Bug 353503 – crash after theme change [@gtk_style_realize] [@gtk_style_ref]

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 353503 - crash after theme change [@gtk_style_realize] [@gtk_style_ref]


Summary:	crash after theme change [@gtk_style_realize] [@gtk_style_ref]


Status:	RESOLVED NOTGNOME

Product:	epiphany
Classification:	Core
Component:	General
Version:	2.16.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	Urgent critical
Target Milestone:	2.16.x
Assigned To:	Epiphany Maintainers
QA Contact:	Epiphany Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Duplicates:	351852 353398 354673 354928 354940 354982 355026 355331 355421 355461 355561 356326 356490 356558 356580 357651 357875 357924 358967 359385 361018 361022 361201 361496 362146 362731 362741 362748 363060 364043 364146 365860 365898 366016 366232 366461 367832 368344 368783 370510 371859 373997 374119 376492 377146 377611 377994 379344 380209 380614 382162 384196 386046 386234 386663 390660 391487 391689 393056 393321 393561 394639 395033 395254 395264 395407 398279 398597 399687 399800 400604 400821 402692 402892 403480 403484 403727 404190 405395 405502 405891 406013 407047 407807 407849 408418 411108 411570 411908 413062 413077 413331 414525 415474 415995 416073 417153 417546 417588 417723 418172 418248 419930 420450 420789 421235 421617 422050 422167 423068 423073 423457 424294 425026 427103 428991 429032 429146 429357 429540 429975 430135 430267 430312 431924 435710 436112 437054 438160 439541 439777 441753 445355 469059 478472 485907 489239 491412 500980 504044 509878 523659 524233 531772 533655 534237 538522 551140 566478 571545 574606 575560 576209 576258 576297 589061 594207 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-08-30 06:47 UTC by Gianfranco Liporace
Modified:	2009-09-05 12:01 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	2.18.x
GNOME version:	---

Attachments
possible fix (1.23 KB, patch) 2006-09-08 14:54 UTC, Christian Persch	none	Details \| Review

Description Gianfranco Liporace 2006-08-30 06:47:31 UTC

Version: 2.15.91

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Browsing the page http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=243622


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.15.92 2006-08-22 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.15.92

Memory status: size: 206921728 vsize: 0 resident: 206921728 share: 0 rss: 64475136 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1156917510 rtime: 0 utime: 4465 stime: 0 cutime:4227 cstime: 0 timeout: 238 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/epiphany'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1227667792 (LWP 4959)]
[New Thread -1373996128 (LWP 5026)]
[New Thread -1365603424 (LWP 5025)]
[New Thread -1355953248 (LWP 4996)]
[New Thread -1347560544 (LWP 4995)]
[New Thread -1292559456 (LWP 4973)]
[New Thread -1283310688 (LWP 4967)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 71232

Thread 1 (Thread -1227667792 (LWP 4959))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 gtk_moz_embed_get_title
from /usr/lib/firefox/libgtkembedmoz.so
#4 <signal handler called>
#5 gtk_style_realize
at gtkstyle.c line 840
#6 IA__gtk_style_attach
at gtkstyle.c line 753
#7 gtk_widget_set_style_internal
at gtkwidget.c line 5128
#8 reset_rc_styles_recurse
at gtkwidget.c line 5338
#9 ??
from /usr/lib/firefox/components/libwidget_gtk2.so
#10 ??
#11 ??
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Reinout van Schouwen 2006-08-30 06:57:31 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. Unfortunately, that stack trace is not very useful in determining the cause of the crash. Can you get us one with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so.

Comment 2 Jean-François Rameau 2006-08-30 08:24:34 UTC

hmm,

+ Trace 71242

#5 gtk_style_realize
at gtkstyle.c line 840


I'm not sure but a NULL colormap could be the problem. Code in gtk is:

gtk_style_realize ((GtkStyle *style, GdkColormap *colormap):
...
style->colormap = g_object_ref (colormap);
style->depth = gdk_colormap_get_visual (colormap)->depth;
...

Comment 3 Christian Persch 2006-08-30 12:29:54 UTC

Can you get a trace with debug symbols (at least glib, pango, gtk, and firefox -dbg packages installed) ?

Looks similar but not identical to bug 353398...

