Bug 362302 – FC6: [strcmp nautilus_file_ref] selinux crash

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 362302 - FC6: [strcmp nautilus_file_ref] selinux crash


Summary:	FC6: [strcmp nautilus_file_ref] selinux crash


Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Product:	nautilus
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	2.16.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	Urgent critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nautilus Maintainers
QA Contact:	Nautilus Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Duplicates:	362976 365147 365692 365897 366034 367112 368432 370166 371005 371725 372648 372989 373889 374327 374783 374862 374987 375301 375302 375310 375528 375791 375927 375955 375966 376167 376189 376378 376397 376630 376734 376768 376852 377057 377203 377493 377635 378111 378697 379304 379367 379684 380255 380545 380954 381252 381466 381923 382024 382123 382297 382974 383141 383142 383347 383358 383775 383982 384079 384392 385277 385406 385526 385730 385837 385917 386072 386083 386416 386469 387037 387156 387246 387440 387766 388075 388089 388125 388552 388900 389100 389829 390073 390526 390813 390944 391891 392346 392355 392356 393142 393798 394102 394381 394483 394753 394758 394864 395493 396170 396548 396866 397034 397100 397353 397528 397709 398108 398215 398280 398281 398412 398425 398644 398890 399058 399296 400201 400463 400486 400685 400934 400949 402486 402578 404210 406073 407817 410677 412085 412447 412520 412705 415491 415707 415819 416506 416827 417232 417302 418532 423206 424435 425074 425487 428228 429090 429831 430837 431918 432453 433567 434022 434363 434488 437554 438496 438527 438571 438594 440421 440439 440594 441585 441880 441970 442247 442480 443978 446464 447020 448887 449108 449325 449678 449789 450095 450995 451849 452574 452731 453200 455555 458673 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-10-15 06:13 UTC by robhealey1
Modified:	2007-12-09 12:03 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Attachments
Nautilus error (501 bytes, application/octet-stream) 2006-11-19 17:59 UTC, jv4nu	Details
Stack trace (50.34 KB, text/plain) 2006-12-13 17:13 UTC, Burhan Ali	Details
trace from nautilus crash (50.08 KB, text/plain) 2007-01-17 19:15 UTC, Jaakko R	Details

Description robhealey1 2006-10-15 06:13:06 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
changing file permissions


Distribution: Fedora Core release 5.92 (FC6 Test3)
Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 131588096 vsize: 0 resident: 131588096 share: 0 rss: 29073408 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1160891692 rtime: 0 utime: 2115 stime: 0 cutime:1920 cstime: 0 timeout: 195 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208617264 (LWP 2267)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00c5b402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 76401

Thread 1 (Thread -1208617264 (LWP 2267))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 strcmp
from /lib/libc.so.6
#5 nautilus_file_ref
#6 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
#7 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
#8 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 g_signal_override_class_closure
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 gtk_combo_new
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 gtk_combo_box_set_active_iter
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#15 gtk_combo_box_set_active_iter
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#16 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 g_signal_override_class_closure
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 gtk_widget_activate
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 gtk_menu_shell_activate_item
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#23 gtk_menu_shell_append
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#24 gtk_menu_reorder_child
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#25 gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#26 g_value_set_static_boxed
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#27 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#28 g_signal_override_class_closure
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#29 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#30 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#31 gtk_widget_get_default_style
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 gtk_propagate_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#33 gtk_main_do_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#34 gdk_add_client_message_filter
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#35 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#36 g_main_context_check
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#37 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#38 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#39 POA_Nautilus_MetafileMonitor__init
#40 __libc_start_main
from /lib/libc.so.6
#41 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Baptiste Mille-Mathias 2006-10-15 07:50:19 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. Unfortunately, that stack trace is not very useful in determining the cause of the crash. Can you get us one with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so.

