After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 306840 - Printing thin lines regardless of line thickness
Printing thin lines regardless of line thickness
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 172192
Product: dia
Classification: Other
Component: win32
0.94
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Steffen Macke
Dia maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-06-08 05:08 UTC by catfish
Modified: 2005-06-10 00:26 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description catfish 2005-06-08 05:08:03 UTC
Please describe the problem:
Using the latest version of dia for win32 (0.94) listed at
http://dia-installer.sourceforge.net does not print correctly. All the items are
printed but the lines are very thin regardless of the line thickness set. Tested
on two systems: at work XPsp2 with lexmark laser printer and at home XPsp2 also
with hp inkjet. 0.94-pre1 also listed on that webpage works fine along with 0.92.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create new diagram
2. Draw a few lines and circles...etc
3. Change created items with different thicknesses.
4. Print


Actual results:
All items are printed but are very thin regardless of line thickness

Expected results:
Items are printed with the correct thickness like 0.94-pre1 and previous.

Does this happen every time?
Yes, on two different systems both xp sp2

Other information:
Using the WIMP theme. Using WIMP with 0.94-pre1 works fine.
I also have latest gimp-win (and it's seperate gtk installer) installed if that
matters.

When printing it opens a console window saying:
Paper size 1, length 2794 width 2159 scale 100
Comment 1 Lars Clausen 2005-06-09 17:48:42 UTC
Thank you for reporting this bug.  Unfortunately, I beat you to it by a couple
months.  Fortunately, Hans beat me to that with a fix for it.  So it's good in
current CVS.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 172192 ***
Comment 2 catfish 2005-06-10 00:26:43 UTC
Thanks, I thought it was a bit odd that no one reported it in the last 10 months
it's been out. Didn't realize the basic search didn't do resolved reports also.
Any precompiled win32 versions kicking around? Thanks