After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 349078 - Hovd, Ulaanbaatar, Choibalsan is daylight saving
Hovd, Ulaanbaatar, Choibalsan is daylight saving
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evolution-data-server
Classification: Platform
Component: Calendar
1.8.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 348257 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-07-28 11:59 UTC by DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar
Modified: 2013-09-14 16:49 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Attachments
fixes daylight saving in Choibalsan timezone (614 bytes, patch)
2006-07-28 12:03 UTC, DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar
committed Details | Review
fixes daylight saving in Hovd.ics (592 bytes, patch)
2006-07-28 12:04 UTC, DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar
committed Details | Review
fixes daylight saving in Ulaanbaatar.ics (616 bytes, patch)
2006-07-28 12:04 UTC, DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar
committed Details | Review

Description DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar 2006-07-28 11:59:51 UTC
Please describe the problem:
Asia/Hovd, Asia/Ulaanbaatar, Asia/Choibalsan are in daylight saving timezone, but not in evolution-data-server, so people in these zones cannot check Adjust daylight saving timezone.

Steps to reproduce:
Apply patches to Hovd.ics, Ulaanbaatar.ics, Choibalsan.ics


Actual results:
You can use correct time when daylight saving

Expected results:


Does this happen every time?


Other information:
Comment 1 DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar 2006-07-28 12:03:02 UTC
Created attachment 69819 [details] [review]
fixes daylight saving in Choibalsan timezone
Comment 2 DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar 2006-07-28 12:04:05 UTC
Created attachment 69820 [details] [review]
fixes daylight saving in Hovd.ics
Comment 3 DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar 2006-07-28 12:04:40 UTC
Created attachment 69821 [details] [review]
fixes daylight saving in Ulaanbaatar.ics
Comment 4 André Klapper 2006-07-29 10:18:27 UTC
mongolia did not use DST in 1999 and 2000, i guess that's the reason for these wrong ics files. the patch corrects the missing time zone information, but then appointments in 1999 and 2000 would be wrong by one hour. :-/
Comment 5 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-07-29 23:34:05 UTC
*** Bug 348257 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-07-29 23:35:27 UTC
Note:  Please see bug 348257 for some discussion about this issue.
Comment 7 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-08-04 16:47:22 UTC
libical lives in e-d-s, moving over.

Can we please get approval for these patches?
Comment 8 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-08-04 16:48:23 UTC
Oops, forgot to inherit the Target Milestone. 1.7.  Go go go! :)
Comment 9 André Klapper 2006-08-06 12:40:25 UTC
chen: *poke*

libical neither lives in e-d-s nor evo. i moved it to evo as there is a libical component. we should probably move the libical component to e-d-s because libical gets copied there, yeah.
Comment 10 Chenthill P 2006-08-07 16:53:11 UTC
Please commit the patch to cvs HEAD and gnome-2-14 branch.
Comment 11 Chenthill P 2006-08-07 17:02:25 UTC
Committed the patch to gnome-2-14 and HEAD branches on behalf of dulmandakh.
Comment 12 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-08-07 20:18:55 UTC
Thanks, chen.


(In reply to comment #9)
> libical neither lives in e-d-s nor evo. i moved it to evo as there is a libical
> component. we should probably move the libical component to e-d-s because
> libical gets copied there, yeah.

Well, what I was about WRT "living" simply is, where libical is located inside the Evo stack. Which is e-d-s, hence the product change.

Regarding libical living elsewhere and being an independant project...  Well, since I figured this should go upstream, I had a look. Sadyl, it seems the latest libical release is years ago and actually what libical in Evo is based upon. There has been no upstream libical release ever since. Thus it is debateable, if it actually is living at all... ;)


Anyway, I agree, the libical component should move from product evolution to e-d-s.
Comment 13 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-08-07 20:36:22 UTC
Setting attachment status appropriately.

chen, *please* do care about this.
Comment 14 Harish Krishnaswamy 2006-08-08 03:57:40 UTC
> Anyway, I agree, the libical component should move from product evolution to
> e-d-s.
> 

Done. The component libical now lives in EDS.
Comment 15 André Klapper 2006-08-12 11:32:31 UTC
(in reference to comment #13:)
nitpicking, anyway:
guenther, chen *did* care about setting the attachment status appropriately. it was you who reset it. :-)
fyi, i sometimes have the same problem with firefox not correctly reloading dropdown option menus.
Comment 16 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-08-27 16:13:01 UTC
Doh! I was sure that I forced a fresh reload (Shift Reload), as I always do in such cases. Anyway, I sure may have missed it here...

Chen, sorry, I stand corrected with egg on my face. ;)