Comment 2 Elijah Newren 2006-10-17 21:44:05 UTC

*** Bug 362976 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-25 23:39:38 UTC

*** Bug 365147 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Fabio Bonelli 2006-10-27 15:13:20 UTC

*** Bug 365692 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-27 18:58:39 UTC

*** Bug 365897 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-28 01:38:15 UTC

*** Bug 366034 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 André Klapper 2006-10-29 20:16:49 UTC

*** Bug 367112 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 robhealey1 2006-10-30 02:24:09 UTC

Distribution: Fedora Core release 6 (Zod)
Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 139190272 vsize: 0 resident: 139190272 share: 0 rss: 28536832 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1162162144 rtime: 0 utime: 1578 stime: 0 cutime:1359 cstime: 0 timeout: 219 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

Comment 9 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-31 19:29:12 UTC

*** Bug 368432 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 10 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-11-03 19:49:44 UTC

*** Bug 370166 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 11 André Klapper 2006-11-05 13:26:44 UTC

*** Bug 371005 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 12 André Klapper 2006-11-05 13:26:58 UTC

confirming...

Comment 13 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-11-06 21:40:32 UTC

*** Bug 371725 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 14 André Klapper 2006-11-08 20:41:34 UTC

*** Bug 372648 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 15 Christian Kirbach 2006-11-09 16:19:07 UTC

*** Bug 372989 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 16 Christian Kirbach 2006-11-09 16:20:34 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash. Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so. Thanks in advance!

please install the libc and nautilus debugging packages, trigger the crash and post the resulting trace as an attachment to this report.

Comment 17 André Klapper 2006-11-12 03:33:40 UTC

*** Bug 373889 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 18 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-11-12 20:13:43 UTC

*** Bug 374327 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 19 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2006-11-14 04:52:24 UTC

*** Bug 374783 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 20 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2006-11-14 04:59:31 UTC

*** Bug 374862 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 21 Fabio Bonelli 2006-11-14 16:10:40 UTC

*** Bug 374987 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 22 Christian Kirbach 2006-11-14 21:54:31 UTC

*** Bug 375301 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 23 André Klapper 2006-11-15 02:25:53 UTC

*** Bug 375310 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 24 André Klapper 2006-11-15 02:26:15 UTC

*** Bug 375302 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 25 André Klapper 2006-11-16 01:22:37 UTC

*** Bug 375528 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 26 André Klapper 2006-11-16 10:22:32 UTC

*** Bug 375791 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 27 André Klapper 2006-11-17 14:48:58 UTC

*** Bug 376189 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 28 André Klapper 2006-11-17 14:49:04 UTC

*** Bug 376167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 29 André Klapper 2006-11-17 14:49:11 UTC

*** Bug 375966 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 30 André Klapper 2006-11-17 14:49:16 UTC

*** Bug 375955 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 31 André Klapper 2006-11-17 14:49:23 UTC

*** Bug 375927 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 32 André Klapper 2006-11-17 14:51:08 UTC

Thanks everybody for taking the time to report this bug.

That stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot
to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash.
Can anybody please get us a stack trace with debugging symbols?
Please install the libc and nautilus debugging packages, trigger the crash and
post the resulting trace as a comment or an attachment to this report.

See http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so. 

Thanks in advance, your help is appreciated!

Comment 33 André Klapper 2006-11-17 22:37:46 UTC

*** Bug 376378 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 34 André Klapper 2006-11-17 22:37:52 UTC

*** Bug 376397 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 35 André Klapper 2006-11-18 13:17:11 UTC

*** Bug 376630 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 36 André Klapper 2006-11-18 23:22:46 UTC

*** Bug 376768 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 37 André Klapper 2006-11-18 23:22:55 UTC

*** Bug 376734 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 38 gpalmer1979 2006-11-19 11:37:59 UTC

all the crashes i have had so far seem to happen when i am playing around trying to get into my Samba share on my FC4 samba server. I can get in no problem with NO authentication in the gui desktop. I canNOT get in with authentication in the gui. however if i use the terminal i can get in with authentication.all my crashes are while using samba in some way. I have all my musci on there and i kept getting crashing trying to import the music into rythum box as i have done since in FC4 and FC5.

Comment 39 Christian Kirbach 2006-11-19 12:18:29 UTC

*** Bug 376852 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 40 Christian Kirbach 2006-11-19 12:21:53 UTC

In tha last duplicate the reporter was trying to set permissions on a shared  NTFS drive to R/W

changing permissions on a remote folder of non-Unix style seems to be one way to trigger this.

