After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 213933 - GPG signed mail appears as attachment to Outlook Express 6
GPG signed mail appears as attachment to Outlook Express 6
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 217541
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
pre-1.5 (obsolete)
Other other
: Normal normal
: Future
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-10-29 19:29 UTC by Edd Dumbill
Modified: 2002-05-03 05:35 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Edd Dumbill 2001-10-29 19:29:12 UTC
Several Outlook Express 6 users have complained the the mail I send them
from Evolution, when signed with GPG, appears as an empty message with two
attachments.  I've verified this locally.  Is this a bug or a feature? 
Surely, the text/plain bit of the message ought to be displayed?  Does
Evolution need to "hint" this more?

I'm pretty ignorant about the ins and outs of this, but thought it ought to
be noted.
Comment 1 Jeffrey Stedfast 2001-10-29 19:35:27 UTC
we send it the way the rfc says to send it, if outlook can't handle it
- that's outlooks problem
Comment 2 Edd Dumbill 2002-02-05 00:37:53 UTC
This doesn't seem like a good answer.  There's plenty of precedent for
bugwards compatibility, however sad it seems to say.

Many people I have to work with use Outlook Express.  This bug just
about makes it impossible for me to sign my email, too.
Comment 3 Chris Campbell 2002-05-03 04:11:58 UTC
I've found this to be a major annoyance, too.  GPG/PGP is effectively
useless to me if I can't use it to communicate with Outlook users!

Is there any way to put pressure on Microsoft to fix this in Outlook?
 I have doubts... so it will probably come down to Ximian either
biting the bullet and hacking a fix into Evolution or else forsaking
encrypted communications with the vast majority of the internet!
Comment 4 Chris Campbell 2002-05-03 04:30:49 UTC
Maintainer:  This looks like a duplicate of bug 204091.  Would you agree?
Comment 5 Jeffrey Stedfast 2002-05-03 05:35:09 UTC
yes, but I'm marking it as a duplicate of bug#217541 because that's
the bug I opened ages ago to track complaints about us not sending
inline pgp.

so bug#204091 is also a dup of bug#217541

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 217541 ***