Comment 4 Gianfranco Liporace 2006-08-30 13:42:21 UTC

Hi,
I've installed the debug packages. But right now I can't reproduce the crash, and epiphany is a little unstable.

Comment 5 Christian Kirbach 2006-09-08 09:20:54 UTC

*** Bug 354928 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Christian Kirbach 2006-09-08 09:21:39 UTC

last duplicate has a good trace

+ Trace 71878

#3 <signal handler called>
#4 gtk_style_realize
at gtkstyle.c line 840
#5 IA__gtk_style_attach
at gtkstyle.c line 753
#6 gtk_widget_set_style_internal
at gtkwidget.c line 5128
#7 reset_rc_styles_recurse
at gtkwidget.c line 5338
#8 JSD_DebuggerOnForUser
from /usr/lib/libxul.so.0d
#9 IA__gtk_container_forall
at gtkcontainer.c line 1261
#10 reset_rc_styles_recurse
at gtkwidget.c line 5341
#11 gtk_bin_forall
at gtkbin.c line 133
#12 IA__gtk_container_forall
at gtkcontainer.c line 1261
#13 reset_rc_styles_recurse
at gtkwidget.c line 5341
#14 gtk_bin_forall
at gtkbin.c line 133
#15 IA__gtk_container_forall
at gtkcontainer.c line 1261
#16 reset_rc_styles_recurse
at gtkwidget.c line 5341
#17 gtk_notebook_forall
at gtknotebook.c line 3788
#18 IA__gtk_container_forall
at gtkcontainer.c line 1261
#19 reset_rc_styles_recurse
at gtkwidget.c line 5341
#20 gtk_paned_forall
at gtkpaned.c line 1066
#21 IA__gtk_container_forall
at gtkcontainer.c line 1261
#22 reset_rc_styles_recurse
at gtkwidget.c line 5341
#23 gtk_box_forall
at gtkbox.c line 670
#24 IA__gtk_container_forall
at gtkcontainer.c line 1261
#25 reset_rc_styles_recurse
at gtkwidget.c line 5341
#26 gtk_bin_forall
at gtkbin.c line 133

Comment 7 Christian Persch 2006-09-08 11:56:54 UTC

*** Bug 354940 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Christian Persch 2006-09-08 12:27:09 UTC

*** Bug 353398 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 9 Christian Persch 2006-09-08 14:54:21 UTC

*** Bug 351852 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 10 Christian Persch 2006-09-08 14:54:37 UTC

Created attachment 72417 [details] [review]
possible fix

Comment 11 Christian Persch 2006-09-08 17:11:15 UTC

*** Bug 354982 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 12 Christian Kirbach 2006-09-08 23:09:08 UTC

*** Bug 355026 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 13 Christian Persch 2006-09-11 12:47:15 UTC

*** Bug 355331 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 14 Christian Persch 2006-09-11 12:47:34 UTC

*** Bug 355421 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 15 Christian Persch 2006-09-11 12:49:03 UTC

Excellent trace from bug 355421 !

+ Trace 72111

#4 <signal handler called>
#5 gtk_style_realize
at gtkstyle.c line 840
#6 IA__gtk_style_attach
at gtkstyle.c line 753
#7 gtk_widget_set_style_internal
at gtkwidget.c line 5128
#8 reset_rc_styles_recurse
at gtkwidget.c line 5338
#9 moz_container_forall
at mozcontainer.c line 401
#10 IA__gtk_container_forall
at gtkcontainer.c line 1261
#11 reset_rc_styles_recurse
at gtkwidget.c line 5341
#12 gtk_fixed_forall
at gtkfixed.c line 453
#13 IA__gtk_container_forall
at gtkcontainer.c line 1261
#14 reset_rc_styles_recurse
at gtkwidget.c line 5341
#15 gtk_bin_forall
at gtkbin.c line 133
#16 IA__gtk_container_forall
at gtkcontainer.c line 1261
#17 reset_rc_styles_recurse
at gtkwidget.c line 5341
#18 IA__gtk_widget_reset_rc_styles
at gtkwidget.c line 5351
#19 gtk_rc_reset_widgets
at gtkrc.c line 1606
#20 reset_styles_idle
at gtkicontheme.c line 602

Comment 16 Andrew Conkling 2006-09-11 15:58:03 UTC

(In reply to comment #15)
> Excellent trace from bug 355421 !