Folks, please, we need your help. Please install debugging symbols as mentioned in coment #16

Comment 41 Christian Kirbach 2006-11-19 17:23:51 UTC

*** Bug 377057 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 42 Christian Kirbach 2006-11-19 17:28:21 UTC

Please, do not open new reports when there is already a report filed - this is futile.
Instead, copy&paste the trace bug-buddy outputs and paste it *as an attachment* to this report.
Thank you for your effort.

If http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces looks like rocket science to you we'd be happy to make it clearer. Just file a bug for the bugzilla.gnome.org product.

Comment 43 jv4nu 2006-11-19 17:59:33 UTC

Created attachment 76851 [details]
Nautilus error

Christian, let me know if I did this correctly.  THanks John

Comment 44 marquart 2006-11-19 18:21:16 UTC

(In reply to comment #39)
> *** Bug 376852 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[I hope I am doing this corectly!]

thanks for all your efforts guys!

I figured I'd try and give what little extra info that I could - I'm a <total>
newbie when it comes to FC6 & Linux in general.

What I was doing was trying to get a secondary HD into service on my 'new'
box... this HD has 4 NTFS partitions/drives on it.  I was logged in as 'root'

I have been able to get all 4 of them to share out to a WinXP Home box.  The
problem I was having is that all 4 seem to be stuck as R-X - no write
capability.  I was trying every which way to get this in effect when I got the
crashes.

The lines in the FSTab configuration file went like this:
/dev/hdd7     /lancelot     vfat    defaults   1 1
/dev/hdd8     /merlin       vfat    defaults   1 1
/dev/hdd5     /longboat     vfat    defaults   1 1
/dev/hdd6     /igraine      vfat    defaults   1 1

In MTab they show up as this:
/dev/hdd7     /lancelot     vfat    rw 0 0
/dev/hdd8     /merlin       vfat    rw 0 0
/dev/hdd5     /longboat     vfat    rw 0 0
/dev/hdd6     /igraine      vfat    rw 0 0

I have even used Terminal to manually try setting permissions.
I've run chmod -R -v o+rwx /merlin and seen the (-v)reports saying that the
permissions are showing as 'rwxrwxrwx'

when I run ls -l immediately thereafter I get the report back that the file
permissions are 'rwxr-xr-x'

Also when I try to write anything to the drives from the XP machine I get a
'Access denied' error.

Im using the Samba server/SWAT which I added with add/remove programs and that
doesn't seem to be able to run 'SWAT'-even though it is supposedly installed-
I'm thinking about pulling down the source files for that and attempting to
compile/install it that way.

Hopefully this info helps.  As I said I'm a newbie so I'm kinda running blind
on this one.

Thanks again!

Comment 45 Christian Kirbach 2006-11-19 21:15:54 UTC

 jv4nu@cox.net : unforunately your attached trace is even worse. you may want to drop by our irc channel #bugs on irc.gnome.org and ask for help obtaining a good trace. alternatively you can mail me or gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org for help.

marquart@arlinn-tower.com : your ntfs problem is unrelated to the crash. quick off-topic info: see http://www.linux-ntfs.org . Microsoft does not publish developer information for NTFS nor a Linux driver. Please stick to the topic, thanks.

Comment 46 marquart 2006-11-19 22:08:09 UTC

My apologies Christian, like I'd said I wasn't sure if it was related since that is what I was doing when she crashed.

Thank you for the link!

I'll go away now and not bother y'all.

Take care & keep up the good work!

