After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 338680 - Fast user switching-applet not switching users in an expected manner.
Fast user switching-applet not switching users in an expected manner.
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 172912
Product: fast-user-switch-applet
Classification: Deprecated
Component: Applet
2.14.x
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: Fast User Switch Applet Maintainer
Fast User Switch Applet Maintainer
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-04-16 11:17 UTC by Janne Ojaniemi
Modified: 2006-04-17 12:32 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.13/2.14



Description Janne Ojaniemi 2006-04-16 11:17:39 UTC
When I click on the fast user switching-applet, I get a list of users on that
computer. The expected behavior of the applet is that when I click on a user, it
prompts me for that users password, and after I have succesfully entered the
password, I'm taken to that users desktop.

Currently that does not happen. When I click on an user on the list, I'm taken
to GDM, where I have to AGAIN tell the system which user I want to log in as.
After I have entered the username and the password, I'm taken to that users desktop.

As things are right now, there's no real point in displaying a list of users on
the applet. I could click on user A on that list, and when I'm presented with
GDM, I could log in as user B instead. The optimal solution would be that the
system simply asks for the selected users password, without going through the GDM.

Only time when the applet works as expected is when the users are already logged
in to the machine.

Other information:
Comment 1 James Cape 2006-04-16 19:49:10 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.
Comment 2 James Cape 2006-04-16 19:50:26 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 172912 ***
Comment 3 Janne Ojaniemi 2006-04-17 12:32:50 UTC
I tried looking for duplicates before I posted the bug-report. I'll keep my eye on the original bug-report instead :)