After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 442742 - crash in Tasks: Re-sorting messages
crash in Tasks: Re-sorting messages
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 431342
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Tasks
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-06-01 00:11 UTC by gsudduth
Modified: 2007-06-10 23:37 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description gsudduth 2007-06-01 00:11:37 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Re-sorting messages



Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:35:01 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Permissive
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: SnowIsh-1.0

Memory status: size: 139718656 vsize: 139718656 resident: 26910720 share: 16175104 rss: 26910720 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1180656597 rtime: 134 utime: 127 stime: 7 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208731936 (LWP 5941)]
[New Thread -1287083120 (LWP 5959)]
[New Thread -1253053552 (LWP 5957)]
[New Thread -1274033264 (LWP 5956)]
[New Thread -1263543408 (LWP 5955)]
[New Thread -1242563696 (LWP 5952)]
[New Thread -1230189680 (LWP 5951)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00121402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1208731936 (LWP 5941))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 ??
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 ??
  • #6 camel_message_info_ptr
    from /usr/lib/libcamel-provider-1.2.so.10
  • #7 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #8 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
  • #9 e_tree_model_value_at
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
  • #10 e_table_sorting_utils_tree_sort
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
  • #11 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
  • #13 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
  • #14 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__POINTER
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #15 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #16 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #17 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 e_tree_model_node_changed
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
  • #20 e_tree_memory_thaw
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libetable.so.0
  • #21 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #22 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #23 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #24 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #25 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #26 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #27 gtk_dialog_run
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #28 ??
    from /usr/lib/libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
  • #29 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #30 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #31 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #32 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #33 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #34 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 palfrey 2007-06-01 12:50:25 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot
to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash.
Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see
http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so.
Thanks in advance!
Comment 2 André Klapper 2007-06-10 23:37:39 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 431342 ***