Comment 47 André Klapper 2006-11-20 10:19:32 UTC

*** Bug 377203 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 48 André Klapper 2006-11-20 23:28:34 UTC

*** Bug 377493 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 49 André Klapper 2006-11-21 14:05:17 UTC

*** Bug 377635 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 50 Jens Granseuer 2006-11-24 19:20:31 UTC

*** Bug 378697 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 51 Christian Kirbach 2006-11-26 00:12:13 UTC

*** Bug 379304 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 52 Christian Kirbach 2006-11-26 11:41:18 UTC

*** Bug 378111 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 53 Christian Kirbach 2006-11-26 11:41:29 UTC

*** Bug 379367 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 54 André Klapper 2006-11-27 21:22:54 UTC

*** Bug 379684 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 55 Susana 2006-11-28 21:24:09 UTC

*** Bug 380255 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 56 Germán Poo-Caamaño 2006-11-29 17:49:02 UTC

*** Bug 380545 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 57 Germán Poo-Caamaño 2006-11-30 18:15:28 UTC

*** Bug 380954 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 58 Germán Poo-Caamaño 2006-12-01 12:55:37 UTC

*** Bug 381252 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 59 Germán Poo-Caamaño 2006-12-02 01:34:32 UTC

*** Bug 381466 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 60 Susana 2006-12-04 19:02:13 UTC

*** Bug 381923 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 61 Susana 2006-12-04 19:02:39 UTC

*** Bug 382024 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 62 Susana 2006-12-04 19:02:59 UTC

*** Bug 382123 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 63 Susana 2006-12-04 19:03:28 UTC

*** Bug 382297 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 64 Susana 2006-12-06 14:47:47 UTC

*** Bug 382974 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 65 Susana 2006-12-06 20:43:00 UTC

*** Bug 383141 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 66 Susana 2006-12-06 20:43:16 UTC

*** Bug 383142 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 67 Bruno Boaventura 2006-12-07 15:03:27 UTC

*** Bug 383347 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 68 Bruno Boaventura 2006-12-07 15:06:11 UTC

*** Bug 383358 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 69 Bruno Boaventura 2006-12-09 12:31:37 UTC

*** Bug 383775 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 70 Susana 2006-12-09 15:21:29 UTC

*** Bug 383982 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 71 Susana 2006-12-09 20:11:58 UTC

*** Bug 384079 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 72 Damien Durand 2006-12-10 15:23:07 UTC

*** Bug 384392 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 73 Bruno Boaventura 2006-12-13 15:27:01 UTC

*** Bug 385277 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 74 Bruno Boaventura 2006-12-13 15:37:42 UTC

*** Bug 385406 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 75 Burhan Ali 2006-12-13 17:13:06 UTC

Created attachment 78299 [details]
Stack trace

Relevant debugging symbols installed. Stack trace attached.

Comment 76 palfrey 2006-12-13 17:36:53 UTC

*** Bug 385526 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 77 Bruno Boaventura 2006-12-14 15:13:55 UTC

*** Bug 385730 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 78 Bruno Boaventura 2006-12-14 15:41:13 UTC

*** Bug 385837 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 79 Jonathon Jongsma 2006-12-14 19:20:29 UTC

*** Bug 385917 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 80 Christian Kirbach 2006-12-15 01:26:34 UTC

Burhan: your trace has debugging symbols but is missing a frame. Additionally, the trace differs from the one originally reported. It might be the same problem, it might not.

Comment 81 Burhan Ali 2006-12-15 09:24:30 UTC

(In reply to comment #80)
> Burhan: your trace has debugging symbols but is missing a frame.

Christian: I'm not sure exactly what you mean by this. Could you please point to the exact section of the trace you are talking about and how I might provide the extra information (assuming it's possible).

> Additionally,
> the trace differs from the one originally reported. It might be the same
> problem, it might not.

The crash that I experienced (bug 385406) was marked as a duplicate of this one by Bruno Boaventura (comment #74), so I'm not sure whether it is the exact same crash either. Having looked through some of the (many) duplicate bug reports above, it seems that all file permission-related crashes are being marked as a duplicate of this bug. Would it be preferrable if I attached the stack trace to my original bug entry?

Comment 82 Burhan Ali 2006-12-15 09:31:43 UTC

(In reply to comment #81)
> (In reply to comment #80)
> > Burhan: your trace has debugging symbols but is missing a frame.
> 
> Christian: I'm not sure exactly what you mean by this. Could you please point
> to the exact section of the trace you are talking about and how I might provide
> the extra information (assuming it's possible).

Just for clarity, the part I was unsure of was "is missing a frame."

Comment 83 Bruno Boaventura 2006-12-15 15:32:03 UTC

*** Bug 386072 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 84 Bruno Boaventura 2006-12-15 15:35:27 UTC

*** Bug 386083 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 85 Susana 2006-12-16 10:57:14 UTC

*** Bug 386416 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 86 Christian Kirbach 2006-12-16 14:30:51 UTC

Burhan: Missing frames are the lines with a double questino mark ("??") in them.

