GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 469925
crash in Tasks: sending an email
Last modified: 2008-03-20 13:36:53 UTC
Version: 2.10 What were you doing when the application crashed? sending an email Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.23-0.115.rc3.git1.fc8.bernie #1 SMP Wed Aug 22 16:59:02 EDT 2007 x86_64 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 70200000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Enabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Clearlooks Memory status: size: 785276928 vsize: 785276928 resident: 98349056 share: 56213504 rss: 98349056 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615 CPU usage: start_time: 1187966427 rtime: 2472 utime: 2124 stime: 348 cutime:1 cstime: 4 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 46912562657856 (LWP 28166)] [New Thread 1094719824 (LWP 1824)] [New Thread 1115965776 (LWP 1802)] [New Thread 1115699536 (LWP 1800)] [New Thread 1084229968 (LWP 28257)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x00002aaaac0e001f in waitpid () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
+ Trace 157608
Thread 1 (Thread 46912562657856 (LWP 28166))
----------- .xsession-errors (54364 sec old) --------------------- Resource id: 0x141026d X Error: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) 8 Major opcode: 158 Minor opcode: 6 Resource id: 0x141026d X Error: BadPixmap (invalid Pixmap parameter) 4 Major opcode: 54 Minor opcode: 0 Resource id: 0x1410314 X Error: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) 8 Major opcode: 158 Minor opcode: 6 Resource id: 0x1410314 ...Too much output, ignoring rest... --------------------------------------------------
*** Bug 471912 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 478203 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 426807 ***