*** Bug 526184 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 37 Baptiste Mille-Mathias 2008-04-04 16:27:17 UTC

*** Bug 526182 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 38 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-04-08 08:12:49 UTC

*** Bug 526847 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 39 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-04-08 08:12:55 UTC

*** Bug 526849 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 40 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-04-08 08:22:22 UTC

*** Bug 526764 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 41 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-04-08 08:29:02 UTC

*** Bug 526596 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 42 Gianluca Borello 2008-04-11 10:48:03 UTC

*** Bug 527322 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 43 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-04-13 09:40:20 UTC

*** Bug 527703 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 44 Gianluca Borello 2008-04-14 17:21:51 UTC

*** Bug 528001 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 45 Gianluca Borello 2008-04-15 07:25:32 UTC

*** Bug 528109 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 46 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-04-16 12:39:21 UTC

*** Bug 528391 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 47 Gianluca Borello 2008-04-20 14:33:26 UTC

*** Bug 529024 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 48 Gianluca Borello 2008-04-22 17:28:02 UTC

*** Bug 529292 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 49 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-04-23 09:35:55 UTC

*** Bug 529466 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 50 Gianluca Borello 2008-04-24 11:58:28 UTC

*** Bug 529688 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 51 Gianluca Borello 2008-04-25 10:00:08 UTC

*** Bug 529834 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 52 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-04-27 22:24:38 UTC

*** Bug 530256 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 53 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-04-28 18:06:08 UTC

*** Bug 530377 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 54 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-04-29 07:15:51 UTC

*** Bug 530468 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 55 A. Walton 2008-05-03 22:10:26 UTC

*** Bug 531292 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 56 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-05-04 10:57:06 UTC

*** Bug 531244 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 57 A. Walton 2008-05-06 20:13:13 UTC

*** Bug 531822 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 58 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-05-17 13:40:10 UTC

*** Bug 533556 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 59 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-05-22 09:17:01 UTC

*** Bug 534285 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 60 A. Walton 2008-06-02 09:06:39 UTC

*** Bug 536064 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 61 A. Walton 2008-06-05 20:58:17 UTC

*** Bug 536866 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 62 A. Walton 2008-06-08 04:14:50 UTC

*** Bug 537136 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 63 A. Walton 2008-06-08 04:20:11 UTC

*** Bug 537188 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 64 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-06-09 09:34:37 UTC

*** Bug 537307 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 65 Susana 2008-06-10 23:35:09 UTC

*** Bug 537662 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 66 A. Walton 2008-06-11 21:46:19 UTC

*** Bug 537870 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 67 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-06-12 14:43:30 UTC

*** Bug 537948 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 68 Gianluca Borello 2008-06-15 22:55:16 UTC

*** Bug 538487 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 69 A. Walton 2008-06-16 15:21:30 UTC

*** Bug 538536 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 70 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-06-17 07:49:47 UTC

*** Bug 538702 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 71 Gianluca Borello 2008-06-19 13:00:55 UTC

*** Bug 539119 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 72 A. Walton 2008-06-20 17:09:26 UTC

*** Bug 539299 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 73 A. Walton 2008-06-20 17:10:02 UTC

*** Bug 539303 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 74 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-06-21 10:00:50 UTC

*** Bug 539407 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 75 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-06-21 10:01:07 UTC

*** Bug 539408 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 76 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-06-21 10:01:16 UTC

*** Bug 539409 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 77 A. Walton 2008-06-21 21:36:51 UTC

*** Bug 539478 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 78 Gianluca Borello 2008-06-23 13:12:47 UTC

*** Bug 539742 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 79 Frederic Ruaudel 2008-07-02 16:14:31 UTC

Sorry to disappoint you, but there is very little chance for a fix of this bug since I have no more time to give to this project.