The most important ones are the ones follwing the <signal handler> line.

debugging symbols is the stuff within the parenthesis "(" and ")"

Comment 87 Susana 2006-12-16 15:10:22 UTC

*** Bug 386469 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 88 Burhan Ali 2006-12-16 16:36:31 UTC

(In reply to comment #86)
> Burhan: Missing frames are the lines with a double questino mark ("??") in
> them.
> 
> The most important ones are the ones follwing the <signal handler> line.
> 
> debugging symbols is the stuff within the parenthesis "(" and ")"

Ah, you're talking about the calls from libpthread and and libc. I was wondering whether their omission would be problematic. I guess the answer is Yes.

Both those libraries belong to the package "glibc-2.5-3". I have the relevant debug packages installed ("glibc-debuginfo-2.5-3" and "glibc-debuginfo-common-2.5-3") but that part of the stack trace remains empty. Is there anything else that I can try, in order to get the missing information?

Comment 89 Susana 2006-12-18 11:15:13 UTC

*** Bug 387037 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 90 Jens Granseuer 2006-12-18 15:46:58 UTC

*** Bug 387156 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 91 Susana 2006-12-18 19:46:51 UTC

*** Bug 387246 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 92 Martin Wehner 2006-12-19 11:57:34 UTC

*** Bug 387440 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 93 Susana 2006-12-20 12:55:51 UTC

*** Bug 387766 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 94 Susana 2006-12-21 15:09:03 UTC

*** Bug 388075 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 95 Susana 2006-12-21 15:09:30 UTC

*** Bug 388089 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 96 Susana 2006-12-21 15:11:22 UTC

*** Bug 388125 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 97 Christian Kirbach 2006-12-25 23:32:09 UTC

*** Bug 388552 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 98 Susana 2006-12-25 23:37:03 UTC

*** Bug 389100 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 99 Martin Wehner 2006-12-27 05:34:46 UTC

*** Bug 389829 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 100 Martin Wehner 2006-12-28 03:42:22 UTC

*** Bug 390073 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 101 Martin Wehner 2006-12-28 03:42:42 UTC

*** Bug 388900 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 102 Susana 2006-12-29 02:31:18 UTC

*** Bug 390526 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 103 Jens Granseuer 2006-12-30 10:27:46 UTC

*** Bug 390813 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 104 Susana 2006-12-30 14:54:22 UTC

*** Bug 390944 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 105 Pascal Terjan 2007-01-02 14:13:01 UTC

*** Bug 391891 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 106 Susana 2007-01-03 18:49:58 UTC

*** Bug 392346 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 107 Susana 2007-01-03 18:52:02 UTC

*** Bug 392355 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 108 Susana 2007-01-03 18:52:34 UTC

*** Bug 392356 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 109 Susana 2007-01-06 05:33:35 UTC

*** Bug 393142 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 110 Jens Granseuer 2007-01-07 20:49:47 UTC

*** Bug 393798 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 111 Pedro de Medeiros 2007-01-08 20:52:35 UTC

*** Bug 394102 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 112 Susana 2007-01-09 22:58:01 UTC

*** Bug 394381 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 113 Susana 2007-01-09 22:59:42 UTC

*** Bug 394483 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 114 Susana 2007-01-09 23:00:05 UTC

*** Bug 394753 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 115 Susana 2007-01-09 23:00:19 UTC

*** Bug 394758 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 116 André Klapper 2007-01-11 22:44:47 UTC

*** Bug 394864 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 117 André Klapper 2007-01-12 01:02:16 UTC

*** Bug 395493 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 118 André Klapper 2007-01-14 03:23:12 UTC

*** Bug 396170 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 119 Susana 2007-01-16 00:24:47 UTC

*** Bug 396866 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 120 Susana 2007-01-16 00:25:00 UTC

*** Bug 396548 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 121 Susana 2007-01-16 00:25:13 UTC

*** Bug 397034 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 122 Susana 2007-01-16 17:36:04 UTC

*** Bug 397100 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 123 André Klapper 2007-01-17 00:27:42 UTC

*** Bug 397353 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 124 Jaakko R 2007-01-17 19:15:44 UTC

Created attachment 80539 [details]
trace from nautilus crash

Coming from bug 397034. I tried to change SELinux context on a file on SMB-share.  But I have SELinux disabled.. This bug triggers easily, if the trace is not good enough, please provide some instructions how to proceed.

