After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 452880 - crash in Archive Manager: login the lumaqq downloa...
crash in Archive Manager: login the lumaqq downloa...
Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
Product: file-roller
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.18.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Paolo Bacchilega
file-roller-maint
: 453662 455775 456991 478878 483148 487758 492364 497637 507405 509980 510288 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-07-01 16:10 UTC by pantaiti
Modified: 2008-11-15 17:10 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description pantaiti 2007-07-01 16:10:12 UTC
Version: 2.18.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
login the lumaqq
download some software


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:35:01 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 40927232 vsize: 40927232 resident: 13582336 share: 9990144 rss: 13582336 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1183306114 rtime: 77 utime: 66 stime: 11 cutime:40 cstime: 10 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/file-roller'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208592672 (LWP 9224)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x003c2402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1208592672 (LWP 9224))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 g_type_check_instance_cast
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #5 ??
  • #6 ??
  • #7 window_update_file_list
  • #8 ??
  • #9 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #13 ??
  • #14 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #15 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #16 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #17 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 ??
  • #19 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__POINTER
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #23 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #24 ??
  • #25 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #26 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #27 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOOLEAN
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #29 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #30 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Karsten Bräckelmann 2007-07-01 17:42:56 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.

Unfortunately, that stack trace is not very useful in determining the cause of
the crash. Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please install
some debugging packages and reproduce the crash, if possible.

Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to
do so and reopen this bug or simply report a new one.  Thanks!
Comment 2 palfrey 2007-07-04 13:05:53 UTC
*** Bug 453662 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Damien Durand 2007-07-11 10:10:13 UTC
*** Bug 455775 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-07-15 19:01:43 UTC
*** Bug 456991 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 pantaiti 2007-07-17 03:46:29 UTC
how can add comment here 
i recieved the letter,but still didn't know what should i do.
Comment 6 André Klapper 2007-10-29 22:40:59 UTC
pantaiti: the question that karsten asked in comment #1 here.
Comment 7 André Klapper 2007-10-29 22:41:04 UTC
*** Bug 487758 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 André Klapper 2007-10-29 22:45:03 UTC
*** Bug 478878 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 André Klapper 2007-10-29 22:45:05 UTC
*** Bug 483148 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Susana 2007-11-24 16:29:07 UTC
*** Bug 497637 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Bruno Boaventura 2008-01-18 23:18:20 UTC
*** Bug 510288 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-03-06 09:42:16 UTC
*** Bug 509980 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-05-04 23:26:43 UTC
*** Bug 507405 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-05-04 23:33:05 UTC
*** Bug 492364 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 André Klapper 2008-11-15 17:10:10 UTC
Closing this bug report as no further information has been provided. Please feel free to reopen this bug if you can provide the information asked for.
Thanks!