After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 485994 - crash in Tasks: navegando nos e-mails
crash in Tasks: navegando nos e-mails
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 433573
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Tasks
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-10-12 11:25 UTC by robvianna
Modified: 2007-10-15 09:23 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description robvianna 2007-10-12 11:25:47 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
navegando nos e-mails


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:35:01 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 133816320 vsize: 133816320 resident: 38862848 share: 21864448 rss: 38862848 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1192187118 rtime: 1694 utime: 1582 stime: 112 cutime:36 cstime: 15 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208539424 (LWP 3499)]
[New Thread -1279911024 (LWP 3928)]
[New Thread -1290400880 (LWP 3927)]
[New Thread -1242973296 (LWP 3575)]
[New Thread -1308132464 (LWP 3564)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00709402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1208539424 (LWP 3499))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 ??
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_slice_free1
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_slist_free_1
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_slist_remove
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #15 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #16 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #17 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #21 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 gtk_widget_unparent
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #26 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #27 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #29 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #30 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #31 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #32 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #33 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #34 gtk_container_remove
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #35 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #36 g_object_run_dispose
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #37 gtk_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #38 gtk_widget_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #39 bonobo_ui_engine_prune_widget_info
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #40 ??
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #41 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__POINTER
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #42 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #43 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #44 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #45 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #46 ??
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #47 ??
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #48 bonobo_ui_xml_rm
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #49 bonobo_ui_engine_xml_rm
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #50 ??
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #51 _ORBIT_skel_small_Bonobo_UIContainer_removeNode
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #52 ORBit_c_stub_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
  • #53 Bonobo_UIContainer_removeNode
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #54 ??
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #55 bonobo_ui_component_rm
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #56 gal_view_menus_unmerge
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libmenus.so.0
  • #57 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libmenus.so.0
  • #58 g_object_unref
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #59 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #60 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #61 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #62 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #63 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #64 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #65 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #66 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #67 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #68 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #69 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #70 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Akhil Laddha 2007-10-15 09:23:45 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but
the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer
the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 433573 ***