After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 433573 - crash in 3x?? / g_s/g_s / g_slist_remove / 3x??
crash in 3x?? / g_s/g_s / g_slist_remove / 3x??
Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Tasks
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 444978 450989 452270 452356 452371 454060 457707 457867 459924 461864 463858 464485 466772 467078 469111 469669 470349 470746 470909 471135 476047 485994 494716 498559 498960 505346 518956 519760 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-04-26 10:56 UTC by rpschumbo
Modified: 2008-07-07 16:02 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description rpschumbo 2007-04-26 10:56:41 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
I'm just with mozilla and evolution opened.


Distribution: Fedora release 6.93 (Rawhide)
Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.20-1.3104.fc7 #1 SMP Sat Apr 21 22:20:43 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10299905
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 168288256 vsize: 168288256 resident: 41066496 share: 23941120 rss: 41066496 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1177581207 rtime: 3451 utime: 2843 stime: 608 cutime:0 cstime: 3 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208457504 (LWP 3500)]
[New Thread -1335202928 (LWP 4682)]
[New Thread -1291744368 (LWP 4681)]
[New Thread -1312724080 (LWP 3533)]
[New Thread -1323213936 (LWP 3531)]
[New Thread -1240056944 (LWP 3520)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00eb3402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1208457504 (LWP 3500))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 ??
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_slice_free1
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_slist_free_1
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_slist_remove
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #15 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #16 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #17 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #21 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 gtk_widget_unparent
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #26 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #27 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #29 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #30 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #31 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #32 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #33 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #34 gtk_container_remove
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #35 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #36 g_object_run_dispose
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #37 gtk_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #38 gtk_widget_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #39 bonobo_ui_engine_prune_widget_info
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #40 ??
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #41 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__POINTER
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #42 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #43 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #44 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #45 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #46 ??
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #47 ??
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #48 bonobo_ui_xml_rm
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #49 bonobo_ui_engine_xml_rm
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #50 ??
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #51 _ORBIT_skel_small_Bonobo_UIContainer_removeNode
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #52 ORBit_c_stub_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
  • #53 Bonobo_UIContainer_removeNode
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #54 ??
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #55 bonobo_ui_component_rm
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #56 gal_view_menus_unmerge
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libmenus.so.0
  • #57 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libmenus.so.0
  • #58 g_object_unref
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #59 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #60 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #61 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #62 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #63 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #64 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #65 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #66 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #67 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #68 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #69 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #70 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors (85 sec old) ---------------------
bbdb: Could not parse Gaim buddy list.
bbdb: Buddy list has changed since last sync.
bbdb: Could not parse Gaim buddy list.
bbdb: Buddy list has changed since last sync.
bbdb: Could not parse Gaim buddy list.
bbdb: Buddy list has changed since last sync.
bbdb: Could not parse Gaim buddy list.
(evolution:3500): e-data-server-ui-DEBUG: ep_msg_send: in main thread? 0
(evolution:3500): e-data-server-ui-DEBUG: ep_msg_send: in main thread? 0
(evolution:3500): e-data-server-ui-DEBUG: ep_msg_send: in main thread? 0
(evolution:3500): e-data-server-ui-DEBUG: ep_msg_send: in main thread? 0
(evolution:3500): e-data-server-ui-DEBUG: ep_msg_send: in main thread? 0
(evolution:3500): e-data-server-ui-DEBUG: ep_msg_send: in main thread? 0
bbdb: Buddy list has changed since last sync.
bbdb: Could not parse Gaim buddy list.
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 palfrey 2007-04-26 13:36:36 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot
to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash.
Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see
http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so.
Thanks in advance!
Comment 2 Akhil Laddha 2007-06-07 09:20:59 UTC
*** Bug 444978 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 palfrey 2007-06-26 17:10:38 UTC
*** Bug 450989 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 palfrey 2007-06-30 15:22:27 UTC
*** Bug 452356 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 palfrey 2007-06-30 15:22:29 UTC
*** Bug 452371 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 palfrey 2007-07-06 14:44:03 UTC
*** Bug 454060 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 André Klapper 2007-07-27 00:00:15 UTC
*** Bug 452270 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Susana 2007-07-29 20:10:41 UTC
*** Bug 457707 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Susana 2007-07-29 20:11:04 UTC
*** Bug 457867 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 palfrey 2007-08-17 13:14:16 UTC
*** Bug 459924 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 palfrey 2007-08-22 13:17:15 UTC
*** Bug 469111 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Suman Manjunath 2007-09-04 03:34:27 UTC
*** Bug 466772 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Suman Manjunath 2007-09-04 03:36:31 UTC
*** Bug 463858 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14 Suman Manjunath 2007-09-04 03:37:24 UTC
*** Bug 461864 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Suman Manjunath 2007-09-04 03:40:01 UTC
*** Bug 470909 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16 Suman Manjunath 2007-09-04 03:40:38 UTC
*** Bug 471135 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17 Suman Manjunath 2007-09-04 03:41:41 UTC
*** Bug 470349 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18 Suman Manjunath 2007-09-04 03:43:09 UTC
*** Bug 470746 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 19 Suman Manjunath 2007-09-04 03:45:49 UTC
*** Bug 469669 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 20 Suman Manjunath 2007-09-04 03:47:07 UTC
*** Bug 467078 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 21 Suman Manjunath 2007-09-04 03:50:20 UTC
*** Bug 464485 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 22 Suman Manjunath 2007-09-04 03:58:26 UTC
is this related to bug #438139 ?
Comment 23 Suman Manjunath 2007-09-04 04:23:52 UTC
(In reply to comment #17)
> *** Bug 470349 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
> 
(In reply to comment #18)
> *** Bug 470746 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
> 
the traces of these match that of bug #438139 even more closely.. which I had not seen earlier.. 
Comment 24 superduperlamer 2007-09-11 20:22:06 UTC
(In reply to comment #15)
> *** Bug 470909 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