Comment 125 Jens Granseuer 2007-01-17 19:56:08 UTC

*** Bug 397709 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 126 André Klapper 2007-01-17 23:34:23 UTC

*** Bug 397528 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 127 Christian Kirbach 2007-01-18 22:39:13 UTC

Susana: please check if the trace in the bug you close has debugging symbols, and copy the trace to the other bug. this is crucial and helpful!

Thank you Jaakko for spotting this, this is REALLY HELPFUL since the trace is pretty good. I can confirm this report now and the developers can start fixing this problem.

+ Trace 103360

#3 <signal handler called>
#4 strcmp
from /lib/libc.so.6
#5 nautilus_file_set_selinux_context
at nautilus-file.c line 3690
#6 selinux_done_editing
at fm-properties-window.c line 1752
#7 selinux_popup_activate
at fm-properties-window.c line 1859
#8 IA__g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
at gmarshal.c line 77
#9 IA__g_closure_invoke
at gclosure.c line 490
#10 signal_emit_unlocked_R
at gsignal.c line 2438

Comment 128 palfrey 2007-01-19 00:12:45 UTC

*** Bug 398108 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 129 palfrey 2007-01-19 15:49:16 UTC

*** Bug 398215 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 130 palfrey 2007-01-19 15:56:04 UTC

*** Bug 398280 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 131 palfrey 2007-01-19 15:56:56 UTC

*** Bug 398281 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 132 palfrey 2007-01-19 17:21:45 UTC

*** Bug 398412 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 133 Jonathon Jongsma 2007-01-19 18:52:51 UTC

*** Bug 398425 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 134 Susana 2007-01-20 16:12:15 UTC

*** Bug 398644 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 135 palfrey 2007-01-21 01:30:42 UTC

*** Bug 398890 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 136 André Klapper 2007-01-22 17:30:01 UTC

*** Bug 399058 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 137 André Klapper 2007-01-22 18:14:48 UTC

*** Bug 399296 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 138 Alexander Larsson 2007-01-23 08:15:05 UTC

nautilus_file_set_selinux_context is in a fc6-specific patch (that we want to bring upstream eventually)

Comment 139 Alexander Larsson 2007-01-23 11:16:32 UTC

I have a fix and will do an fc6 update.

Comment 140 André Klapper 2007-01-23 15:47:00 UTC

yes, now that i have looked at all the dups, this is definitely a FC-only bug.

alex, thanks for fixing, like always :-)

Comment 141 palfrey 2007-01-24 23:41:22 UTC

*** Bug 400201 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 142 André Klapper 2007-01-25 02:44:09 UTC

*** Bug 400463 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 143 Bruno Boaventura 2007-01-25 22:31:48 UTC

*** Bug 400486 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 144 Bruno Boaventura 2007-01-25 23:11:35 UTC

*** Bug 400685 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 145 André Klapper 2007-01-26 19:34:59 UTC

*** Bug 400949 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 146 André Klapper 2007-01-26 19:40:56 UTC

*** Bug 400934 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 147 Susana 2007-01-31 15:01:33 UTC

*** Bug 402486 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 148 Marc-Andre Lureau 2007-02-04 14:53:38 UTC

*** Bug 404210 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 149 André Klapper 2007-02-04 17:30:00 UTC

*** Bug 402578 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 150 Susana 2007-02-09 16:53:10 UTC

*** Bug 406073 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 151 Susana 2007-02-14 14:45:35 UTC

*** Bug 407817 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 152 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-02-22 12:00:13 UTC

*** Bug 410677 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 153 Susana 2007-02-26 17:45:14 UTC

*** Bug 412085 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 154 Pascal Terjan 2007-02-26 23:08:39 UTC

*** Bug 412447 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 155 Susana 2007-02-27 12:46:55 UTC

*** Bug 412520 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 156 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-02-27 17:57:16 UTC

*** Bug 412705 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 157 Christian Kirbach 2007-03-06 22:22:28 UTC

*** Bug 415491 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 158 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-03-07 14:38:45 UTC

*** Bug 415707 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 159 Christian Kirbach 2007-03-07 20:07:08 UTC

*** Bug 415819 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 160 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-03-09 17:55:52 UTC

*** Bug 416506 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 161 Christian Kirbach 2007-03-10 16:18:19 UTC

*** Bug 416827 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 162 Pascal Terjan 2007-03-11 21:25:18 UTC

*** Bug 417232 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 163 André Klapper 2007-03-13 19:51:16 UTC

*** Bug 417302 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 164 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-03-15 13:04:52 UTC

