GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 314261
Description of file permission emblems are incorrect and have outdated images...
Last modified: 2005-12-29 19:08:51 UTC
Documentation bug Section: 7.4 Hi, in the image that I have attached to this bug you can see section 7.4 of online help manual where it describes de emblems for file permission. It has the following issues: - Images of emblems are outdated, it should have the default ones that gnome currently ships and afaics is a lock over orange background, cross over a red background and the symlink over blue background. - The description are incorrect. Correct version: For the orange lock should say: "Cannot write to it". For the red cross should say: "Cannot read it". Because, for example, the following file: --wx-wx-wx 1 nelson users 5 Aug 23 10:40 hola.txt just shows the red cross in nautilus, while attending to existing documentation it should'nt because it has write access. Other information: I would prepare a patch but I can't find the culprit doc in the nautilus cvs.
Created attachment 51187 [details] Screenshot of the incorrect doc
Created attachment 51758 [details] [review] Patch to the documentation file The location of the file in cvs to patch is: http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-user-docs/gnome2-user-guide/C/gosnautilus.xml?rev=1.15&view=log
Created attachment 51759 [details] Current nautilus default emblem for symbolic links Location of this file in CVS is: http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-user-docs/gnome2-user-guide/C/figures/naut_link_emblem.png?rev=1.1&view=log
Created attachment 51760 [details] Nautilus default emblem for no write permission Location of file in CVS: http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-user-docs/gnome2-user-guide/C/figures/naut_nowrite_emblem.png?rev=1.1&view=log
Created attachment 51761 [details] Nautilus default emblem for no read permission Location in CVS: http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-user-docs/gnome2-user-guide/C/figures/naut_noread_emblem.png?rev=1.1&view=log
Thanks for your bug report! John: Can you still change this for the Nautilus 2.12 docs or would that be no good for the doc translations?
This patch really is against gnome-user-docs. I'm not sure who owns that though, but i'll reassing it to that module.
marking as a duplicate of a newer bug with documentation fixes for this. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 324966 ***