Thanks. ;)  Kinda funny that I wasn't even running Epiphany when I got the crash. :D  Anything I can do to help?

Comment 17 Christian Persch 2006-09-11 18:43:23 UTC

Were there any warnings on console before the crash? (Or in ~/.xsession-errors if you started epiphany from the menus/panel.)

Comment 18 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2006-09-12 02:02:03 UTC

*** Bug 355461 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 19 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-09-12 11:18:22 UTC

*** Bug 355561 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 20 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-09-16 22:23:17 UTC

*** Bug 356326 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 21 Reinout van Schouwen 2006-09-18 07:14:08 UTC

*** Bug 356490 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 22 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-09-18 16:59:05 UTC

*** Bug 356580 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 23 Christian Persch 2006-09-18 17:09:40 UTC

*** Bug 356558 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 24 Christian Persch 2006-09-25 19:50:25 UTC

*** Bug 357651 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 25 Christian Persch 2006-09-26 20:11:15 UTC

*** Bug 357875 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 26 Christian Persch 2006-09-26 20:12:02 UTC

*** Bug 354673 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 27 Andrew Conkling 2006-09-26 21:20:55 UTC

> chpe changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>             Summary|crash in Epiphany Web       |crash after theme change
>                    |Browser: Browsing the page  |[@gtk_style_realize]
>                    |http:/...                   |[@gtk_style_ref]
>             Version|2.15.x                      |unspecified

I'm not sure about anyone else, but I'm pretty sure I hadn't touched my GTK+ theme at all before seeing this bug.  Unless I'm misunderstanding?

Comment 28 Christian Persch 2006-09-26 21:44:28 UTC

+ Trace 73348

#20 reset_styles_idle
at gtkicontheme.c line 602


This indicates an icon theme change. That could be triggered by a theme change, but also by a run of gtk-update-icon-cache (by installing a program or updating with apt-get), or by installing or uninstalling a theme engine, or by a crash of gnome-settings-daemon.

Comment 29 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-09-27 07:06:48 UTC

*** Bug 357924 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 30 Elijah Newren 2006-10-02 15:49:24 UTC

*** Bug 358967 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 31 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-03 20:23:38 UTC

*** Bug 359385 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 32 André Klapper 2006-10-06 11:26:54 UTC

confirming as per duplicates. :-)

Comment 33 Elijah Newren 2006-10-09 22:29:49 UTC

*** Bug 361018 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 34 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-09 22:55:55 UTC

*** Bug 361022 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 35 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-10 17:14:44 UTC

*** Bug 361201 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 36 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-11 17:53:40 UTC

*** Bug 361496 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 37 André Klapper 2006-10-14 13:33:52 UTC

*** Bug 362146 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 38 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-16 23:03:11 UTC

*** Bug 362731 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 39 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-17 00:49:53 UTC

*** Bug 362741 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 40 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-17 01:15:49 UTC

*** Bug 362748 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 41 André Klapper 2006-10-17 23:32:52 UTC

any progress here? this should be fixed in gnome 2.16, this issue bites lots of users... :-/

Comment 42 Elijah Newren 2006-10-18 05:07:21 UTC

*** Bug 363060 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 43 Christian Persch 2006-10-18 18:59:21 UTC

I haven't been able to find the cause (or even reproduce this). The trace from comment 15 is excellent but not enough; I need to know exactly which widget it is that's having its style reset at the moment of the crash. Everyone who gets this bug please try to produce a core file from the crash so we can examine it (don't attach it to the bug though, that would be useless. If you get one, come on irc.gnome.org #epiphany and we'll debug it remotely).

Comment 44 André Klapper 2006-10-19 08:20:29 UTC

...which leads up to the question: how can a "normal", non-techie user get a core file? any FAQ or instructions available?

Comment 45 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-21 22:38:30 UTC

*** Bug 364043 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 46 André Klapper 2006-10-22 11:04:51 UTC

*** Bug 364146 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 47 André Klapper 2006-10-23 13:29:49 UTC

chpe: *ping* - how can a "normal", non-techie user get a core file? any FAQ or instructions available?