*** Bug 418532 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 165 André Klapper 2007-03-31 13:18:00 UTC

*** Bug 423206 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 166 André Klapper 2007-03-31 14:40:13 UTC

*** Bug 424435 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 167 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-04-02 15:15:28 UTC

*** Bug 425487 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 168 André Klapper 2007-04-03 09:13:42 UTC

*** Bug 425074 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 169 palfrey 2007-04-10 17:46:52 UTC

*** Bug 428228 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 170 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-04-15 03:07:49 UTC

*** Bug 429831 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 171 palfrey 2007-04-16 15:40:28 UTC

*** Bug 429090 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 172 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-04-18 00:04:16 UTC

*** Bug 430837 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 173 palfrey 2007-04-26 15:49:46 UTC

*** Bug 433567 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 174 palfrey 2007-04-27 14:54:14 UTC

*** Bug 431918 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 175 palfrey 2007-04-27 15:01:47 UTC

*** Bug 432453 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 176 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-04-28 03:25:16 UTC

*** Bug 434022 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 177 Jonathon Jongsma 2007-04-29 18:22:56 UTC

*** Bug 434363 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 178 palfrey 2007-04-30 13:57:38 UTC

*** Bug 434488 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 179 palfrey 2007-05-15 13:44:38 UTC

*** Bug 438496 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 180 palfrey 2007-05-15 13:44:49 UTC

*** Bug 438527 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 181 palfrey 2007-05-15 13:46:34 UTC

*** Bug 438571 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 182 palfrey 2007-05-15 13:46:40 UTC

*** Bug 438594 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 183 palfrey 2007-05-22 13:00:57 UTC

*** Bug 440421 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 184 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-05-22 15:25:14 UTC

*** Bug 440439 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 185 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-05-23 01:15:13 UTC

*** Bug 440594 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 186 palfrey 2007-05-27 14:35:42 UTC

*** Bug 441585 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 187 Sven Arvidsson 2007-05-28 20:58:44 UTC

*** Bug 441880 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 188 palfrey 2007-05-30 10:47:48 UTC

*** Bug 442247 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 189 palfrey 2007-05-31 15:56:01 UTC

*** Bug 442480 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 190 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-06-05 00:13:47 UTC

*** Bug 443978 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 191 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-06-05 00:39:40 UTC

*** Bug 441970 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 192 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-06-11 23:54:44 UTC

*** Bug 446464 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 193 André Klapper 2007-06-22 14:33:58 UTC

*** Bug 449789 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 194 André Klapper 2007-06-22 14:34:08 UTC

*** Bug 449678 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 195 André Klapper 2007-06-22 14:34:16 UTC

*** Bug 449325 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 196 André Klapper 2007-06-22 14:34:27 UTC

*** Bug 449108 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 197 André Klapper 2007-06-22 14:34:37 UTC

*** Bug 448887 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 198 André Klapper 2007-06-22 14:34:47 UTC

*** Bug 447020 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 199 André Klapper 2007-06-22 14:35:01 UTC

*** Bug 437554 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 200 André Klapper 2007-06-22 22:35:06 UTC

*** Bug 450095 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 201 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-06-26 00:24:44 UTC

*** Bug 450995 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 202 palfrey 2007-06-28 14:06:42 UTC

*** Bug 451849 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 203 palfrey 2007-06-30 15:40:57 UTC

*** Bug 452574 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 204 Ghislain MARY 2007-07-02 20:26:12 UTC

*** Bug 453200 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 205 Damien Durand 2007-07-11 10:20:51 UTC

*** Bug 455555 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 206 André Klapper 2007-07-18 16:05:22 UTC

*** Bug 452731 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 207 palfrey 2007-07-20 16:49:17 UTC

*** Bug 458673 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 208 André Klapper 2007-07-21 21:30:51 UTC

i've put this on the auto-reject list because we still get 15 dups per month. the rejecter sends an email to the reporter that he should please install fedora updates.

Comment 209 André Klapper 2007-12-09 12:03:46 UTC

no new rejected reports for more than a month now (we reject reports from GNOME <=2.16).
removing from the auto-reject list.
16 rejected reports.