GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 112805
Crash when browsing the samba network using nautilus
Last modified: 2004-12-22 21:47:04 UTC
Package: nautilus Severity: normal Version: 2.2.2 Synopsis: Crash when browsing the samba network using nautilus Bugzilla-Product: nautilus Bugzilla-Component: File and Folder Operations BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.2.0.1) Description: Description of Problem: Crash occured when browsing the samba network using nautilus Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. 2. 3. Actual Results: Expected Results: How often does this happen? Additional Information: Debugging Information: Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus' (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 16384 (LWP 630)] [New Thread 32769 (LWP 631)] [New Thread 16386 (LWP 632)] [New Thread 32771 (LWP 633)] [New Thread 49156 (LWP 634)] (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...0x40b4fb89 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6
+ Trace 36790
Thread 5 (Thread 49156 (LWP 634))
Thread 4 (Thread 32771 (LWP 633))
Thread 3 (Thread 16386 (LWP 632))
Thread 1 (Thread 16384 (LWP 630))
------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2003-05-11 23:07 ------- The original reporter (mowens@cablespeed.com) of this bug does not have an account here. Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org. Reassigning to the default owner of the component, nautilus-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.
I believe that, like 110942, this is actually the same bug as 107741. However, since I'm not perfect at matching stack traces, I'm just going to mark this as a duplicate of 110942. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 110942 ***