The only solutions I can give you is :

1) Uninstall N-A
2) Become the new project leader of N-A and fix the bug by yourself (more info here : http://www.grumz.net/?q=node/318)

Thanks for your understanding

Comment 80 A. Walton 2008-07-02 23:16:49 UTC

*** Bug 541299 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 81 A. Walton 2008-07-02 23:18:14 UTC

*** Bug 541317 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 82 A. Walton 2008-07-03 15:29:58 UTC

*** Bug 541402 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 83 A. Walton 2008-07-06 21:23:41 UTC

*** Bug 541778 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 84 Gianluca Borello 2008-07-18 08:23:44 UTC

*** Bug 543509 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 85 Gianluca Borello 2008-07-18 08:23:50 UTC

*** Bug 543543 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 86 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-07-20 17:16:41 UTC

*** Bug 543835 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 87 Gianluca Borello 2008-07-22 07:30:27 UTC

*** Bug 544087 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 88 Gianluca Borello 2008-07-22 07:30:49 UTC

*** Bug 544084 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 89 A. Walton 2008-07-25 19:26:51 UTC

*** Bug 544742 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 90 A. Walton 2008-07-30 15:52:28 UTC

*** Bug 545421 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 91 Gianluca Borello 2008-08-02 10:58:35 UTC

*** Bug 545922 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 92 Gianluca Borello 2008-08-06 15:26:38 UTC

*** Bug 546564 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 93 Gianluca Borello 2008-08-06 15:26:44 UTC

*** Bug 546566 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 94 A. Walton 2008-08-11 20:50:18 UTC

*** Bug 547341 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 95 panmanphil 2008-08-12 00:21:09 UTC

I am not sure how to verify this, but it seems that by installing gnome-core this problem seems to have gone away. Previously I was using a stripped down system and didn't have it, but tried this. If others could verify, it might just mean adding another dependency.

Comment 96 A. Walton 2008-08-13 16:50:06 UTC

*** Bug 547517 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 97 A. Walton 2008-08-18 15:05:36 UTC

*** Bug 548112 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 98 Susana 2008-08-19 15:53:50 UTC

*** Bug 548323 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 99 A. Walton 2008-08-24 12:11:25 UTC

*** Bug 549185 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 100 A. Walton 2008-08-24 12:11:44 UTC

*** Bug 549190 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 101 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-08-26 10:04:37 UTC

*** Bug 549324 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 102 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-08-26 10:07:53 UTC

*** Bug 549384 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 103 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-08-26 10:09:24 UTC

*** Bug 549388 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 104 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-08-26 10:09:31 UTC

*** Bug 549391 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 105 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-08-26 11:06:47 UTC

*** Bug 481533 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 106 A. Walton 2008-08-29 21:27:39 UTC

*** Bug 549842 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 107 Allan Day 2008-08-31 21:14:59 UTC

*** Bug 550063 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 108 Sergio Infante Montero 2008-09-01 06:36:52 UTC

*** Bug 550094 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 109 Sergio Infante Montero 2008-09-03 16:37:14 UTC

*** Bug 550552 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 110 André Klapper 2008-09-06 18:27:56 UTC

*** Bug 550958 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 111 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-09-09 12:09:02 UTC

*** Bug 551479 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 112 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-09-09 12:09:09 UTC

*** Bug 551462 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 113 André Klapper 2008-09-12 14:07:20 UTC

Is somebody able to provide a valgrind log for this so we can track this down?

Any volunteers' help really appreciated, because this module is unmaintained.

Comment 114 Chris 2008-09-12 14:47:00 UTC

(In reply to comment #113)
> Is somebody able to provide a valgrind log for this so we can track this down?
> 
> Any volunteers' help really appreciated, because this module is unmaintained.
> 

I can help out but need some directions.

This bug manifests in more than one way.  Sometimes a bug reporting window pops up, but often Nautilus simply vanishes from the Gnome desktop and takes down any other GUI applications that are running at the time (IceDove, Terminal, etc).

When the crash takes place, the processes are often still running but no longer appear on the Gnome desktop.  Nautilus must be manually killed to get it to restart.

Can you tell me how to run a valgrind log on Nautilus?  I'll be glad to run any other diagnostics you like to help locate this problem.

