Bug 396548 – crash in Open Folder:

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 396548 - crash in Open Folder:


Summary:	crash in Open Folder:


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 362302

Product:	nautilus
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nautilus Maintainers
QA Contact:	Nautilus Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-01-14 17:48 UTC by José Augusto Freire
Modified:	2007-01-16 00:25 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description José Augusto Freire 2007-01-14 17:48:32 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Fedora Core release 6 (Zod)
Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 120868864 vsize: 0 resident: 120868864 share: 0 rss: 26882048 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1168796517 rtime: 0 utime: 263 stime: 0 cutime:249 cstime: 0 timeout: 14 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1209046272 (LWP 3149)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00533402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 102116

Thread 1 (Thread -1209046272 (LWP 3149))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 strcmp
from /lib/libc.so.6
#5 nautilus_file_ref
#6 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
#7 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
#8 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 g_signal_override_class_closure
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 gtk_combo_new
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 gtk_combo_box_set_active_iter
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#15 gtk_combo_box_set_active_iter
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#16 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 g_signal_override_class_closure
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 gtk_widget_activate
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 gtk_menu_shell_activate_item
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#23 gtk_menu_shell_append
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#24 gtk_menu_reorder_child
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#25 gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#26 g_value_set_static_boxed
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#27 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#28 g_signal_override_class_closure
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#29 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#30 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#31 gtk_widget_get_default_style
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 gtk_propagate_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#33 gtk_main_do_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#34 gdk_add_client_message_filter
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#35 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#36 g_main_context_check
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#37 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#38 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#39 POA_Nautilus_MetafileMonitor__init
#40 __libc_start_main
from /lib/libc.so.6
#41 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Susana 2007-01-16 00:25:00 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 362302 ***