Comment 48 Christian Persch 2006-10-25 23:32:14 UTC

Once you have attached gdb to the crashed process according to the standard wiki instructions, type "generate-core-file filename". Or you can run epiphany after enabling core dumps ("ulimit -c unlimited").

Comment 49 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-27 19:03:08 UTC

*** Bug 365898 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 50 André Klapper 2006-10-28 00:21:57 UTC

*** Bug 366016 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 51 Rob Bradford 2006-10-28 16:26:13 UTC

*** Bug 365860 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 52 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-28 20:47:09 UTC

*** Bug 366232 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 53 Rob Bradford 2006-10-29 17:07:31 UTC

*** Bug 366461 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 54 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-30 18:52:05 UTC

*** Bug 367832 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 55 Reinout van Schouwen 2006-10-31 23:12:41 UTC

*** Bug 368344 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 56 André Klapper 2006-11-01 10:38:12 UTC

*** Bug 368783 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 57 Reinout van Schouwen 2006-11-04 16:05:16 UTC

*** Bug 370510 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 58 André Klapper 2006-11-07 01:28:23 UTC

Dear bug reporters,
can anybody please help the developers to fix this issue by attaching gdb to the crashed process according to http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces/Details#line-134 ? After that, just type "generate-core-file filename" (where "filename" is the name of the file to generate) and post that file here?
Thanks a lot in advance, your help is very appreciated!

(20 duplicates in the last 30 days, 40 duplicates total => gnome 2.16.x target.)

Comment 59 Kevin Kubasik 2006-11-07 12:59:51 UTC

*** Bug 371859 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 60 Christian Persch 2006-11-07 21:56:29 UTC

I found https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210151 which I can reproduce in firefox and which gives a trace that seems to indicate to me that it is the same problem.

Filed upstream as https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359870 .

Comment 61 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2006-11-11 19:56:58 UTC

*** Bug 373997 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 62 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2006-11-12 01:33:14 UTC

*** Bug 374119 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 63 André Klapper 2006-11-17 23:04:26 UTC

*** Bug 376492 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 64 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2006-11-20 07:01:19 UTC

*** Bug 377146 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 65 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2006-11-21 02:39:23 UTC

*** Bug 377611 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 66 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2006-11-22 22:15:51 UTC

*** Bug 377994 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 67 Jean-François Rameau 2006-11-26 18:27:03 UTC

*** Bug 379344 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 68 Jean-François Rameau 2006-11-28 20:49:02 UTC

*** Bug 380209 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 69 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2006-11-29 19:27:34 UTC

*** Bug 380614 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 70 André Klapper 2006-12-05 02:04:30 UTC

*** Bug 382162 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 71 Sitsofe Wheeler 2006-12-09 11:50:26 UTC

100% reproducible steps for reproducing a similar backtrace to the ones mentioned in this bug under Ubuntu Edgy have been attached to https://bugs.launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/74576

Comment 72 Andrew Conkling 2006-12-09 17:44:00 UTC

(In reply to comment #71)
> 100% reproducible steps for reproducing a similar backtrace to the ones
> mentioned in this bug under Ubuntu Edgy have been attached to
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/74576

Steps to reproduce:
1. Start firefox.
2. Go to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RenderingProject/aiglx#head-7c28114d7bfca3fd27da422f9bd36de8f8d41703 .
3. Click on the "Minimization" link.
4. After the video has played press the back button at the top of the window.
5. Start gnome-theme-manager .
6. Change the theme from Human to Industrial Tango.

Expected results:
Window decoration and widgets to change shape/colour across all open gtk programs.

Actual results:
Decoration and widgets change in all gtk programs bar firefox. Firefox crashes with a segfault and prints the following in ~/.xsession-errors:
"
** Message: plugin_destroy
totemBasicPlugin dtor [0x8824858]

(Gecko:9018): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_colormap_get_screen: assertion GDK_IS_COLORMAP (cmap)' failed

(Gecko:9018): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed

(Gecko:9018): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_colormap_get_visual: assertion GDK_IS_COLORMAP (colormap)' failed
"

How reproducible is the problem?
It is reproducible 100% of the time.