Comment 115 A. Walton 2008-09-18 23:47:09 UTC

*** Bug 552495 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 116 Susana 2008-09-20 11:15:29 UTC

*** Bug 552970 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 117 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-09-24 09:56:20 UTC

*** Bug 553039 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 118 Heikki Paajanen 2008-09-26 18:37:04 UTC

This seems to be caused by incorrect declaration of NautilusActionsConfigGconfReader struct. The parent should be NautilusActionsConfigGconf instead of NautilusActionsConfig. Because of that a write to  NautilusActionsConfigGconfReader->actions_notify_id overwrites NautilusActionsConfigGconf->conf_client which then causes a crash next time it is used.

This is also apparently fixed in svn version over a year ago.

Comment 119 Susana 2008-09-27 12:46:22 UTC

*** Bug 554062 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 120 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-09-30 07:49:19 UTC

*** Bug 554370 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 121 André Klapper 2008-09-30 18:02:46 UTC

Heikki: Great, thanks for the investigations! Any SVN revision?

Looks like we just need a (non-maintainer) release for nautilus-actions then if the fix is already in but no release containing it.

grumz, do you have time for a last 1.4.2 release from the current SVN code? :-)

Unfortunately, Nautilus-actions does not use ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/ , but http://www.grumz.net/index.php?q=node/5 .
Otherwise might be easier to have a non-maintainer release if grumz doesn't have time at all...

Comment 122 Heikki Paajanen 2008-10-01 14:40:51 UTC

(In reply to comment #121)
> Heikki: Great, thanks for the investigations! Any SVN revision?

It was fixed in 480

Comment 123 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-10-02 12:06:15 UTC

Ok, then we can close this as FIXED. I am in contact with Frederic (the main developer) and I think I'll make a release with this fix soon.

Comment 124 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-10-04 08:47:32 UTC

*** Bug 554955 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 125 palfrey 2008-10-08 15:41:56 UTC

*** Bug 555485 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 126 palfrey 2008-10-08 16:04:43 UTC

*** Bug 555059 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 127 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-10-12 14:50:53 UTC

*** Bug 555975 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 128 André Klapper 2008-10-16 09:25:34 UTC

*** Bug 556366 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 129 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-10-18 14:33:43 UTC

*** Bug 556356 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 130 C de-Avillez 2008-10-18 18:20:13 UTC

Just a comment: since the fixed code has not yet been released, is it correct to have the bug CLOSED/RESOLVED? I can understand it if the fixed code were to be released in a few days at most, but it's been more than 2 weeks now.

Comment 131 André Klapper 2008-10-18 18:43:23 UTC

From a QA point of view: Bug fixed in the codebase means that bug is resolved. This is unrelated to any potential tarball releases.

Comment 132 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-10-21 08:18:53 UTC

*** Bug 557133 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 133 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-10-27 09:59:04 UTC

*** Bug 558052 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 134 A. Walton 2008-10-28 19:53:12 UTC

*** Bug 558290 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 135 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-11-01 12:24:22 UTC

