After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 170635 - When browsing to a specific folder, nautilus crashes
When browsing to a specific folder, nautilus crashes
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 141916
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.10.x
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-03-17 06:14 UTC by touko.apajalahti
Modified: 2005-03-17 16:49 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10



Description touko.apajalahti 2005-03-17 06:14:14 UTC
Distribution: Debian 3.1
Package: nautilus
Severity: normal
Version: GNOME2.10.0 2.10.0
Gnome-Distributor: Ubuntu
Synopsis: When browsing to a specific folder, nautilus crashes
Bugzilla-Product: nautilus
Bugzilla-Component: general
Bugzilla-Version: 2.10.0
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.10.0)
Description:
Description of the crash:

When browsing to a specific folder by nautilus, nautilus alternatively
crashes or freezes. The folder is on a fat32 drive, and its name
contains characters ä and ö. The folder was originally created from
nautilus.

Steps to reproduce the crash:
1. Start from ~ folder and by double clicking, advance to the directory
2. 
3. 

Expected Results:
Program crash or freeze

How often does this happen?
Always

Additional Information:



Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
`system-supplied DSO at 0xffffe000' has disappeared; keeping its
symbols.
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1224685760 (LWP 10158)]
[New Thread -1239045200 (LWP 10164)]
[New Thread -1237787728 (LWP 10161)]
[New Thread -1227379792 (LWP 10160)]
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 4 (Thread -1227379792 (LWP 10160))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 poll
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #2 g_main_loop_get_context
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #5 link_thread_io_context
    from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
  • #6 ??
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 ??
  • #8 g_static_private_free
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2005-03-17 01:14 -------


Unknown version 2.10.0 in product nautilus.  Setting version to "2.10.x".
Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other".
Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "nautilus".
   Setting to default milestone for this product, '---'
The original reporter of this bug does not have
   an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved
   it here, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
   Previous reporter was touko.apajalahti@tut.fi.
Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED".
Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.

Comment 1 Elijah Newren 2005-03-17 16:49:48 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into
our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

Matches the stack trace in bug 167018 (and in bug 166309), the former of which
has been marked as a duplicate of 141916.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 141916 ***