Version information:
Ubuntu Edgy
firefox 2.0+0dfsg-0ubuntu3
libgtk2.0-0 2.10.6-0ubuntu1

Comment 73 Christian Persch 2006-12-09 18:44:05 UTC

See comment 60, this is filed upstream.

Comment 74 Reinout van Schouwen 2006-12-09 23:24:59 UTC

*** Bug 384196 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 75 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2006-12-11 03:36:52 UTC

Andrew's steps crash epiphany too.

Comment 76 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2006-12-16 06:49:49 UTC

*** Bug 386234 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 77 Reinout van Schouwen 2006-12-17 17:37:12 UTC

*** Bug 386663 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 78 Reinout van Schouwen 2006-12-18 08:17:51 UTC

*** Bug 386046 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 79 Jens Granseuer 2006-12-29 16:41:35 UTC

*** Bug 390660 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 80 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2007-01-01 15:49:59 UTC

*** Bug 391487 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 81 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2007-01-02 07:49:56 UTC

*** Bug 391689 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 82 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2007-01-05 09:14:40 UTC

*** Bug 393056 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 83 Christian Kirbach 2007-01-05 23:54:33 UTC

*** Bug 393321 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 84 Christian Kirbach 2007-01-05 23:54:55 UTC

last duplicate is 2.17.4

Comment 85 Jean-François Rameau 2007-01-06 17:29:48 UTC

*** Bug 393561 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 86 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-01-10 09:05:42 UTC

*** Bug 394639 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 87 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2007-01-10 15:37:54 UTC

*** Bug 395033 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 88 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2007-01-11 02:22:06 UTC

*** Bug 395254 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 89 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-01-11 16:26:12 UTC

*** Bug 395407 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 90 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2007-01-19 06:52:21 UTC

*** Bug 398279 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 91 Christian Persch 2007-01-20 16:25:16 UTC

*** Bug 398597 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 92 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-01-23 08:19:42 UTC

*** Bug 399687 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 93 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-01-23 16:32:37 UTC

*** Bug 399800 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 94 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-01-25 13:53:30 UTC

*** Bug 400604 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 95 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-01-25 23:34:43 UTC

*** Bug 400821 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 96 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-01-31 08:44:05 UTC

*** Bug 402692 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 97 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-02-01 08:58:42 UTC

*** Bug 402892 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 98 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-02-02 11:41:13 UTC

*** Bug 403480 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 99 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-02-02 11:41:45 UTC

*** Bug 403484 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 100 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-02-02 22:44:57 UTC

*** Bug 403727 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 101 Jean-François Rameau 2007-02-04 11:34:52 UTC

*** Bug 404190 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 102 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-02-07 16:27:56 UTC

*** Bug 405395 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 103 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-02-07 21:37:16 UTC

*** Bug 405502 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 104 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-02-09 08:37:39 UTC

*** Bug 405891 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 105 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-02-09 13:30:35 UTC

*** Bug 406013 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 106 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-02-12 13:10:28 UTC

*** Bug 407047 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 107 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-02-14 11:17:52 UTC

*** Bug 407807 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 108 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-02-14 15:53:34 UTC

*** Bug 407849 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 109 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-02-16 08:44:34 UTC

*** Bug 408418 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 110 Christian Persch 2007-02-28 00:01:24 UTC

Just for reference, the widget that has a widget->window with NULL colourmap is a GtkSocket that has been destroyed.

Comment 111 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-02-28 14:38:52 UTC

*** Bug 413062 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 112 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-02-28 14:40:59 UTC

*** Bug 395264 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 113 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-02-28 15:23:36 UTC

*** Bug 413077 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 114 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-03-01 08:37:53 UTC

*** Bug 413331 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 115 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-03-07 00:02:41 UTC

*** Bug 415474 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 116 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-03-07 00:03:21 UTC

*** Bug 411908 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 117 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-03-07 00:03:37 UTC

*** Bug 411108 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 118 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-03-07 00:03:55 UTC

*** Bug 411570 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 119 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-03-08 08:39:38 UTC

*** Bug 415995 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 120 Christian Persch 2007-03-11 00:15:25 UTC

This should at least not occur anymore when using the totem plugin (>= 2.18.0), since totem was fixed in bug 415389. It still might occur with other plugins that use NPPVpluginKeepLibraryInMemory. At least this should be uncommon; google codesearch didn't find anything beside totem-plugin.

