GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 446274
crash in Email: reading sent folder in a...
Last modified: 2007-06-11 14:53:20 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed? reading sent folder in an owa account Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.2 2007-05-28 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:35:01 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: Permissive Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Clearlooks Memory status: size: 203104256 vsize: 203104256 resident: 62832640 share: 55578624 rss: 62832640 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1181551631 rtime: 95 utime: 75 stime: 20 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208285472 (LWP 4965)] [New Thread -1211065456 (LWP 4986)] [New Thread -1359500400 (LWP 4985)] [New Thread -1300243568 (LWP 4979)] [New Thread -1289753712 (LWP 4976)] [New Thread -1278862448 (LWP 4975)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x00ce4402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 139983
Thread 1 (Thread -1208285472 (LWP 4965))
----------- .xsession-errors (1220 sec old) --------------------- bad image index (desktop-effects:2600): Gtk-WARNING **: Icon cache '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache' is invalid bad image index (desktop-effects:2600): Gtk-WARNING **: Icon cache '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache' is invalid bad image index (desktop-effects:2600): Gtk-WARNING **: Icon cache '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache' is invalid ...Too much output, ignoring rest... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 431342 ***