After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 363576 - crash in Evolution: Mail on IMAP server was ...
crash in Evolution: Mail on IMAP server was ...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 364700
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.8.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
Evolution QA team
: 323262 364942 377199 378509 383262 383267 385781 391165 394309 394456 394531 395244 395730 399104 399367 400822 401133 401195 401410 423017 450427 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-10-20 06:30 UTC by russell
Modified: 2007-09-24 17:10 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Description russell 2006-10-20 06:30:23 UTC 
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Mail on IMAP server was busy downloading, and I switched to a new (plain text) mail.


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 136409088 vsize: 0 resident: 136409088 share: 0 rss: 29581312 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1161325732 rtime: 0 utime: 195 stime: 0 cutime:187 cstime: 0 timeout: 8 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.8'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1232669008 (LWP 31585)]
[New Thread -1313817696 (LWP 31602)]
[New Thread -1305424992 (LWP 31601)]
[New Thread -1296802912 (LWP 31598)]
[New Thread -1276519520 (LWP 31597)]
[New Thread -1268126816 (LWP 31595)]
[New Thread -1259340896 (LWP 31594)]
[New Thread -1249764448 (LWP 31592)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 77266

Thread 1 (Thread -1232669008 (LWP 31585))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 segv_redirect
    at main.c line 426
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 IA__g_main_context_check
    at gmain.c line 2523
  • #6 g_main_context_iterate
    at gmain.c line 2674
  • #7 IA__g_main_loop_run
    at gmain.c line 2881
  • #8 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #9 main
    at main.c line 615
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall 






Comment 1


palfrey





          2006-12-29 18:17:00 UTC
        



*** Bug 385781 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 2


palfrey





          2006-12-29 18:19:07 UTC
        



*** Bug 377199 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 3


palfrey





          2006-12-29 18:19:58 UTC
        



*** Bug 378509 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 4


palfrey





          2006-12-29 18:20:53 UTC
        



*** Bug 383262 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 5


palfrey





          2006-12-29 18:21:07 UTC
        



*** Bug 383267 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 6


Kjartan Maraas





          2007-01-16 14:13:44 UTC
        



*** Bug 391165 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 7


Kjartan Maraas





          2007-01-16 14:14:04 UTC
        



*** Bug 394309 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 8


Kjartan Maraas





          2007-01-16 14:22:10 UTC
        



*** Bug 395244 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 9


Christian Kirbach





          2007-01-27 21:54:12 UTC
        



quite some duplicates, good traces, confirming








Comment 10


Christian Kirbach





          2007-01-27 21:54:41 UTC
        



*** Bug 401195 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 11


Christian Kirbach





          2007-01-27 21:55:08 UTC
        



*** Bug 401410 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 12


Christian Kirbach





          2007-01-27 21:55:23 UTC
        



*** Bug 401133 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 13


Christian Kirbach





          2007-01-27 21:58:12 UTC
        



*** Bug 400822 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 14


Christian Kirbach





          2007-01-27 21:58:21 UTC
        



*** Bug 399367 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 15


Christian Kirbach





          2007-01-27 21:58:56 UTC
        



*** Bug 399104 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 16


Christian Kirbach





          2007-01-27 21:59:02 UTC
        



*** Bug 364942 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 17


Christian Kirbach





          2007-01-27 21:59:07 UTC
        



*** Bug 395730 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 18


Christian Kirbach





          2007-01-27 21:59:12 UTC
        



*** Bug 394531 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 19


Christian Kirbach





          2007-01-27 21:59:17 UTC
        



*** Bug 394456 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 20


Akhil Laddha





          2007-03-27 05:42:18 UTC
        



*** Bug 423017 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 21


André Klapper





          2007-04-12 23:50:10 UTC
        



bug 364700 could be a dup






Comment 22


Christian Kirbach





          2007-06-24 10:56:46 UTC
        



*** Bug 450427 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 23


Tobias Mueller





          2007-08-22 18:41:57 UTC
        



*** Bug 323262 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 24


Tobias Mueller





          2007-08-22 19:14:03 UTC
        



Bug 323262 has a nice stacktrace as well :)

(In reply to comment #21)
> bug 364700 could be a dup
> 
why shouldn't it? Looks perfectly the same to me.






Comment 25


Tobias Mueller





          2007-08-24 10:37:11 UTC
        



Note the NULL pointer:





+
Trace
    157571






    

  • 
#5
IA__g_main_context_check

    
                at gmain.c
                  line
                  2523

    

    • 








This seems to be somewhat related to bug 431459.






Comment 26


Tobias Mueller





          2007-09-24 17:10:01 UTC
        



(In reply to comment #24)
> Bug 323262 has a nice stacktrace as well :)
> 
> (In reply to comment #21)
> > bug 364700 could be a dup
> >

Marking as duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 364700 ***