*** Bug 558758 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 136 A. Walton 2008-11-06 11:14:59 UTC

*** Bug 559577 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 137 A. Walton 2008-11-06 15:23:41 UTC

*** Bug 559609 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 138 palfrey 2008-11-13 14:07:58 UTC

*** Bug 560527 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 139 palfrey 2008-11-14 19:27:17 UTC

*** Bug 560689 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 140 palfrey 2008-11-24 20:10:43 UTC

*** Bug 562076 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 141 André Klapper 2008-12-08 21:17:36 UTC

*** Bug 563514 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 142 André Klapper 2008-12-08 21:17:40 UTC

*** Bug 563662 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 143 André Klapper 2008-12-08 21:17:40 UTC

*** Bug 539328 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 144 André Klapper 2008-12-08 21:19:43 UTC

*** Bug 563593 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 145 Cosimo Cecchi 2009-01-02 11:02:03 UTC

*** Bug 566271 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 146 Gianluca Borello 2009-01-06 12:48:48 UTC

*** Bug 566763 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 147 palfrey 2009-01-08 12:13:00 UTC

*** Bug 564085 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 148 palfrey 2009-01-08 12:13:02 UTC

*** Bug 566930 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 149 A. Walton 2009-01-09 13:45:07 UTC

*** Bug 567075 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 150 A. Walton 2009-01-17 18:51:54 UTC

*** Bug 568112 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 151 A. Walton 2009-01-19 01:02:24 UTC

*** Bug 568247 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 152 palfrey 2009-01-20 16:52:15 UTC

*** Bug 568444 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 153 A. Walton 2009-01-24 02:13:00 UTC

*** Bug 568918 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 154 palfrey 2009-01-26 11:37:29 UTC

*** Bug 569137 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 155 Cosimo Cecchi 2009-02-08 14:54:40 UTC

*** Bug 570935 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 156 Cosimo Cecchi 2009-02-08 14:57:24 UTC

*** Bug 570875 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 157 Fabio Durán Verdugo 2009-02-21 21:14:10 UTC

*** Bug 572654 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 158 Fabio Durán Verdugo 2009-02-23 11:30:18 UTC

*** Bug 572836 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 159 Cosimo Cecchi 2009-03-03 10:35:29 UTC

*** Bug 573872 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 160 Cosimo Cecchi 2009-03-03 10:35:35 UTC

*** Bug 573861 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 161 André Klapper 2009-03-03 10:40:25 UTC

(In reply to comment #123)
> Ok, then we can close this as FIXED. I am in contact with Frederic (the main
> developer) and I think I'll make a release with this fix soon.

If this happened, where is the tarball located exactly?
I'm getting tired of the Debian noise here.

Comment 162 Fabio Durán Verdugo 2009-03-05 22:59:45 UTC

*** Bug 574313 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 163 Fabio Durán Verdugo 2009-03-12 23:05:20 UTC

*** Bug 575144 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 164 Cosimo Cecchi 2009-03-19 15:58:23 UTC

*** Bug 575979 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 165 André Klapper 2009-03-25 15:10:54 UTC

*** Bug 576292 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 166 Gianluca Borello 2009-03-28 12:53:33 UTC

*** Bug 577068 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 167 Gianluca Borello 2009-05-15 22:53:02 UTC

*** Bug 582814 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 168 Pierre Wieser 2009-05-16 22:13:22 UTC

Hi all,

I believed have read the bugzilla, but obviously I was missing this entry ;-(

As the new nautilus-actions maintainer, I am currently preparing a new release.

there will be No new features there, but hopefully we will find all fixes committed in svn/git since two years.

Regards
Pierre

oh - yes, I'll try to distribute in ftp.gnome.org -

Comment 169 Akhil Laddha 2009-10-27 03:56:31 UTC

bug 599711 against 2.28.1 seems to be dupe of this bug. In this case bug 480179 should be reopened.

Comment 170 Pierre Wieser 2009-10-27 09:31:42 UTC

I do not agree
What would be the rationale behind "I reopen a closed bug because someone always uses an old version" ?

Comment 171 Akhil Laddha 2009-10-27 10:10:30 UTC

@Pierre, I thought user has filed bug against 2.28.1 and in this version user is getting crash though it has fix applied.

Comment 172 Pierre Wieser 2009-10-27 10:18:36 UTC

Akhil,
2.28.1 is the Gnome version, but surely not the Nautilus Action version. I've asked the reporter for his exact version number. I would be amazed if this was a recent one.
But, if there is a crash with the fix applied, shouldn't it be a new bug ?
Regards
Pierre

Comment 173 Akhil Laddha 2010-02-05 11:18:28 UTC

*** Bug 609061 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 174 Akhil Laddha 2011-06-13 03:17:00 UTC

bug 652319 against nautilus-actions-1.4.1

Comment 175 André Klapper 2011-06-13 11:15:12 UTC

*** Bug 652445 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***