After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 148719 - Crash inside _gnome_vfs_drive_from_corba
Crash inside _gnome_vfs_drive_from_corba
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 148847
Product: gnome-vfs
Classification: Deprecated
Component: Other
2.7.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gnome-vfs maintainers
gnome-vfs maintainers
: 150103 151353 152873 152886 154682 155279 158773 159094 160613 160818 160971 165127 167716 170763 171849 308410 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-07-28 20:11 UTC by Crispin Flowerday (not receiving bugmail)
Modified: 2005-09-18 15:06 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10


Description Crispin Flowerday (not receiving bugmail) 2004-07-28 20:11:57 UTC 
Distribution: Debian 3.1
Package: control-center
Severity: normal
Version: GNOME2.7.4 2.7.0
Gnome-Distributor: GNOME.Org
Synopsis: Crash inside _gnome_vfs_drive_from_corba
Bugzilla-Product: control-center
Bugzilla-Component: background
Bugzilla-Version: 2.7.0
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.7.2)
Description:
Whenever I start the gnome-background-properties (or nautilus), using a
fresh jhbuild gnome 2.7 build from today, it looks like gnome-vfs is
crashing for me. There is no output on the console.

FWIW, I have hal and dbus running, using the latest packages from
debian/unstable (0.2.95-2 and 0.21-7) respectively.


Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from
'/opt/gnome2/bin/gnome-background-properties'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1087644032 (LWP 14598)]
[New Thread 1099000752 (LWP 14601)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1087644032 (LWP 14598)]
[New Thread 1099000752 (LWP 14601)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1087644032 (LWP 14598)]
[New Thread 1099000752 (LWP 14601)]
0x409c7431 in __waitpid_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0

+ Trace 48916

Thread 1 (Thread 1087644032 (LWP 14598))

  • #0 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 libgnomeui_segv_handle
    at gnome-ui-init.c line 741
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 _gnome_vfs_drive_from_corba
    at gnome-vfs-drive.c line 430
  • #4 read_drives_from_daemon
    at gnome-vfs-volume-monitor-client.c line 128
  • #5 gnome_vfs_volume_monitor_client_init
    at gnome-vfs-volume-monitor-client.c line 181
  • #6 g_type_create_instance
    at gtype.c line 1595
  • #7 g_object_constructor
    at gobject.c line 1044
  • #8 g_object_newv
    at gobject.c line 941
  • #9 g_object_new_valist
    at gobject.c line 984
  • #10 g_object_new
    at gobject.c line 822
  • #11 _gnome_vfs_get_volume_monitor_internal
    at gnome-vfs-volume-monitor.c line 223
  • #12 gnome_vfs_get_volume_monitor
    at gnome-vfs-volume-monitor.c line 237
  • #13 gtk_file_system_gnome_vfs_init
    at gtkfilesystemgnomevfs.c line 383
  • #14 g_type_create_instance
    at gtype.c line 1595
  • #15 g_object_constructor
    at gobject.c line 1044
  • #16 g_object_newv
    at gobject.c line 941
  • #17 g_object_new_valist
    at gobject.c line 984
  • #18 g_object_new
    at gobject.c line 822
  • #19 gtk_file_system_gnome_vfs_new
    at gtkfilesystemgnomevfs.c line 303
  • #20 fs_module_create
    at gtkfilesystemgnomevfs.c line 2419
  • #21 _gtk_file_system_module_create
    at gtkfilesystem.c line 1101
  • #22 _gtk_file_system_create
    at gtkfilesystem.c line 1140
  • #23 set_file_system_backend
    at gtkfilechooserdefault.c line 3280
  • #24 g_object_constructor
    at gobject.c line 724
  • #25 gtk_file_chooser_default_constructor
    at gtkfilechooserdefault.c line 3139
  • #26 g_object_newv
    at gobject.c line 941
  • #27 g_object_new_valist
    at gobject.c line 1025
  • #28 g_object_new
    at gobject.c line 822
  • #29 _gtk_file_chooser_default_new
    at gtkfilechooserdefault.c line 5228
  • #30 gtk_file_chooser_widget_constructor
    at gtkfilechooserwidget.c line 155
  • #31 g_object_newv
    at gobject.c line 941
  • #32 g_object_new_valist
    at gobject.c line 984
  • #33 g_object_new
    at gobject.c line 822
  • #34 gtk_file_chooser_dialog_constructor
    at gtkfilechooserdialog.c line 385
  • #35 g_object_newv
    at gobject.c line 941
  • #36 g_object_new_valist
    at gobject.c line 1025
  • #37 g_object_new
    at gobject.c line 822
  • #38 gtk_file_chooser_dialog_new_valist
    at gtkfilechooserdialog.c line 544
  • #39 gtk_file_chooser_dialog_new
    at gtkfilechooserdialog.c line 589
  • #40 wallpaper_properties_init
    at gnome-wp-capplet.c line 1231
  • #41 main
    at gnome-wp-capplet.c line 1256
  • #0 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2004-07-28 16:11 -------


