After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 96816 - Improved use of the statusbar
Improved use of the statusbar
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: File and Folder Operations
2.11.x
Other All
: High enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
: 42935 95980 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-10-25 17:31 UTC by Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail]
Modified: 2012-08-31 15:26 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.11/2.12


Attachments
Proposed patch (against HEAD). (4.42 KB, patch)
2005-07-10 17:01 UTC, Christian Neumair
none Details | Review
Proposed patch #2 against HEAD (9.68 KB, patch)
2005-07-14 11:14 UTC, Christian Neumair
reviewed Details | Review

Description Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-10-25 17:31:49 UTC
This might be somewhat a duplicate of other bugs, but i'm not quite sure
but i'll hunt around the database later to check.

Anyway I was playing around with konqueror and notice some niceties about
it's statusbar behavior.

1. when you mouse over empty space in a folder (or do not mouse over at
all), konq displays how many items are in the folder, and also displays how
many folder and files there are using the following format.

19 items - 14 files (the total size of the files) - 5 folders

2. When you mouse over but do not select an icon it displays the icons
name, size and type in the statusbar

test.case~ (36B) Backup File

3. when you select multiple items it continues to display the information
on these items until they are unselected, nautilus stops displaying
information after a short period of time.

I think it would be nice to add these features to nautilus.
Comment 1 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2002-11-03 20:10:41 UTC
*** Bug 95980 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Calum Benson 2002-11-20 18:55:58 UTC
Certainly any feature that depends on a timeout ("nautilus stops
displaying information after a short period of time") has
accessibility consequences, and should probably be fixed so that the
information only disappears in response to user action.
Comment 3 David Kennedy 2002-11-23 22:47:30 UTC
Past 2.2 feature freeze, changing to gnomever2.3, adding bugsquad.
Comment 4 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2003-01-04 08:52:16 UTC
*** Bug 42935 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Dave Bordoley [Not Reading Bug Mail] 2003-01-22 03:30:02 UTC
just wanted to note that the time delay removal of info from the
statusbar has been removed.
Comment 6 Calum Benson 2003-06-25 23:07:22 UTC
Removing accessibility keyword since the a11y aspects seem to have
been dealt with.
Comment 7 Christian Neumair 2005-07-10 17:01:12 UTC
Created attachment 48914 [details] [review]
Proposed patch (against HEAD).

The attached patch at least tries to fix issue 2. It is just a first shot, we
should really investigate whether the terminology is appropriate.
Since English is not my mother tongue, I count on you usability crew :).
I've not yet included the list view part because it would probably break
another bigger patch I've written some months ago which also modifies hovering
behavior.
Comment 8 Christian Neumair 2005-07-14 11:14:17 UTC
Created attachment 49159 [details] [review]
Proposed patch #2 against HEAD

OK, the attached patch now works for the list view as well. Usability crew,
what do you think about the proposed labels?
Comment 9 Christian Neumair 2005-07-24 01:09:57 UTC
Usability team?

For folders, I used:
  "\"%s\" under pointer (%u item)"
  ""\"%s\" under pointer (%u item)"

and for files:
  ""\"%s\" under pointer"

where %s is filled with the item name and %u with the folder item count. Do you
like the "under pointer" terminology?
Comment 10 Christian Neumair 2005-10-14 11:48:39 UTC
Usability team?
Comment 11 Vidar Braut Haarr 2005-10-14 12:48:14 UTC
I personally think this sort of behavior should only be in effect if
single-click launching (or whatever it's called) is on.

The statusbar is there to show the status of the current object, which is the
folder you're in, not the whatever your mouse happens to be passing over.

If people want to see this information, I believe it is accessible as 2nd or 3rd
labels on the file/folder objects if you change the zoom level?
Comment 12 Calum Benson 2005-11-11 18:43:10 UTC
I mostly agree with Vidar. I think the current use of the status bar for the
default double-click mode is already clear and straightforward, but that the
suggestion *might* be worth trying out in single-click mode.  (I don't
particularly like the 'under pointer' terminology, or the use of parentheses,
though... a comma is probably sufficient to separate the two bits of information.)

FWIW, I would also suggest that in both modes, the information for any
focused-but-not-selected file (i.e. using Ctrl-arrows) should be shown in the
status bar for as long as Ctrl is held down after the item is focused.  When
Ctrl is released, the information should revert to that for the current
selection, or the current folder if there is no selection.  This could help
keyboard users decide whether they want to add a particular file to the
selection (with Ctrl-Space).
Comment 13 William Jon McCann 2012-08-31 15:26:11 UTC
The status bar design has changed considerably since this was filed. The changes after a certain time part has been fixed and I don't think we want to flash the status bar as you move the mouse around the screen.