GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 128424
Crash in glib: g_type_check_instance_is_a() after closing last window (nautilus-2.5.2, glib-2.3.0)
Last modified: 2004-12-22 21:47:04 UTC
Description of Problem: Nautilus crashes after closing the last opened window. That is, open lots of windows, close them, and after closing the last one, nautilus crashes. (not necessarily nautilus fault, glib? see stack-trace) Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. Open home folder 2. close it 3. crash How often does this happen? Every time. Additional Information: (Listing (hopefully) related version-numbers Compiled from garnome 2.28.2 nautilus 2.5.2 glib-2.3.0 Running on fedora core 1 Stack:
+ Trace 42270
$6 = {parent_instance = {g_type_instance = {g_class = 0x80e1f60}, ref_count = 1, qdata = 0x82b8660}, queued_events = 0x83762dc, queued_tail = 0x83762dc, button_click_time = {86291312, 86291112}, button_window = {0x83e8108, 0x83e8108}, button_number = {1, 1}, double_click_time = 400, core_pointer = 0x80e6878, pointer_hooks = 0x4f1db170, closed = 0} (gdb) Please query me if additional info is needed.
I think I'm seeing the same or at least a similar bug that I reported in bug #128645. I will attach a stack trace here that seems to be very similar to above.
Created attachment 22146 [details] stack trace
*** Bug 128645 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Is it still happening with newest GTK+ ? (either CVS HEAD, or 2.3.1 which will be released next week hopefully)
I updated to CVS versions of both GTK+ and Nautilus and still get this crash (actually, I get stack traces like those in bug #128424, which I'm not sure are identical, although they may be -- I added a comment to that bug about that).
Doing some basic fixes: GNOMEVER2.0 should be GNOMEVER2.5, this should be priority->high & severity->critical (it's a crasher), I'm adding the STACKTRACE keyword and the bugsquad keyword as well. Finally, I'm setting the version appropriately.
This bug is a duplicate of 116719. Expect lots of duplicates as people start testing nautilus with gtk+ HEAD. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 116719 ***
Reopening to duplicate against right bug
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 117579 ***