After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 359785 - crash in Evolution: I click on Sent box to c...
crash in Evolution: I click on Sent box to c...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 360237
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.8.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 359801 359828 359936 359991 360502 360886 422540 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-10-05 04:52 UTC by Chaiwat Suttipongsakul
Modified: 2007-03-31 00:00 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Description Chaiwat Suttipongsakul 2006-10-05 04:52:33 UTC 
What were you doing when the application crashed?
I click on Sent box to check my sent mails. Then click on any box, even Search Folders can crash the evolution.


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 103800832 vsize: 0 resident: 103800832 share: 0 rss: 24887296 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1160023772 rtime: 0 utime: 307 stime: 0 cutime:290 cstime: 0 timeout: 17 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.8'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1232451920 (LWP 13900)]
[New Thread -1296577632 (LWP 13913)]
[New Thread -1288184928 (LWP 13912)]
[New Thread -1259340896 (LWP 13911)]
[New Thread -1267733600 (LWP 13905)]
[New Thread -1249264736 (LWP 13902)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 74610







Comment 1


Elijah Newren





          2006-10-05 05:29:16 UTC
        



Thanks for the bug report. Unfortunately, that stack trace is not very useful in determining the cause of the crash. Can you get us one with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so.







Comment 2


Chaiwat Suttipongsakul





          2006-10-05 10:08:03 UTC
        



Do you mean something like this ? (sorry I'm newbie about gdb and bugbuddy)

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.8'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1232783696 (LWP 7690)]
[New Thread -1288590432 (LWP 7702)]
[New Thread -1258001504 (LWP 7701)]
[New Thread -1266525280 (LWP 7695)]
[New Thread -1249571936 (LWP 7692)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()




+
Trace
    74652






Thread 1
          (Thread -1232783696 (LWP 7690))


    

  • 
#0
__kernel_vsyscall

    • 

  • 
#1
__waitpid_nocancel

    
                from
                /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6

    

    • 

  • 
#2
gnome_gtk_module_info_get

    
                from
                /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0

    

    • 

  • 
#3
segv_redirect

    
                at main.c
                  line
                  426

    

    • 

  • 
#4
<signal handler called>

    • 

  • 
#5
__kernel_vsyscall

    • 

  • 
#6
__lll_mutex_unlock_wake

    
                from
                /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0

    

    • 

  • 
#7
_L_mutex_unlock_269

    
                from
                /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0

    

    • 

  • 
#8
??

    
                from
                /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6

    

    • 

  • 
#9
??

    • 

  • 
#10
??

    • 

  • 
#11
??

    • 

  • 
#12
pthread_mutex_unlock

    
                from
                /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6

    

    • 

  • 
#13
pthread_mutex_unlock

    
                from
                /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6

    

    • 

  • 
#14
e_thread_put

    
                from
                /usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so.7

    

    • 

  • 
#15
ml_regen_timeout

    
                at message-list.c
                  line
                  3923

    

    • 

  • 
#16
message_list_thaw

    
                at message-list.c
                  line
                  3305

    

    • 

  • 
#17
emfb_set_folder

    
                at em-folder-browser.c
                  line
                  1899

    

    • 

  • 
#18
emfv_got_folder

    
                at em-folder-view.c
                  line
                  691

    

    • 

  • 
#19
get_folder_got

    
                at mail-ops.c
                  line
                  1230

    

    • 

  • 
#20
mail_msgport_replied

    
                at mail-mt.c
                  line
                  461

    

    • 

  • 
#21
g_io_channel_unix_get_fd

    
                from
                /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0

    

    • 

  • 
#22
g_main_context_dispatch

    
                from
                /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0

    

    • 

  • 
#23
g_main_context_check

    
                from
                /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0

    

    • 

  • 
#24
g_main_loop_run

    
                from
                /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0

    

    • 

  • 
#25
bonobo_main

    
                from
                /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0

    

    • 

  • 
#26
main

    
                at main.c
                  line
                  615

    

    • 

  • 
#0
__kernel_vsyscall

    • 













Comment 3


Elijah Newren





          2006-10-05 10:39:28 UTC
        



Yes, thanks for following up.  :)  An evo maintainer may say they need more debugging symbols (and ask you to install even more debug packages to get them), but I'll reopen for now and let them have a look.






Comment 4


Sergej Kotliar





          2006-10-05 22:03:01 UTC
        



*** Bug 359991 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 5


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-10-06 02:46:41 UTC
        



Mailer.







Comment 6


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-10-09 16:10:55 UTC
        



*** Bug 360886 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 7


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-10-09 16:32:41 UTC
        



*** Bug 359936 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 8


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-10-09 16:34:52 UTC
        



*** Bug 359828 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 9


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-10-10 11:57:23 UTC
        



*** Bug 359801 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 10


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-10-10 11:57:27 UTC
        



*** Bug 360502 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 11


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-10-10 12:10:42 UTC
        



Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 360237 ***






Comment 12


Susana





          2007-03-31 00:00:51 UTC
        



*** Bug 422540 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***