Bug 451614 – crash in Tasks:

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 451614 - crash in Tasks:


Summary:	crash in Tasks:


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 431342

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	Tasks
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	evolution-calendar-maintainers
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-06-27 13:34 UTC by pedroka77
Modified:	2007-07-03 03:29 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.17/2.18

Description pedroka77 2007-06-27 13:34:11 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:35:01 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 158191616 vsize: 158191616 resident: 24158208 share: 17248256 rss: 24158208 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1182951200 rtime: 182 utime: 158 stime: 24 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208613152 (LWP 2100)]
[New Thread -1268065392 (LWP 2121)]
[New Thread -1278952560 (LWP 2120)]
[New Thread -1257575536 (LWP 2119)]
[New Thread -1247085680 (LWP 2114)]
[New Thread -1236595824 (LWP 2113)]
[New Thread -1226105968 (LWP 2112)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x005fd402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 144116

Thread 1 (Thread -1208613152 (LWP 2100))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 ??
#4 <signal handler called>
#5 camel_message_info_ptr
from /usr/lib/libcamel-provider-1.2.so.10
#6 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#7 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
#8 e_tree_model_value_at
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
#9 e_table_sorting_utils_tree_sort
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
#10 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
#11 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
#12 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
#13 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__POINTER
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 e_tree_model_node_changed
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
#19 e_tree_memory_thaw
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
#20 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#21 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#22 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#23 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#24 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#25 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#26 gtk_dialog_run
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#27 ??
from /usr/lib/libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
#28 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#29 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#30 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#31 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#32 bonobo_main
from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
#33 main
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Karsten Bräckelmann 2007-07-03 03:29:15 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.

This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.

Please see bug 431342 comment 96.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 431342 ***