I'll close this; the upstream bug is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359870 .

Comment 121 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2007-03-11 18:54:52 UTC

*** Bug 417153 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 122 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-03-12 20:23:11 UTC

*** Bug 417588 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 123 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-03-14 10:59:44 UTC

*** Bug 418172 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 124 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-03-14 16:43:13 UTC

*** Bug 418248 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 125 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-03-18 23:33:24 UTC

*** Bug 419930 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 126 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-03-20 10:57:17 UTC

*** Bug 420450 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 127 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-03-22 11:25:35 UTC

*** Bug 421235 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 128 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-03-22 23:45:27 UTC

*** Bug 421617 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 129 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-03-24 21:30:07 UTC

*** Bug 422050 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 130 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-03-26 23:26:11 UTC

*** Bug 423068 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 131 Yanko Kaneti 2007-03-27 01:24:20 UTC

*** Bug 423073 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 132 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-03-27 20:07:17 UTC

*** Bug 423457 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 133 Yanko Kaneti 2007-03-28 18:05:12 UTC

*** Bug 420789 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 134 Yanko Kaneti 2007-03-28 18:28:46 UTC

*** Bug 417723 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 135 Yanko Kaneti 2007-03-28 18:29:14 UTC

*** Bug 417546 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 136 Yanko Kaneti 2007-03-28 18:32:33 UTC

*** Bug 416073 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 137 Yanko Kaneti 2007-03-28 18:34:43 UTC

*** Bug 414525 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 138 Yanko Kaneti 2007-03-30 05:53:23 UTC

*** Bug 424294 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 139 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-04-01 13:12:58 UTC

*** Bug 425026 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 140 Yanko Kaneti 2007-04-02 08:05:25 UTC

*** Bug 422167 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 141 Yanko Kaneti 2007-04-07 08:13:02 UTC

*** Bug 427103 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 142 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-04-12 13:23:36 UTC

*** Bug 428991 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 143 Yanko Kaneti 2007-04-12 16:40:03 UTC

*** Bug 429032 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 144 Yanko Kaneti 2007-04-13 07:10:25 UTC

*** Bug 429146 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 145 palfrey 2007-04-15 19:49:04 UTC

*** Bug 429975 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 146 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-04-16 07:47:16 UTC

*** Bug 429357 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 147 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-04-16 14:05:22 UTC

*** Bug 429540 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 148 palfrey 2007-04-16 14:05:23 UTC

*** Bug 430267 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 149 palfrey 2007-04-16 14:20:03 UTC

*** Bug 430312 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 150 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-04-16 14:50:35 UTC

*** Bug 430135 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 151 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-04-21 23:06:59 UTC

*** Bug 431924 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 152 palfrey 2007-05-04 11:18:23 UTC

*** Bug 435710 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 153 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-05-05 13:13:32 UTC

*** Bug 436112 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 154 palfrey 2007-05-09 10:56:44 UTC

*** Bug 437054 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 155 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-05-13 19:43:34 UTC

*** Bug 438160 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 156 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-05-18 23:36:35 UTC

*** Bug 439541 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 157 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-05-19 21:47:55 UTC

*** Bug 439777 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 158 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-05-28 11:42:14 UTC

*** Bug 441753 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 159 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-06-08 19:48:33 UTC

*** Bug 445355 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 160 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-08-22 08:50:53 UTC

*** Bug 469059 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 161 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-09-20 09:53:56 UTC

*** Bug 478472 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 162 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-10-12 07:45:48 UTC

*** Bug 485907 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 163 Cosimo Cecchi 2007-10-23 09:27:15 UTC

*** Bug 489239 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 164 Cosimo Cecchi 2007-10-29 20:26:10 UTC

*** Bug 491412 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 165 André Klapper 2007-11-30 00:55:03 UTC

removed from auto-reject list

Comment 166 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2007-12-02 07:39:49 UTC

*** Bug 500980 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 167 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-12-17 15:28:56 UTC

*** Bug 504044 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 168 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-12-18 08:43:36 UTC

Andre, why did you remove this from the auto-reject list?

