After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 471011 - crash in Time and Date: probiert icq zu starten ...
crash in Time and Date: probiert icq zu starten ...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 358383
Product: gnome-system-tools
Classification: Deprecated
Component: time-admin
2.15.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Carlos Garnacho
Carlos Garnacho
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-08-28 07:58 UTC by dirkmeissner72
Modified: 2007-09-06 01:10 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description dirkmeissner72 2007-08-28 07:58:53 UTC
Version: 2.15.5

What were you doing when the application crashed?
probiert icq zu starten
aktualisierungen funktioniern nicht - updates


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 38510592 vsize: 0 resident: 38510592 share: 0 rss: 15671296 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1188287544 rtime: 0 utime: 554 stime: 0 cutime:542 cstime: 0 timeout: 12 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/time-admin'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225476432 (LWP 4779)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1225476432 (LWP 4779))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 g_type_check_instance
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #5 g_signal_handlers_unblock_matched
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
  • #9 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Carlos Garnacho 2007-09-06 01:10:30 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 358383 ***