After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 215108 - Improper rendering of HTML email with foreign style sheet
Improper rendering of HTML email with foreign style sheet
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 247564
Product: GtkHtml
Classification: Other
Component: Rendering
unspecified
Other All
: Normal normal
: Future
Assigned To: gtkhtml-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 215321 215326 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-11-11 22:37 UTC by rainman
Modified: 2005-09-27 21:24 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
A screenshot of the bug (74.41 KB, image/png)
2001-11-13 02:54 UTC, rainman
Details

Description rainman 2001-11-11 22:37:14 UTC
When receiving an email that is declared text/html and references an
external style sheet with the <LINK> tag, the renderer does not properly
incorporate the style sheet.

The only reason I noticed this is because there's a blatant error that
occurs in a formed email that a web service regularly sends me. The style
sheet declares a style for the TH tag with color: #ffffff, yet in the email
information enclosed in TH tags are rendered in black text.

I'll try to attach a screen shot. Here's the example email:


To: rainman@owlnet.rice.edu
From: dirtech@sa.rice.edu
Subject: New Post on Space and Facilities: Rice shuttles
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 22:26:33 GMT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Length: 1938


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<BASE HREF="http://sa.rice.edu/">
<LINK REL="StyleSheet" TYPE="text/css" HREF="http://sa.rice.edu/master.css">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">
<TABLE BORDER="0" CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0" >
<TR><TD BGCOLOR="#000000">
<TABLE BORDER="0" CELLSPACING="4" CELLPADDING="4" WIDTH="100%">
<TR>
<!-- Here's the offending TH tag -->
<TH BGCOLOR="#000000">Rice shuttles<BR>posted November 11, 2001 by <A
HREF="home/other-user.tcl?userid=2">Joshua Adam Ginsberg</A>
</TH>
<!-- </OFFENSE> -->
</TR>
<TR><TD BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">
<TABLE WIDTH="100%" CELLSPACING="5">

<TR>
<TD BGCOLOR="#EEEEEE"><BLOCKQUOTE>Hey y'all - <BR>
<BR>
This was brought up for a little bit in the SA meeting last week by the
Space and Facilities committee chairs. They had a very informative meeting
with the director of Rice Transportation the previous week. According to
what they presented in the meeting, the problem that you're experiencing
with the "clumping" of the shuttles occurs because there are three routes.
When the graduate house shuttle and the Greenbriar building shuttle return
to the inner loop route from their deviations, they rejoin the rotation not
evenly spaced from the inner loop route shuttles. Because of the
irregularity of these two routes that leave the inner loop route, they
cannot time them in such a way that the shuttles will all remain evenly
spaced. <BR>
<BR>
Hope this helps a little. I'll ask the Space and Facilities chairs to sign
on to this board and put an answer in their own words too. <BR>
<BR>
-jag</BLOCKQUOTE>
</TD></TR>

        </TABLE></TD></TR></TABLE></TD></TR></TABLE>
<P>You are receiving this from the Q&A Boards division on sa.rice.edu - The
Rice University Student Association. If you would like to control your
preferences on when you receive notifications from our system, please alter
your preferences in <A HREF="home/">your workspace</A>. Thank you for using
our system!</P>
</BODY></HTML>
Comment 1 Jeffrey Stedfast 2001-11-11 23:45:23 UTC
we don't support style sheets at all.
Comment 2 rainman 2001-11-13 02:54:45 UTC
Created attachment 40629 [details]
A screenshot of the bug
Comment 3 rainman 2001-11-13 02:55:44 UTC
Umm... how come? They're pretty standard...
Comment 4 Radek Doulik 2002-08-02 22:00:35 UTC
*** bug 215321 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Radek Doulik 2002-08-02 22:01:21 UTC
*** bug 215326 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Christian Kirbach 2005-08-22 12:26:24 UTC
is this still valid??
Comment 7 André Klapper 2005-09-27 21:24:53 UTC
yeah, but a dup. :-)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 247564 ***