Unknown version 2.7.0 in product control-center. Setting version to "1.4.0".
Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other".
Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "control-center".
   Setting to default milestone for this product, '---'
Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED".
Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.
Comment 1 Crispin Flowerday (not receiving bugmail) 2004-07-28 20:25:51 UTC 
This appears to have been caused by running some old component out of my gnome
2.6 installation, possibly the gnome-vfs-daemon, but a few null checks should
possibly be put in there :-)

Hmm, and bug-buddy put this in control-center, I'm moving it to gnome-vfs, where
the crash really occurs
Comment 2 Ricardo Fernández Pascual 2004-08-09 13:06:57 UTC 
Me too:  http://skywalker.dif.um.es/~rfernandez/crash-download
Comment 3 Christophe Fergeau 2004-08-09 13:12:00 UTC 
Crispin, is hal support enabled in gnome-vfs?
Ricardo, do you have hal installed, if yes, same question as for Crispin ;)
Comment 4 Crispin Flowerday (not receiving bugmail) 2004-08-09 13:19:40 UTC 
It doesn't look to be linked against hal to me.
Comment 5 Christophe Fergeau 2004-08-14 08:48:09 UTC 
*** Bug 150103 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Allison Karlitskaya (desrt) 2004-08-16 20:24:25 UTC 
Someone on #nautilus had this problem yesterday.

I'm fairly sure it's caused entirely by having a gnome-vfs-daemon that's out of
sync with libgnomevfs (in his case, he had an /opt/gnome2/ that
bonobo-activation-server was starting gnome-vfs-daemon out of.)

Does anyone have a counterexample?
Comment 7 Christophe Fergeau 2004-08-29 17:25:59 UTC 
Lowering priority since the only known example of that happening is when someone
is running the 2.6 gnome-vfs-daemon with an app linked against gnome-vfs 2.7.
Comment 8 Christophe Fergeau 2004-08-29 17:26:20 UTC 
*** Bug 151353 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Crispin Flowerday (not receiving bugmail) 2004-10-13 11:22:45 UTC 
*** Bug 155279 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Crispin Flowerday (not receiving bugmail) 2004-10-29 20:07:10 UTC 
*** Bug 154682 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Crispin Flowerday (not receiving bugmail) 2004-10-29 20:07:14 UTC 
*** Bug 152886 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Crispin Flowerday (not receiving bugmail) 2004-10-29 20:07:19 UTC 
*** Bug 152873 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Elijah Newren 2004-11-20 02:33:18 UTC 
*** Bug 158773 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14 Elijah Newren 2004-11-22 18:30:43 UTC 
*** Bug 159094 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Crispin Flowerday (not receiving bugmail) 2004-12-06 20:42:08 UTC 
*** Bug 160613 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16 Elijah Newren 2004-12-10 18:26:12 UTC 
*** Bug 160971 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17 Elijah Newren 2004-12-22 17:04:09 UTC 
*** Bug 160818 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18 Kjartan Maraas 2005-01-04 00:50:18 UTC 
Reported with 2.9.x too.
Comment 19 Elijah Newren 2005-01-24 21:46:18 UTC 
*** Bug 165127 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 20 Crispin Flowerday (not receiving bugmail) 2005-02-05 22:10:55 UTC 
This is also reported as bug 148847, which has more discussion, and more dups

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 148847 ***
Comment 21 Elijah Newren 2005-02-17 17:12:38 UTC 
*** Bug 167716 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 22 Elijah Newren 2005-03-18 15:39:28 UTC 
*** Bug 170763 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 23 Elijah Newren 2005-03-28 05:44:28 UTC 
*** Bug 171849 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 24 Nickolay V. Shmyrev 2005-06-22 20:40:32 UTC 
*** Bug 308410 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 25 Christophe Fergeau 2005-09-18 15:06:48 UTC 
*** Bug 316140 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***