Bug 451610 – crash in Tasks: Colocando em ordem por n...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 451610 - crash in Tasks: Colocando em ordem por n...


Summary:	crash in Tasks: Colocando em ordem por n...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 431342

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	Tasks
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	evolution-calendar-maintainers
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-06-27 13:23 UTC by pedro
Modified:	2007-06-27 13:34 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.17/2.18

Description pedro 2007-06-27 13:23:01 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Colocando em ordem por nome.


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:35:01 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 159191040 vsize: 159191040 resident: 24104960 share: 17215488 rss: 24104960 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1182950435 rtime: 173 utime: 156 stime: 17 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208490272 (LWP 3221)]
[New Thread -1289270384 (LWP 3233)]
[New Thread -1278387312 (LWP 3232)]
[New Thread -1246917744 (LWP 3231)]
[New Thread -1267897456 (LWP 3228)]
[New Thread -1236407408 (LWP 3225)]
[New Thread -1225917552 (LWP 3224)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x0064e402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 144112

Thread 1 (Thread -1208490272 (LWP 3221))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 ??
#4 <signal handler called>
#5 camel_message_info_ptr
from /usr/lib/libcamel-provider-1.2.so.10
#6 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#7 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
#8 e_tree_model_value_at
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
#9 e_table_sorting_utils_tree_sort
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
#10 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
#11 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
#12 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
#13 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__POINTER
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 e_tree_model_node_changed
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
#19 e_tree_memory_thaw
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
#20 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#21 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#22 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#23 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#24 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#25 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#26 gtk_dialog_run
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#27 ??
from /usr/lib/libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
#28 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#29 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#30 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#31 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#32 bonobo_main
from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
#33 main
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 palfrey 2007-06-27 13:34:31 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 431342 ***