After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 273722 - Unable to access calendar, contacts and tasks
Unable to access calendar, contacts and tasks
Status: VERIFIED INCOMPLETE
Product: Evolution Exchange
Classification: Deprecated
Component: Connector
2.1
Other All
: Normal normal
: 2.2.x
Assigned To: Connector Maintainer
Ximian Connector QA
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-03-15 18:53 UTC by Tommi Komulainen
Modified: 2009-08-15 18:40 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Tommi Komulainen 2005-03-15 18:53:22 UTC
After struggling with bug 273627 for a while I managed to access my mailbox
with evo 2.2.  However, every time I try to access calendar or tasks I get
the error message 'The calendar(task list) is not marked for offline usage'
-- marking on unmarking it for offline use makes no difference.

With contacts the eror message is 'We were unable to open this addressbook.
 This either means you have entered an incorrect URI, or the server is
unreachable.' instead.
Comment 1 Sarfraaz Ahmed 2005-03-15 19:51:10 UTC
Well, this message is really awful. But, you should actually
authenticate in either mailer or exchange view as of now and then be
able to view your calendar and contact folders.
Comment 2 Tommi Komulainen 2005-03-15 19:56:07 UTC
I am able to read my mail so authentication is working.  I just can't
access other data :-/

The exact same configuration works in 2.0...
Comment 3 Sushma Rai 2005-03-16 10:46:19 UTC
Can you set E2K_DEBUG=4 and attach the traces when you try to access
your contacts folder ?

(see http://gnome.org/projects/evolution/bugs.shtml)
Comment 4 Tommi Komulainen 2005-03-16 17:33:26 UTC
After recreating the account from edit/prefs rather than with x-c-s
I'm not getting the errors anymore.  So it seems to be a problem with
x-c-s?
Comment 5 Sushma Rai 2005-03-17 06:17:22 UTC
*** bug 273627 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Sushma Rai 2005-03-21 11:35:22 UTC
Since 73627 is fixed, closing this also.