After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 170660 - crash sometimes (and gaim disconnected of jabber when that happens)
crash sometimes (and gaim disconnected of jabber when that happens)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-panel
Classification: Other
Component: panel
2.10.x
Other Linux
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Panel Maintainers
Panel Maintainers
: 171753 172864 300212 300778 300823 300979 301031 301083 301136 301246 301531 301556 301751 302129 302642 302665 302690 302738 302867 303104 303207 303336 303608 304140 304241 304462 304722 305471 305694 305947 305952 306035 306291 306562 306591 306613 306677 306768 306856 306869 307078 307097 307226 307364 307669 307845 308747 308883 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-03-17 11:59 UTC by Sebastien Bacher
Modified: 2005-06-24 15:00 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Sebastien Bacher 2005-03-17 11:59:10 UTC
This bug has been opened here: https://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/7319

"I was minding my own business, not interacting with the panel at all, and it
crashed on me.

0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 2 (Thread -1224381520 (LWP 17158))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 poll
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #2 g_main_context_poll
    at gmain.c line 2880
  • #3 g_main_context_iterate
    at gmain.c line 2573
  • #4 IA__g_main_loop_run
    at gmain.c line 2782
  • #5 link_thread_io_context
    from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
  • #6 __JCR_LIST__
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 ??
  • #8 g_thread_create_proxy
    at gthread.c line 561
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 ??
  • #2 ??
  • #3 ??
  • #4 ??
  • #5 ??
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
  • #9 ??
  • #10 ??
  • #11 ??
  • #12 ??
  • #13 ??
  • #14 ??
  • #15 ??
  • #16 ??
  • #17 ??
  • #18 ??
  • #19 ??
  • #20 ??
  • #21 ??
  • #22 ??
  • #23 ??
  • #24 ??
  • #25 ??
  • #26 ??
  • #27 ??
  • #28 ??
  • #29 ??
  • #30 ??
  • #31 ??
  • #32 ??
  • #33 ??
  • #34 ??
  • #35 ??
  • #36 ??
  • #37 ??
  • #38 ??
  • #39 ??
  • #40 ??
  • #41 ??
  • #42 ??
  • #43 ??
  • #44 ??
  • #45 ??
  • #46 ??
  • #47 ??
  • #48 ??
  • #49 ??
  • #50 ??
  • #51 ??
  • #52 ??
  • #53 ??
  • #54 ??
  • #55 ??
  • #56 ??
  • #57 ??
  • #58 ??
  • #59 ??
  • #60 ??
  • #61 ??
  • #62 ??
  • #63 ??
  • #64 <signal handler called>
  • #65 egg_recent_model_changed
    at egg-recent-model.c line 1679
  • #66 egg_recent_model_monitor_cb
    at egg-recent-model.c line 662
  • #67 ??
  • #68 ??
  • #69 ??
  • #70 ??
  • #71 ??
  • #72 ??
  • #73 ??
  • #74 ??
  • #75 ??
  • #76 ??
  • #77 ??
  • #78 ??
  • #79 ??
  • #80 ??
  • #81 egg_recent_model_monitor_cb
    at egg-recent-model.c line 661

Comment 1 Vincent Untz 2005-03-23 20:27:39 UTC
Stack trace that may be related:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-panel'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
`system-supplied DSO at 0xffffe000' has disappeared; keeping its symbols.
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1221844256 (LWP 8127)]
[New Thread -1224770640 (LWP 8131)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 2 (Thread -1224770640 (LWP 8131))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 poll
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #2 g_main_context_poll
    at gmain.c line 2880
  • #3 g_main_context_iterate
    at gmain.c line 2573
  • #4 IA__g_main_loop_run
    at gmain.c line 2782
  • #5 link_thread_io_context
    from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
  • #6 __JCR_LIST__
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 ??
  • #8 g_thread_create_proxy
    at gthread.c line 561
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 2 Vincent Untz 2005-03-28 12:10:12 UTC
Patch in bug #168578 might help here.
Comment 3 Sebastien Bacher 2005-04-04 07:41:48 UTC
the submitter doesn't get the issue again (without patching), should we close
the bug ?
Comment 4 Vincent Untz 2005-04-04 07:52:54 UTC
Other Ubuntu users are getting similar crashes too.
See bug #171753 and bug #171556.
Comment 5 Vincent Untz 2005-04-07 06:27:17 UTC
*** Bug 172864 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Vincent Untz 2005-04-10 12:27:28 UTC
*** Bug 171753 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Elijah Newren 2005-04-11 19:54:46 UTC
*** Bug 300212 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Elijah Newren 2005-04-16 00:51:35 UTC
*** Bug 300778 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Vincent Untz 2005-04-16 07:09:48 UTC
*** Bug 300823 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Kjartan Maraas 2005-04-17 19:45:12 UTC
*** Bug 300979 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Kjartan Maraas 2005-04-18 12:03:29 UTC
*** Bug 301031 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Kjartan Maraas 2005-04-18 12:20:12 UTC
*** Bug 301050 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Kjartan Maraas 2005-04-19 12:19:50 UTC
*** Bug 301083 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14 Kjartan Maraas 2005-04-19 13:33:01 UTC
*** Bug 301136 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Elijah Newren 2005-04-20 05:44:08 UTC
*** Bug 301246 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16 Kjartan Maraas 2005-04-22 13:29:28 UTC
*** Bug 301531 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17 Kjartan Maraas 2005-04-22 13:29:49 UTC
*** Bug 301556 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18 Olav Vitters 2005-04-23 23:33:50 UTC
*** Bug 301751 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 19 Elijah Newren 2005-04-28 02:18:33 UTC
*** Bug 302129 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 20 Elijah Newren 2005-05-02 01:44:29 UTC
*** Bug 302665 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 21 Elijah Newren 2005-05-02 01:44:35 UTC
*** Bug 302642 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 22 Kjartan Maraas 2005-05-02 10:27:07 UTC
*** Bug 302690 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 23 Mark McLoughlin 2005-05-03 06:52:42 UTC
Seeing this in Fedora too:

