After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 372456 - crash: Clicking to mail while learning spam
crash: Clicking to mail while learning spam
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 361145
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.8.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
Evolution QA team
: 373010 381249 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-11-08 13:39 UTC by Stanislav Brabec
Modified: 2009-05-28 08:30 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description Stanislav Brabec 2006-11-08 13:39:39 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Clicking to mail in another accont ant folder while learning spam


Distribution: openSUSE 10.2 (X86-64) Beta1plus
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-11-01 (SUSE)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 729493504 vsize: 729493504 resident: 123015168 share: 23973888 rss: 146989056 rss_rlim: -1
CPU usage: start_time: 1162901092 rtime: 20981 utime: 18081 stime: 2900 cutime:4065 cstime: 343 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/opt/gnome/bin/evolution-2.8'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 47904634559696 (LWP 26213)]
[New Thread 1149540672 (LWP 1332)]
[New Thread 1141147968 (LWP 26234)]
[New Thread 1140881728 (LWP 26233)]
[New Thread 1132489024 (LWP 26232)]
[New Thread 1115703616 (LWP 26228)]
[New Thread 1124096320 (LWP 26224)]
[New Thread 1107310912 (LWP 26222)]
[New Thread 1098918208 (LWP 26220)]
[New Thread 1090525504 (LWP 26219)]
[New Thread 1082132800 (LWP 26218)]
0x00002b91a8444c5f in __libc_waitpid (pid=19011, stat_loc=0x7fff0e0ee3fc, 
    options=0) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c:41
41	  int result = INLINE_SYSCALL (wait4, 4, pid, stat_loc, options, NULL);

Thread 11 (Thread 1082132800 (LWP 26218))

  • #0 __select_nocancel
    from /lib64/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    at e-msgport.c line 643
  • #2 thread_dispatch
    at e-msgport.c line 1035
  • #3 start_thread
    at pthread_create.c line 296
  • #4 clone
    from /lib64/libc.so.6
  • #5 ??

Thread 10 (Thread 1090525504 (LWP 26219))

  • #0 __select_nocancel
    from /lib64/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    at e-msgport.c line 643
  • #2 thread_dispatch
    at e-msgport.c line 1035
  • #3 start_thread
    at pthread_create.c line 296
  • #4 clone
    from /lib64/libc.so.6
  • #5 ??

Thread 8 (Thread 1107310912 (LWP 26222))

  • #0 __lll_mutex_lock_wait
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 _L_mutex_lock_106
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0

Comment 1 ebbywiselyn 2006-12-08 06:15:38 UTC
*** Bug 381249 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Karsten Bräckelmann 2007-06-20 22:00:49 UTC
*** Bug 373010 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Akhil Laddha 2009-05-28 08:30:20 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 361145 ***