GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 328982
download speed limiting
Last modified: 2015-10-29 12:38:36 UTC
I'd like to have the possibility of limiting my download speed. Sometimes I'm downloading huge files which take a long time to download. The download will also consume all my downstream bandwith. I'm behind a router with two other PC's, if my brother wants to play a game online while I'm downloading with full speed for an hour or so, that's impossible for him because I'm using all the bandwith then. This is quite a serious problem for me and other people sharing internet connections. Maybe for other people as well, it could be useful to limit download speed so that you can still browse the web while downloading. Maybe you could put such a seek bar, like the one in Totem, in the download manager window as an easy way to control the percentage of download bandwith which is used. I've searched Bugzilla for this issue, and I've found this: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117939 That feature request is one and a half year old however, so I wonder if it still isn't possible? I posted about this in the mailing list as well: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2006-January/msg00108.html I haven't received a response from the developers on that mail however, so that's why I'm posting a feature request as well.
Depends on mozilla bugs https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101711 and https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93055 -> Future.
We're no longer blocking on Mozilla. Is Epiphany/WebKit capable of limiting download speeds?
I am not sure I like the idea of doing this in Epiphany. I would rather see this kind of advanced feature in a download manager. Having said that, it should be possible to implement making judicious usage of libsoup's pause/unpause functionality, or we could consider implementing a more sane API and do it in SoupSocket directly.
This is 100% extension material.
(In reply to Gustavo Noronha (kov) from comment #3) > I am not sure I like the idea of doing this in Epiphany. I would rather see > this kind of advanced feature in a download manager. (In reply to Xan Lopez from comment #4) > This is 100% extension material. Yeah, I don't this this will be implemented....