Comment 169 André Klapper 2007-12-18 11:38:27 UTC

reinout, because there hadn't been any rejected reports for weeks, and because we want to keep the number of auto-reject bugs manageable.

Comment 170 André Klapper 2007-12-18 12:14:44 UTC

sorry for not posting figures when i removed it:
2007-07-10: 2 rejected bugs.
2007-11-18: still 2 rejected bugs.
no reason to keep this one.

Comment 171 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-01-16 12:49:27 UTC

*** Bug 509878 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 172 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-03-21 09:47:06 UTC

*** Bug 523659 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 173 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-03-25 23:00:30 UTC

*** Bug 524233 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 174 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-05-06 16:06:38 UTC

*** Bug 531772 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 175 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-05-18 20:53:12 UTC

*** Bug 533655 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 176 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2008-05-21 19:28:34 UTC

*** Bug 534237 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 177 Sam Morris 2008-05-21 20:01:39 UTC

The mozilla bug says this is fixed in Firefox 3, but I just ran into it using xulrunner 1.9 beta 5.

Comment 178 André Klapper 2008-05-25 16:51:23 UTC

Sam Morris: please reopen the mozilla bug then.

Comment 179 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-06-16 09:58:56 UTC

*** Bug 538522 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 180 Sam Morris 2008-06-16 19:26:32 UTC

There doesn't appear to be any way for mere mortals to reopen Mozilla bugs.

Comment 181 Sam Morris 2008-06-18 10:44:47 UTC

Upstream says this is a GTK+ bug, can someone please re-open and reassign it.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359870#c24

Comment 182 André Klapper 2008-08-12 12:31:12 UTC

The bug just does not happen anymore. No new duplicates for ages now.
If you can still reproduce it, please provide a stacktrace and the exact versions of gtk+ and mozilla/xulrunner/forefox/whatever you are using.

Comment 183 Sam Morris 2008-08-12 13:12:09 UTC

It still happens to me, details on Mozilla's bugzilla. Hopefully someone there will work out WTF is going on.

Comment 184 André Klapper 2008-08-13 22:42:36 UTC

Ah come on, posting them here too isn't that hard... ;-)

"And I ran into this again with GTK+ 2.12.11. Oh, and xulrunner 1.9.0.1 this time.
backtrace with gtk 2.12.11 and xulrunner 1.9.0.1:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=333248 "


Sam, do you use totem and is it used for displaying media content in firefox? which totem backend (xine, gstreamer)? which distro at all?

Comment 185 Sam Morris 2008-08-13 22:53:23 UTC

Totem eh... I'm using the Mozilla plug-in from version 2.22.2.
GStreamer backend, on a Debian testing/unstable system.

Comment 186 André Klapper 2008-08-14 09:16:27 UTC

what is "the Mozilla plug-in"? Something that totem ships?
Which GStreamer version is installed, which totem version is installed?

Comment 187 Sam Morris 2008-08-14 09:40:57 UTC

It's a netscape browser plugin that totem ships: http://packages.debian.org/totem-mozilla from totem 2.22.2.

Installed, I have:

gstreamer 0.10.20
gst-plugins-good 0.10.8
gst-plugins-bad 0.10.7
gst-plugins-ugly 0.10.8
gst-plugins-base 0.10.19

Comment 188 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-09-06 21:18:56 UTC

*** Bug 551140 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 189 Reinout van Schouwen 2009-01-04 16:10:21 UTC

*** Bug 566478 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 190 palfrey 2009-02-13 11:55:51 UTC

*** Bug 571545 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 191 Reinout van Schouwen 2009-03-09 09:03:20 UTC

*** Bug 574606 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 192 Reinout van Schouwen 2009-03-16 15:30:12 UTC

*** Bug 575560 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 193 Fabio Durán Verdugo 2009-03-21 17:33:09 UTC

*** Bug 576209 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 194 Fabio Durán Verdugo 2009-03-22 18:27:14 UTC

*** Bug 576297 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 195 Christian Persch 2009-03-25 15:01:56 UTC

*** Bug 576258 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 196 Javier Jardón (IRC: jjardon) 2009-07-19 22:24:37 UTC

*** Bug 589061 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 197 Reinout van Schouwen 2009-09-05 12:01:36 UTC

*** Bug 594207 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***