You mentioned that I should come to this bug to answer questions for you.
We you refering to a stack trace with debugging symbols?
Let me know and I'll look into it.  Anything else you need?

Comment 25 André Klapper 2007-09-11 20:54:01 UTC
Yes, a stacktrace wit debug symbols would be great here.
Could you please install some debugging packages [1], start the application as normal, and reproduce the crash, if possible?

Once bug-buddy pops up, you can find the stacktrace in the Details, now containing way more information. Please copy that stacktrace and paste it as a comment here. Thanks in advance!

[1] debugging packages for evolution, evolution-data-server, gtkhtml, gtk, glib, gnome-vfs, pango, libgnome and libgnomeui (as far as those packages are provided by your distribution). More details can be found here: http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces
Comment 26 Suman Manjunath 2007-09-29 18:46:08 UTC
*** Bug 476047 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 27 Akhil Laddha 2007-10-15 09:23:45 UTC
*** Bug 485994 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 28 palfrey 2007-11-08 16:42:44 UTC
*** Bug 494716 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 29 palfrey 2007-11-20 19:33:23 UTC
*** Bug 498559 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 30 Akhil Laddha 2007-11-23 05:22:00 UTC
*** Bug 498960 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 31 Akhil Laddha 2008-02-11 05:05:06 UTC
*** Bug 505346 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 32 Akhil Laddha 2008-02-28 05:49:43 UTC
trace attached in bug 518956

No symbol table info available.
  • #37 Bonobo_UIContainer_removeNode
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #38 ??
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #39 bonobo_ui_component_rm
    from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #40 gal_view_menus_unmerge
    at gal-view-menus.c line 491
  • #41 gal_view_menus_finalize
    at gal-view-menus.c line 153
  • #42 g_object_unref
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #43 emfv_setup_view_instance
    at em-folder-view.c line 556
  • #44 emfv_set_folder
    at em-folder-view.c line 676
  • #45 emfb_set_folder
    at em-folder-browser.c line 1838
  • #46 emfv_got_folder
    at em-folder-view.c line 691
  • #47 get_folder_done
    at mail-ops.c line 1198
  • #48 mail_msg_idle_cb
    at mail-mt.c line 480
  • #49 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0

Comment 33 Akhil Laddha 2008-02-28 05:50:00 UTC
*** Bug 518956 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 34 Akhil Laddha 2008-03-04 15:20:19 UTC
*** Bug 519760 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 35 Tobias Mueller 2008-07-07 16:02:58 UTC
Closing this bug report as no further information has been provided. Please feel free to reopen this bug if you can provide the information asked for.
Thanks!