GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 102874
crash when making large title
Last modified: 2004-12-22 21:47:04 UTC
Package: gnome-terminal Severity: normal Version: GNOME2.1.5 2.1.3 Synopsis: crash when making large title Bugzilla-Product: gnome-terminal Bugzilla-Component: general BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.1.5) Description: Description of Problem: my shell undiscrimatly pastes my command line to the title. This time it crashed gnome-terminal. It looks like a problem in pango, move to gtk+? Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. set your shell to write command line in title 2. do something like this: $ echo <<EOL | patch -p0 --- csharp-mode.el.orig 2003-01-07 13:09:50.000000000 -0800 +++ csharp-mode.el 2003-01-07 13:27:48.000000000 -0800 @@ -120,8 +120,10 @@ ) ;;xemacs fix -(if (not (facep font-lock-constant-face)) - (copy-face font-lock-reference-face font-lock-constant-face)) +(if (not (facep 'font-lock-constant-face)) + (copy-face 'font-lock-reference-face 'font-lock-constant-face)) +(if (not (facep 'font-lock-builtin-face)) + (copy-face 'font-lock-keyword-face 'font-lock-builtin-face)) (defconst c-Csharp-extra-toplevel-key "\\(namespace\\)") @@ -296,8 +298,8 @@ (list ;; ;; Fontify symbol names in #elif or #if ... defined preprocessor directives. - '("^#[ \t]*\\(elif\\|if\\|endif\\)\\(\\sw+\\)?" - (1 font-lock-builtin-face) (3 font-lock-variable-name-face nil t)) + '("^\\(#[ \t]*\\(elif\\|if\\|endif\\|define\\)\\)[ \t]*\\(\\sw+\\)?" + (1 font-lock-preprocessor-face) (3 font-lock-variable-name-face nil t)) ;; Fontify class names. '("\\<\\(class\\|struct\\|enum\\|interface\\)\\>[ \t]*\\(\\sw+\\)?" EOL 3. Actual Results: crash Expected Results: no crash How often does this happen? Additional Information: Debugging Information: Backtrace was generated from '/home/davh/garnome/bin/gnome-terminal' [New Thread 16384 (LWP 2400)] 0x40bb42e9 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6
+ Trace 32456
Thread 1 (Thread 16384 (LWP 2400))
------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2003-01-08 16:02 ------- Reassigning to the default owner of the component, hp@redhat.com.
Is this a newer version than the supposid fix in bug 95786. I'm guessing it is not. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 95786 ***