GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 473536
SKR04: some definitions from UstVa form are missing
Last modified: 2018-06-29 21:48:06 UTC
Please describe the problem: title says it all. I will work on it, time permitting. Steps to reproduce: Actual results: Expected results: Does this happen every time? Other information:
$ grep Kz. accounts/de_DE/acctchrt_skr04.gnucash-xea |sort <act:description>UstVa Zl. 21, Kz. 41</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 22, Kz. 44</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 24, Kz. 43</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 24, Kz. 43</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 25, Kz. 48</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 27, Kz. 51</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 28, Kz. 86</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 32, Kz. 76</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 35, Kz. 97</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 36, Kz. 93</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 40, Kz. 42</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 41, Kz. 60</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 42, Kz. 45</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 42, Kz. 45</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 42, Kz. 45</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 52, Kz. 65</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 55, Kz. 66</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 56, Kz. 61</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 57, Kz. 62</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 58, Kz. 67</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 59, Kz. 63</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 61, Kz. 59</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 63f, Kz. 69</act:description> Two things become clear from this: a) lines 24 and 42 have more than one entry (this might be intended) b) lines 23, 29, 31, 34, 37, 38, 48, 49, 50 and 60 (?) are missing I hope the summary lines 43, 53, 62, 65 and 67 come out in the report. No need to define them in the account chart.
(In reply to comment #1) > a) lines 24 and 42 have more than one entry (this might be intended) Seems like this is indeed intended.
Created attachment 114139 [details] reference files updated for USt rate of 19%
(In reply to comment #1) The following lines are to be adapted to the latest UStVA-form (as of fiscal year 2008) due to the change of the USt rate to 19%: > <act:description>UstVa Zl. 27, Kz. 51</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 27, Kz. 81</act:description> > <act:description>UstVa Zl. 35, Kz. 97</act:description> <act:description>UstVa Zl. 35, Kz. 89</act:description> The newly introduced reference numbers should be included into the files (attached in "reference files updated fro USt rate 19%"): - txf-de_DE.scm - txf-help-de_DE.scm
I have started http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/De/SKR04#Zuordnung_UStVa for documentation and general discussion (In reply to comment #3) > Created an attachment (id=114139) [edit] > reference files updated for USt rate of 19% Thank you for your work. I applied some changes in http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/17304 http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/17310 but left out the following. Please let me know if that needs to change and why. $ diff txf-de_DE.scm /usr/src/gnucash-rw/src/tax/us/txf-de_DE.scm 42c42,44 < (vector-ref (cdr (assv code categories)) index)) --- > (let ((category (assv code categories))) > (and category > (vector-ref (cdr category) index)))) Christian, I still wonder what is the function of txf-de_DE.scm vs. txf-help-de_DE.scm? Please continue discussions about what changes we need because of the increase in VAT 18 months ago in bug 542648. This bug should be about the reporting infrastructure itself. (In reply to comment #4) > The following lines are to be adapted to the latest UStVA-form (as of fiscal > year 2008) due to the change of the USt rate to 19%: Thanks. I made the two changes by adding two accounts instead of changing the old ones. Thus preserving backwards compatibility. http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/17311
(In reply to comment #5) > Thank you for your work. I applied some changes in :) > http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/17304 ... looks good to me. Some little tiny cosmetic thing: "7 v.h." -> "7 v.H." > http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/17310 (cons 'K89 #(none "89" "Steuerpflichtige innergemeinschaftliche Erwerbe zum Steuersatz von 16 v.H." 2 #f "89")) should be (cons 'K89 #(none "89" "Steuerpflichtige innergemeinschaftliche Erwerbe zum Steuersatz von 19 v.H." 2 #f "89"))
(In reply to comment #6) > > http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/17310 > > (cons 'K89 #(none "89" "Steuerpflichtige innergemeinschaftliche Erwerbe zum > Steuersatz von 16 v.H." 2 #f "89")) > > should be Mööt! Wrong answer. For two reason. 1) as mentioned, please discuss the VAT change in bug 542648 2) I'll tell you reason #2 in said bug to fall afoul of #1 myself ;-)
(In reply to comment #7) > 2) I'll tell you reason #2 in said bug to fall afoul of #1 myself ;-) to not fall afoul
GnuCash bug tracking has moved to a new Bugzilla host. The new URL for this bug is https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473536. Please continue processing the bug there and please update any external references or bookmarks.