After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 245342 - "new" toolbar button does not follow gnome settings
"new" toolbar button does not follow gnome settings
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 262210
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.8.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal normal
: Future
Assigned To: Srinivasa Ragavan
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-06-24 10:49 UTC by Michael Meeks
Modified: 2013-09-13 00:50 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Michael Meeks 2003-06-24 10:49:20 UTC 
Now we're all in-process this should be trivial, and improves the look a
lot with a bitmap theme / bg:

On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 06:39, Michael Meeks wrote:
>       Just testing some theme endian oddness for Largo, and I notice the Grey
> background on the 'New' button. Assuming that that's implemented in the
> shell, and you can depend on Gnome 2.2 - then you can use:
> bonobo_ui_component_set_widget () - which will use a Control wrapper out
> of process, but the normal widget (possibly contained in a
> BonoboUIToolbarItem if it isn't one) in-place in the toolbar - which
> fixes theme b/g issues.

Hmm we cannot depend on 2.2 although I guess we could make it
conditional.

Do we have a bug # for this?

-- Ettore: now we do ;-)
Comment 1 Rodney Dawes 2005-03-08 20:41:00 UTC 
Moving this to the 2.3 target. The widget vs. control issue seems to
cause some oddness with the drawing and menu popup code in the
EComboButton code. Also moving this to Miscellaneous, adding the UI
keyword, and upping the priority to Normal. There are probably a few
dups related to this. I'll go through all of that later, though,
they're all assigned to me in some way anyway. :)
Comment 2 André Klapper 2006-01-26 00:42:39 UTC 
yay, i always wondered if bug 327330, bug 307776, bug 262210, bug 254503, bug 252814 and bug 245342 are the same... :-)
too many possible dups, so assigning this to srag. have fun. ;-)
Comment 3 André Klapper 2006-06-18 11:38:18 UTC 
see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=57526&action=view; retargetting to future.
Comment 4 André Klapper 2006-06-18 11:40:13 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 262210 ***