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156633
Comment 24 Vincent Untz 2005-05-03 20:09:12 UTC
Mark: it'd be great if you could find time to make a RPM with the patch in bug
168578 for the fedora bug reporter.
Comment 25 Elijah Newren 2005-05-04 01:45:09 UTC
*** Bug 302867 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 26 Kjartan Maraas 2005-05-04 14:55:17 UTC
*** Bug 302738 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 27 Mark McLoughlin 2005-05-04 14:56:29 UTC
I could reproduce here with a pathological case and I seemed to have fixed with:

2005-05-04  Mark McLoughlin  <mark@skynet.ie>

        Fix crasher with recent items menu - bug #170660

        * egg-recent-model.c:
        (egg_recent_model_changed_timeout): set timeout id
        to zero.
        (egg_recent_model_finalize): remove the timeout if
        it is still around.


Fix is in:

  - libegg HEAD
  - gnome-panel HEAD (will be 2.11.1)
  - gnome-panel gnome-2-10 branch (will be 2.10.2)
  - gnome-panel-2.10.1-9 in Fedora rawhide
Comment 28 Olav Vitters 2005-05-05 20:22:29 UTC
*** Bug 303104 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 29 Olav Vitters 2005-05-06 10:49:53 UTC
*** Bug 303207 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 30 Christian Kirbach 2005-05-09 22:12:51 UTC
*** Bug 303608 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 31 Christian Kirbach 2005-05-14 13:06:18 UTC
*** Bug 304140 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 32 Christian Kirbach 2005-05-15 21:50:37 UTC
*** Bug 304241 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 33 gianluca 2005-05-16 10:47:48 UTC
I'm a newbie... I had this problem with Gnome Panel. Is there someone who could
explain me how to resolve it?
Thank you much!
Now the only solution I found is to digit in shell the following line: rm
/.recently-used

But after a lot of time, the problem appears again!
Comment 34 Elijah Newren 2005-05-18 02:11:38 UTC
*** Bug 304462 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 35 Elijah Newren 2005-05-20 01:25:19 UTC
*** Bug 304722 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 36 Vincent Untz 2005-05-31 11:47:38 UTC
*** Bug 303336 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 37 Vincent Untz 2005-05-31 11:47:46 UTC
*** Bug 305471 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 38 Vincent Untz 2005-05-31 11:47:54 UTC
*** Bug 305694 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 39 Vincent Untz 2005-05-31 11:48:03 UTC
*** Bug 305947 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 40 Vincent Untz 2005-05-31 11:48:11 UTC
*** Bug 305952 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 41 Sebastien Bacher 2005-06-05 18:22:34 UTC
*** Bug 306562 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 42 Sebastien Bacher 2005-06-05 18:22:50 UTC
*** Bug 306291 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 43 Sebastien Bacher 2005-06-05 19:49:36 UTC
*** Bug 306035 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 44 Vincent Untz 2005-06-06 07:28:21 UTC
*** Bug 306613 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 45 Vincent Untz 2005-06-06 07:28:40 UTC
*** Bug 306591 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 46 Vincent Untz 2005-06-06 19:27:17 UTC
*** Bug 306677 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 47 Christian Kirbach 2005-06-07 14:48:43 UTC
*** Bug 306768 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 48 Christian Kirbach 2005-06-08 14:30:24 UTC
*** Bug 306856 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 49 Vincent Untz 2005-06-08 17:04:52 UTC
*** Bug 306869 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 50 Vincent Untz 2005-06-10 06:48:18 UTC
*** Bug 307097 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 51 Vincent Untz 2005-06-10 06:48:26 UTC
*** Bug 307078 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 52 Vincent Untz 2005-06-11 05:59:30 UTC
*** Bug 307226 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 53 Christian Kirbach 2005-06-12 20:03:25 UTC
*** Bug 307364 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 54 Vincent Noel 2005-06-15 14:58:29 UTC
*** Bug 307669 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 55 Vincent Noel 2005-06-16 16:25:56 UTC
*** Bug 307845 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 56 Sebastien Bacher 2005-06-24 14:59:23 UTC
*** Bug 308747 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 57 Sebastien Bacher 2005-06-24 15:00:36 UTC
*** Bug 308883 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***